Faithful and Robust Local Interpretability for Textual Predictions

Read original: arXiv:2311.01605 - Published 4/10/2024 by Gianluigi Lopardo, Frederic Precioso, Damien Garreau
Total Score

0

🌿

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a new method called FRED (Faithful and Robust Explainer for textual Documents) for interpreting text-based machine learning models.
  • FRED aims to provide three key insights to explain a model's prediction: (1) the minimal set of words that have the strongest influence on the prediction, (2) an importance score for each token reflecting its influence on the output, and (3) counterfactual explanations by generating similar documents leading to different predictions.
  • The authors establish the reliability of FRED through formal definitions and theoretical analyses, and demonstrate its effectiveness through empirical evaluation against state-of-the-art methods.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models are increasingly being used to make important decisions, such as in healthcare or finance. However, for these models to be trusted and widely adopted, it's essential that we can understand how they arrive at their predictions. Probabilities Also Matter: A More Faithful Metric of Faithfulness and Combining Transformers and Natural Language Explanations have explored this challenge of interpretability in machine learning.

The paper introduces a new method called FRED that aims to make text-based machine learning models more interpretable. FRED does three main things:

  1. It identifies the smallest set of words in a document that have the biggest impact on the model's prediction. For example, if a model is predicting whether a news article is about politics or sports, FRED would point out the key words that are driving that prediction.

  2. It assigns an importance score to each word, showing how much influence that word has on the model's output. This allows you to see which parts of the input text are most crucial to the prediction.

  3. It generates similar example texts that would lead the model to make a different prediction. This helps you understand what changes to the input would alter the model's decision.

By providing these three types of insights, FRED aims to make text-based machine learning models more transparent and trustworthy, so they can be used confidently in important real-world applications. Automatic Detection of Relevant Information in Predictions and Forecasts for Financial Markets, Explainable Traffic Flow Prediction with Large Language Models, and Calibrating Confidence in Large Language Models by Eliciting have all explored the importance of interpretability for machine learning models in different domains.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel method called FRED (Faithful and Robust Explainer for textual Documents) for interpreting text-based machine learning models. FRED offers three key insights to explain a model's prediction:

  1. Identifying the Minimal Influential Set of Words: FRED determines the smallest subset of words in a document whose removal has the strongest influence on the model's prediction. This allows it to pinpoint the most important parts of the input text.

  2. Assigning Token-Level Importance Scores: FRED assigns an importance score to each token (word) in the input, reflecting its influence on the model's output. This provides a more granular understanding of which parts of the text are driving the prediction.

  3. Generating Counterfactual Explanations: FRED can generate similar documents that lead the model to make a different prediction. This helps users understand what changes to the input would alter the model's decision.

The authors establish the reliability of FRED through formal definitions and theoretical analyses. They prove that FRED's explanations are faithful to the underlying model, meaning they accurately reflect the model's decision-making process.

The paper also includes an empirical evaluation of FRED against state-of-the-art interpretation methods. The results demonstrate that FRED provides more insightful and faithful explanations for text-based machine learning models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed approach to interpreting text-based machine learning models. The authors' focus on providing faithful and robust explanations is commendable, as it helps address concerns around the trustworthiness of these models when deployed in critical domains.

One potential limitation of the FRED method is that it may not scale well to very long or complex documents, as the process of identifying the minimal influential set of words could become computationally intensive. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to optimize the method for larger inputs.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases that may be introduced in the counterfactual examples generated by FRED. While this feature is valuable for understanding the model's decision-making, it's important to ensure that the generated examples do not perpetuate or amplify existing biases in the training data or model.

Overall, the FRED method represents a significant step forward in interpretability for text-based machine learning models. The authors' thorough theoretical and empirical analysis lends credibility to their work, and the insights provided by FRED could greatly enhance the trust and adoption of these models in critical applications.

Conclusion

The paper introduces FRED, a novel method for interpreting text-based machine learning models. FRED provides three key insights to explain a model's prediction: identifying the minimal set of influential words, assigning importance scores to tokens, and generating counterfactual explanations.

The authors establish the reliability of FRED through formal definitions and theoretical analyses, and demonstrate its effectiveness through empirical evaluation. This work represents an important contribution to the field of interpretable machine learning, particularly in the context of text-based models that are increasingly being deployed in critical domains.

