Targeted Sequential Indirect Experiment Design

Read original: arXiv:2405.19985 - Published 5/31/2024 by Elisabeth Ailer, Niclas Dern, Jason Hartford, Niki Kilbertus
Total Score

0

Targeted Sequential Indirect Experiment Design

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

Plain English Explanation

This paper presents a new way to design experiments that can efficiently uncover causal relationships between different factors or variables. The key idea is to take a "targeted" and "sequential" approach, where experiments are carefully designed and adapted over time to focus on the most important causal relationships.

Rather than running a single large experiment, the method involves running a series of smaller, more targeted experiments. After each experiment, the results are used to update the understanding of the causal relationships, and the next experiment is designed accordingly. This allows the experiments to home in on the most important causal links in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

The method builds on previous work in areas like adaptive online experimental design, simultaneous inference with unmeasured confounders, and gradient-based intervention targeting. It also draws from the literature on optimal experimental design and Bayesian adaptive calibration. The result is a framework that can be applied to a wide range of real-world scenarios where discovering causal relationships is important.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a "Targeted Sequential Indirect Experiment Design" (TSIED) framework for efficiently discovering causal relationships through a series of carefully designed experiments. The key elements include:

  • Targeted Experiments: Rather than running a single large experiment, TSIED involves a sequence of smaller, more targeted experiments that focus on the most important causal relationships.
  • Sequential Adaptation: After each experiment, the results are used to update the understanding of the causal structure and inform the design of the next experiment in the sequence.
  • Indirect Interventions: TSIED leverages indirect interventions, where the experiments manipulate the environment or context to influence the causal relationships, rather than directly intervening on the variables of interest.

The framework builds on prior work in areas like adaptive online experimental design for causal discovery, simultaneous inference in generalized linear models with unmeasured confounders, and trust-your-gradient-based intervention targeting.

The authors also incorporate ideas from the literature on optimal design of experiments in the context of machine learning interventions and Bayesian adaptive calibration to develop a comprehensive framework for TSIED.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach for efficiently discovering causal relationships through a targeted and sequential experimental design. The authors have done a thorough job of building upon and integrating relevant prior work in this area.

One potential limitation is the reliance on indirect interventions, which may not always be feasible or appropriate in real-world scenarios. There could be cases where directly intervening on the variables of interest is necessary or more practical. The authors acknowledge this and suggest exploring hybrid approaches that combine direct and indirect interventions.

Additionally, the paper does not deeply address the potential challenges of scaling the TSIED framework to larger, more complex systems with many variables and causal relationships. Exploring the scalability and computational efficiency of the approach would be an important area for further research.

Overall, the TSIED framework appears to be a promising contribution to the field of causal discovery, with the potential to significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of experimental design in a wide range of applications. Further empirical validation and exploration of the method's strengths and limitations would be valuable next steps.

Conclusion

The "Targeted Sequential Indirect Experiment Design" (TSIED) framework presented in this paper offers a novel approach for efficiently discovering causal relationships through a series of carefully designed and adapted experiments. By leveraging indirect interventions and a sequential, adaptive design, the method can home in on the most important causal links in a cost-effective manner.

The paper builds on and integrates relevant prior work in areas like adaptive online experimental design, simultaneous inference with unmeasured confounders, gradient-based intervention targeting, optimal experimental design, and Bayesian adaptive calibration. This comprehensive approach provides a strong foundation for the TSIED framework and its potential applications.

