Extended p-median problems for balancing service efficiency and equality
0
🔄
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the trade-off between service efficiency and equality in public service systems
- Proposes four extended p-median problems to balance travel cost and spatial envy
- Mathematically proves five analytical properties of the new problems
- Tests the new problems on well-designed instances and finds they can substantially improve equality measures
Plain English Explanation
This research paper looks at the challenge of locating public service facilities in a way that balances efficiency and fairness. In public service systems, some people may feel envious if they have to travel farther to access services than others. The strength of this "envy" can be measured by comparing a person's travel distance to a service facility with a threshold distance.
The researchers use this idea of "travel envy" to propose four new optimization problems that aim to minimize both travel cost and inequality in access to services. They mathematically prove several important properties of these new problems.
The researchers then test the new problems on some carefully designed test cases. The results show that by considering both travel cost and spatial envy, the new problems can substantially improve measures of equality, such as standard deviation, mean absolute deviation, and the Gini coefficient of travel distances.
The experiments also reveal some interesting insights. For example, if the number of service facilities is fixed, the equality of access can be improved by slightly increasing the average travel distance. And when the number of facilities is increased, both efficiency and equality can be significantly improved.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes four new "extended p-median" optimization problems that aim to balance service efficiency and equality. The p-median problem is a classic facility location problem that seeks to minimize the total travel cost to service facilities.
The new problems extend the p-median by incorporating a "total envy function" that measures the degree of spatial envy experienced by users. This envy is quantified by comparing each user's travel distance to a threshold distance. The four new problems then seek to minimize both the total travel cost and this total envy function.
The paper mathematically proves five key analytical properties of these new problems, including their NP-hardness and the existence of optimal solutions.
The researchers then evaluate the new problems on three sets of well-designed test instances. The results show that by optimizing for both travel cost and envy, the new problems can substantially improve standard measures of equality, such as standard deviation, mean absolute deviation, and the Gini coefficient of travel distances.
The experiments also provide insights on the trade-offs between efficiency and equality. For example, when the number of facilities is fixed, improving equality may require slightly increasing the average travel distance. And when the number of facilities is increased, both efficiency and equality can be significantly improved.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous mathematical framework for balancing efficiency and fairness in public service location. The new optimization problems and their analytical properties are well-developed and the experimental results are compelling.
However, the paper does not extensively discuss some potential limitations or real-world considerations. For example, it does not address how the threshold distance used to measure envy should be determined in practice. It also does not consider other factors that may influence service accessibility, such as transportation mode, individual mobility constraints, or the distribution of demand.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the ability to improve aggregate measures of equality, it does not explore the distribution of outcomes or whether the solutions ensure a minimum level of accessibility for all users. Further research may be needed to ensure the new models truly deliver equitable access to public services.
Overall, this work represents an important step in rethinking facility location problems to prioritize both efficiency and fairness. The proposed approach and insights provide a valuable foundation for future research on [optimizing the accessibility and equity of public service systems.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a novel approach to the facility location problem that aims to balance service efficiency and spatial equality. By incorporating a measure of travel envy into the optimization, the proposed extended p-median problems can substantially improve various indicators of access equality while still reducing overall travel costs.
The key insights from this work include the ability to improve equality by slightly increasing average travel distances when the number of facilities is fixed, and the potential to achieve significant improvements in both efficiency and equality when the number of facilities is increased. These findings offer valuable guidance for policymakers and planners seeking to design more equitable public service systems.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards rethinking facility location problems to prioritize fairness alongside efficiency. The mathematical rigor and experimental validation provide a strong foundation for future work in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔄
0
Extended p-median problems for balancing service efficiency and equality
Yunfeng Kong, Chenchen Lian, Guangli Zhang, Shiyan Zhai
This article deals with the location problem for balancing the service efficiency and equality. In public service systems, some individuals may experience envy if they have to travel longer distances to access services compared to others. This envy can be simplified by comparing an individual's travel distance to a service facility against a threshold distance. Four extended p-median problems are proposed, utilizing the total travel distance and total envy to balance service efficiency and spatial equality. The new objective function is designed to be inequity-averse and exhibits several analytical properties that pertain to both service efficiency and equality. The extended problems were extensively tested on two sets of benchmark instances and one set of geographical instances. The experimentation shows that the equality measures, such as the standard deviation, mean absolute deviation, and Gini coefficient between travel distances, can be substantially improved by slightly increasing the travel distance. Additionally, the advantages of the proposed problems were validated through Pareto optimality analysis and comparisons with other location problems.
