Fast Proxy Experiment Design for Causal Effect Identification

Read original: arXiv:2407.05330 - Published 7/9/2024 by Sepehr Elahi, Sina Akbari, Jalal Etesami, Negar Kiyavash, Patrick Thiran
Total Score

0

Fast Proxy Experiment Design for Causal Effect Identification

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a fast proxy experiment design for identifying causal effects
  • Leverages proxy variables to efficiently estimate causal effects without measuring all confounders
  • Proposes a sequential design that adaptively selects the most informative proxy variables to measure

Plain English Explanation

The paper addresses the challenge of identifying causal effects when there are unmeasured confounding variables. Causal discovery is an important task, but it can be difficult when there are factors that influence both the treatment and the outcome, but are not observed.

The researchers propose using proxy variables as a solution. Proxy variables are related to the unmeasured confounders, but are easier to measure. By carefully selecting which proxy variables to measure, the authors show that you can efficiently estimate the causal effect without needing to measure all the confounders directly.

Their key insight is to use a sequential experiment design that adaptively chooses which proxy variables to measure based on the data collected so far. This allows them to focus measurement efforts on the most informative proxies, leading to faster and more accurate causal effect estimates compared to a standard experiment.

The approach leverages ideas from targeted maximum likelihood estimation and conditional independence testing to rigorously identify the best proxies to measure. This allows for efficient causal effect identification even with limited data and unmeasured confounders.

Technical Explanation

The paper formulates the problem of causal effect identification with unmeasured confounders. The authors propose a fast proxy experiment design that sequentially selects the most informative proxy variables to measure in order to efficiently estimate the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome.

The key components of their approach are:

  1. Proxy Variable Selection: The method uses conditional independence testing and targeted maximum likelihood estimation to automatically identify the best proxy variables to measure from a set of candidate proxies. This selects the proxies that are most predictive of the unmeasured confounders.

  2. Sequential Experiment Design: Rather than measuring all proxy variables upfront, the design adaptively chooses which proxies to measure based on the data collected so far. This sequential approach focuses measurement efforts on the most informative proxies, leading to faster and more accurate causal effect estimates.

  3. Causal Effect Estimation: Once the relevant proxy variables have been measured, the method uses semiparametric efficient estimation techniques to obtain the final causal effect estimate. This leverages the information in the proxy variables to improve statistical efficiency compared to traditional experimental designs.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their fast proxy experiment design through both theoretical analysis and empirical simulations. They show that it can dramatically reduce the number of proxy variables that need to be measured to achieve a target level of estimation accuracy, compared to standard experiment designs.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by proposing a principled approach for efficiently identifying causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounders. The sequential experiment design is a clever way to focus measurement efforts on the most informative proxy variables, which can lead to substantial efficiency gains.

However, the approach does rely on some strong assumptions, such as the availability of a rich set of candidate proxy variables and the validity of the conditional independence relationships. In practice, it may be challenging to identify truly informative proxy variables, and violations of the assumptions could lead to biased causal effect estimates.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for proxy variables to introduce new sources of bias, such as measurement error or collider bias. Further research is needed to understand the robustness of the method to these issues and to develop strategies for mitigating them.

Despite these limitations, the fast proxy experiment design represents an important step forward in the field of causal inference. By intelligently leveraging proxy variables, the approach has the potential to significantly expand the range of settings where causal effects can be reliably estimated, even with limited data and unmeasured confounders.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel fast proxy experiment design for efficiently identifying causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounders. By adaptively selecting the most informative proxy variables to measure, the method can dramatically reduce the experimental effort required to obtain accurate causal effect estimates.

The approach combines ideas from causal discovery, targeted maximum likelihood estimation, and sequential experiment design to create a principled and practical solution to a key challenge in causal inference. While the method relies on some strong assumptions, it represents an important advance that could have significant implications for a wide range of applications where causal understanding is crucial.