By enhancing the transparency and trustworthiness of these models, FRED has the potential to facilitate their wider adoption and unlock new applications that require a deep understanding of the model's decision-making process. As machine learning continues to shape important decisions, methods like FRED will be crucial for building confidence and accountability in these systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌿

Total Score

0

Faithful and Robust Local Interpretability for Textual Predictions

Gianluigi Lopardo, Frederic Precioso, Damien Garreau

Interpretability is essential for machine learning models to be trusted and deployed in critical domains. However, existing methods for interpreting text models are often complex, lack mathematical foundations, and their performance is not guaranteed. In this paper, we propose FRED (Faithful and Robust Explainer for textual Documents), a novel method for interpreting predictions over text. FRED offers three key insights to explain a model prediction: (1) it identifies the minimal set of words in a document whose removal has the strongest influence on the prediction, (2) it assigns an importance score to each token, reflecting its influence on the model's output, and (3) it provides counterfactual explanations by generating examples similar to the original document, but leading to a different prediction. We establish the reliability of FRED through formal definitions and theoretical analyses on interpretable classifiers. Additionally, our empirical evaluation against state-of-the-art methods demonstrates the effectiveness of FRED in providing insights into text models.

Read more

4/10/2024

An Evaluation of Explanation Methods for Black-Box Detectors of Machine-Generated Text
Total Score

0

An Evaluation of Explanation Methods for Black-Box Detectors of Machine-Generated Text

Loris Schoenegger, Yuxi Xia, Benjamin Roth

The increasing difficulty to distinguish language-model-generated from human-written text has led to the development of detectors of machine-generated text (MGT). However, in many contexts, a black-box prediction is not sufficient, it is equally important to know on what grounds a detector made that prediction. Explanation methods that estimate feature importance promise to provide indications of which parts of an input are used by classifiers for prediction. However, the quality of different explanation methods has not previously been assessed for detectors of MGT. This study conducts the first systematic evaluation of explanation quality for this task. The dimensions of faithfulness and stability are assessed with five automated experiments, and usefulness is evaluated in a user study. We use a dataset of ChatGPT-generated and human-written documents, and pair predictions of three existing language-model-based detectors with the corresponding SHAP, LIME, and Anchor explanations. We find that SHAP performs best in terms of faithfulness, stability, and in helping users to predict the detector's behavior. In contrast, LIME, perceived as most useful by users, scores the worst in terms of user performance at predicting the detectors' behavior.

Read more

8/27/2024

Explaining word embeddings with perfect fidelity: Case study in research impact prediction
Total Score

0

Explaining word embeddings with perfect fidelity: Case study in research impact prediction

Lucie Dvorackova, Marcin P. Joachimiak, Michal Cerny, Adriana Kubecova, Vilem Sklenak, Tomas Kliegr

Best performing approaches for scholarly document quality prediction are based on embedding models, which do not allow direct explanation of classifiers as distinct words no longer correspond to the input features for model training. Although model-agnostic explanation methods such as Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) can be applied, these produce results with questionable correspondence to the ML model. We introduce a new feature importance method, Self-model Rated Entities (SMER), for logistic regression-based classification models trained on word embeddings. We show that SMER has theoretically perfect fidelity with the explained model, as its prediction corresponds exactly to the average of predictions for individual words in the text. SMER allows us to reliably determine which words or entities positively contribute to predicting impactful articles. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation is performed through five diverse experiments conducted on 50.000 research papers from the CORD-19 corpus. Through an AOPC curve analysis, we experimentally demonstrate that SMER produces better explanations than LIME for logistic regression.

Read more

9/25/2024

💬

Total Score

0

FaithLM: Towards Faithful Explanations for Large Language Models

Yu-Neng Chuang, Guanchu Wang, Chia-Yuan Chang, Ruixiang Tang, Shaochen Zhong, Fan Yang, Mengnan Du, Xuanting Cai, Xia Hu

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become proficient in addressing complex tasks by leveraging their extensive internal knowledge and reasoning capabilities. However, the black-box nature of these models complicates the task of explaining their decision-making processes. While recent advancements demonstrate the potential of leveraging LLMs to self-explain their predictions through natural language (NL) explanations, their explanations may not accurately reflect the LLMs' decision-making process due to a lack of fidelity optimization on the derived explanations. Measuring the fidelity of NL explanations is a challenging issue, as it is difficult to manipulate the input context to mask the semantics of these explanations. To this end, we introduce FaithLM to explain the decision of LLMs with NL explanations. Specifically, FaithLM designs a method for evaluating the fidelity of NL explanations by incorporating the contrary explanations to the query process. Moreover, FaithLM conducts an iterative process to improve the fidelity of derived explanations. Experiment results on three datasets from multiple domains demonstrate that FaithLM can significantly improve the fidelity of derived explanations, which also provides a better alignment with the ground-truth explanations.

Read more

6/27/2024