While the reliance on indirect interventions and the scalability to larger, more complex systems are potential limitations that warrant further exploration, the TSIED framework represents a significant advancement in the field of causal discovery. Its ability to efficiently uncover causal relationships could have important implications for a wide range of domains, from scientific research to policy decision-making and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Targeted Sequential Indirect Experiment Design
Total Score

0

Targeted Sequential Indirect Experiment Design

Elisabeth Ailer, Niclas Dern, Jason Hartford, Niki Kilbertus

Scientific hypotheses typically concern specific aspects of complex, imperfectly understood or entirely unknown mechanisms, such as the effect of gene expression levels on phenotypes or how microbial communities influence environmental health. Such queries are inherently causal (rather than purely associational), but in many settings, experiments can not be conducted directly on the target variables of interest, but are indirect. Therefore, they perturb the target variable, but do not remove potential confounding factors. If, additionally, the resulting experimental measurements are multi-dimensional and the studied mechanisms nonlinear, the query of interest is generally not identified. We develop an adaptive strategy to design indirect experiments that optimally inform a targeted query about the ground truth mechanism in terms of sequentially narrowing the gap between an upper and lower bound on the query. While the general formulation consists of a bi-level optimization procedure, we derive an efficiently estimable analytical kernel-based estimator of the bounds for the causal effect, a query of key interest, and demonstrate the efficacy of our approach in confounded, multivariate, nonlinear synthetic settings.

Read more

5/31/2024

Fast Proxy Experiment Design for Causal Effect Identification
Total Score

0

Fast Proxy Experiment Design for Causal Effect Identification

Sepehr Elahi, Sina Akbari, Jalal Etesami, Negar Kiyavash, Patrick Thiran

Identifying causal effects is a key problem of interest across many disciplines. The two long-standing approaches to estimate causal effects are observational and experimental (randomized) studies. Observational studies can suffer from unmeasured confounding, which may render the causal effects unidentifiable. On the other hand, direct experiments on the target variable may be too costly or even infeasible to conduct. A middle ground between these two approaches is to estimate the causal effect of interest through proxy experiments, which are conducted on variables with a lower cost to intervene on compared to the main target. Akbari et al. [2022] studied this setting and demonstrated that the problem of designing the optimal (minimum-cost) experiment for causal effect identification is NP-complete and provided a naive algorithm that may require solving exponentially many NP-hard problems as a sub-routine in the worst case. In this work, we provide a few reformulations of the problem that allow for designing significantly more efficient algorithms to solve it as witnessed by our extensive simulations. Additionally, we study the closely-related problem of designing experiments that enable us to identify a given effect through valid adjustments sets.

Read more

7/9/2024

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

Targeted Cause Discovery with Data-Driven Learning

Jang-Hyun Kim, Claudia Skok Gibbs, Sangdoo Yun, Hyun Oh Song, Kyunghyun Cho

We propose a novel machine learning approach for inferring causal variables of a target variable from observations. Our goal is to identify both direct and indirect causes within a system, thereby efficiently regulating the target variable when the difficulty and cost of intervening on each causal variable vary. Our method employs a neural network trained to identify causality through supervised learning on simulated data. By implementing a local-inference strategy, we achieve linear complexity with respect to the number of variables, efficiently scaling up to thousands of variables. Empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in identifying causal relationships within large-scale gene regulatory networks, outperforming existing causal discovery methods that primarily focus on direct causality. We validate our model's generalization capability across novel graph structures and generating mechanisms, including gene regulatory networks of E. coli and the human K562 cell line. Implementation codes are available at https://github.com/snu-mllab/Targeted-Cause-Discovery.

Read more

8/30/2024

Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
Total Score

0

Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery

Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Lai Wei, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi

Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs by leveraging observational, interventional data, or their combination. The majority of existing causal discovery methods are developed assuming infinite interventional data. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning, inspired by pure exploration in bandit problems. A graph separating system, consisting of interventions that cut every edge of the graph at least once, is sufficient for learning causal graphs when infinite interventional data is available, even in the worst case. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system via allocation matching and learns the causal graph based on sampling history. Given any desired confidence value, the algorithm determines a termination condition and runs until it is met. We analyze the algorithm to establish a problem-dependent upper bound on the expected number of required interventional samples. Our proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in simulations across various randomly generated causal graphs. It achieves higher accuracy, measured by the structural hamming distance (SHD) between the learned causal graph and the ground truth, with significantly fewer samples.

Read more

6/26/2024