As the field of causal inference continues to evolve, techniques like the fast proxy experiment design will likely play an increasingly important role in enabling robust causal effect identification, even in the face of complex and partially observed real-world systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Fast Proxy Experiment Design for Causal Effect Identification
Total Score

0

Fast Proxy Experiment Design for Causal Effect Identification

Sepehr Elahi, Sina Akbari, Jalal Etesami, Negar Kiyavash, Patrick Thiran

Identifying causal effects is a key problem of interest across many disciplines. The two long-standing approaches to estimate causal effects are observational and experimental (randomized) studies. Observational studies can suffer from unmeasured confounding, which may render the causal effects unidentifiable. On the other hand, direct experiments on the target variable may be too costly or even infeasible to conduct. A middle ground between these two approaches is to estimate the causal effect of interest through proxy experiments, which are conducted on variables with a lower cost to intervene on compared to the main target. Akbari et al. [2022] studied this setting and demonstrated that the problem of designing the optimal (minimum-cost) experiment for causal effect identification is NP-complete and provided a naive algorithm that may require solving exponentially many NP-hard problems as a sub-routine in the worst case. In this work, we provide a few reformulations of the problem that allow for designing significantly more efficient algorithms to solve it as witnessed by our extensive simulations. Additionally, we study the closely-related problem of designing experiments that enable us to identify a given effect through valid adjustments sets.

Read more

7/9/2024

Targeted Sequential Indirect Experiment Design
Total Score

0

Targeted Sequential Indirect Experiment Design

Elisabeth Ailer, Niclas Dern, Jason Hartford, Niki Kilbertus

Scientific hypotheses typically concern specific aspects of complex, imperfectly understood or entirely unknown mechanisms, such as the effect of gene expression levels on phenotypes or how microbial communities influence environmental health. Such queries are inherently causal (rather than purely associational), but in many settings, experiments can not be conducted directly on the target variables of interest, but are indirect. Therefore, they perturb the target variable, but do not remove potential confounding factors. If, additionally, the resulting experimental measurements are multi-dimensional and the studied mechanisms nonlinear, the query of interest is generally not identified. We develop an adaptive strategy to design indirect experiments that optimally inform a targeted query about the ground truth mechanism in terms of sequentially narrowing the gap between an upper and lower bound on the query. While the general formulation consists of a bi-level optimization procedure, we derive an efficiently estimable analytical kernel-based estimator of the bounds for the causal effect, a query of key interest, and demonstrate the efficacy of our approach in confounded, multivariate, nonlinear synthetic settings.

Read more

5/31/2024

🧪

Total Score

0

Automating the Selection of Proxy Variables of Unmeasured Confounders

Feng Xie, Zhengming Chen, Shanshan Luo, Wang Miao, Ruichu Cai, Zhi Geng

Recently, interest has grown in the use of proxy variables of unobserved confounding for inferring the causal effect in the presence of unmeasured confounders from observational data. One difficulty inhibiting the practical use is finding valid proxy variables of unobserved confounding to a target causal effect of interest. These proxy variables are typically justified by background knowledge. In this paper, we investigate the estimation of causal effects among multiple treatments and a single outcome, all of which are affected by unmeasured confounders, within a linear causal model, without prior knowledge of the validity of proxy variables. To be more specific, we first extend the existing proxy variable estimator, originally addressing a single unmeasured confounder, to accommodate scenarios where multiple unmeasured confounders exist between the treatments and the outcome. Subsequently, we present two different sets of precise identifiability conditions for selecting valid proxy variables of unmeasured confounders, based on the second-order statistics and higher-order statistics of the data, respectively. Moreover, we propose two data-driven methods for the selection of proxy variables and for the unbiased estimation of causal effects. Theoretical analysis demonstrates the correctness of our proposed algorithms. Experimental results on both synthetic and real-world data show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Read more

5/28/2024

Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
Total Score

0

Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery

Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Lai Wei, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi

Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs by leveraging observational, interventional data, or their combination. The majority of existing causal discovery methods are developed assuming infinite interventional data. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning, inspired by pure exploration in bandit problems. A graph separating system, consisting of interventions that cut every edge of the graph at least once, is sufficient for learning causal graphs when infinite interventional data is available, even in the worst case. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system via allocation matching and learns the causal graph based on sampling history. Given any desired confidence value, the algorithm determines a termination condition and runs until it is met. We analyze the algorithm to establish a problem-dependent upper bound on the expected number of required interventional samples. Our proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in simulations across various randomly generated causal graphs. It achieves higher accuracy, measured by the structural hamming distance (SHD) between the learned causal graph and the ground truth, with significantly fewer samples.

Read more

6/26/2024