Read more9/14/2024
🤔
0
Private Geometric Median
Mahdi Haghifam, Thomas Steinke, Jonathan Ullman
In this paper, we study differentially private (DP) algorithms for computing the geometric median (GM) of a dataset: Given $n$ points, $x_1,dots,x_n$ in $mathbb{R}^d$, the goal is to find a point $theta$ that minimizes the sum of the Euclidean distances to these points, i.e., $sum_{i=1}^{n} |theta - x_i|_2$. Off-the-shelf methods, such as DP-GD, require strong a priori knowledge locating the data within a ball of radius $R$, and the excess risk of the algorithm depends linearly on $R$. In this paper, we ask: can we design an efficient and private algorithm with an excess error guarantee that scales with the (unknown) radius containing the majority of the datapoints? Our main contribution is a pair of polynomial-time DP algorithms for the task of private GM with an excess error guarantee that scales with the effective diameter of the datapoints. Additionally, we propose an inefficient algorithm based on the inverse smooth sensitivity mechanism, which satisfies the more restrictive notion of pure DP. We complement our results with a lower bound and demonstrate the optimality of our polynomial-time algorithms in terms of sample complexity.
Read more6/12/2024
📈
0
Logistics Hub Location Optimization: A K-Means and P-Median Model Hybrid Approach Using Road Network Distances
Muhammad Abdul Rahman, Muhammad Aamir Basheer, Zubair Khalid, Muhammad Tahir, Momin Uppal
Logistic hubs play a pivotal role in the last-mile delivery distance; even a slight increment in distance negatively impacts the business of the e-commerce industry while also increasing its carbon footprint. The growth of this industry, particularly after Covid-19, has further intensified the need for optimized allocation of resources in an urban environment. In this study, we use a hybrid approach to optimize the placement of logistic hubs. The approach sequentially employs different techniques. Initially, delivery points are clustered using K-Means in relation to their spatial locations. The clustering method utilizes road network distances as opposed to Euclidean distances. Non-road network-based approaches have been avoided since they lead to erroneous and misleading results. Finally, hubs are located using the P-Median method. The P-Median method also incorporates the number of deliveries and population as weights. Real-world delivery data from Muller and Phipps (M&P) is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach. Serving deliveries from the optimal hub locations results in the saving of 815 (10%) meters per delivery.
Read more7/8/2024
0
The Fairness-Quality Trade-off in Clustering
Rashida Hakim, Ana-Andreea Stoica, Christos H. Papadimitriou, Mihalis Yannakakis
Fairness in clustering has been considered extensively in the past; however, the trade-off between the two objectives -- e.g., can we sacrifice just a little in the quality of the clustering to significantly increase fairness, or vice-versa? -- has rarely been addressed. We introduce novel algorithms for tracing the complete trade-off curve, or Pareto front, between quality and fairness in clustering problems; that is, computing all clusterings that are not dominated in both objectives by other clusterings. Unlike previous work that deals with specific objectives for quality and fairness, we deal with all objectives for fairness and quality in two general classes encompassing most of the special cases addressed in previous work. Our algorithm must take exponential time in the worst case as the Pareto front itself can be exponential. Even when the Pareto front is polynomial, our algorithm may take exponential time, and we prove that this is inevitable unless P = NP. However, we also present a new polynomial-time algorithm for computing the entire Pareto front when the cluster centers are fixed, and for perhaps the most natural fairness objective: minimizing the sum, over all clusters, of the imbalance between the two groups in each cluster.
Read more8/20/2024