Robotic deployment on construction sites: considerations for safety and productivity impact
0
Sign in to get full access
Insights from the Industry
Overview
- Examines the considerations around deploying robots on construction sites
- Focuses on safety and productivity impacts
- Explores industry standards and guidance for robot use in construction
Plain English Explanation
This research paper looks at the challenges and opportunities of using robots on construction sites. Construction sites can be dangerous places, with many potential hazards for workers. Robots could help improve safety by taking on risky tasks. However, there are also concerns about how robots might impact worker productivity and job security. The paper reviews industry standards and best practices for safely integrating robots into construction workflows. It provides insights from construction professionals on the real-world considerations around deploying robots on construction sites.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the deployment of robots on construction sites, with a focus on safety and productivity impacts. It reviews relevant industry standards and guidance around the use of robots in construction, including standards for robot safety monitoring and automated real-time inspection.
The authors conducted interviews with construction professionals to gain insights into the practical challenges and considerations around integrating robots into construction workflows. Key topics discussed include robot navigation, human-robot collaboration, and the potential impacts on worker productivity and job security.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable overview of the current state of robot deployment in the construction industry. However, it acknowledges several limitations, such as the small sample size of interviews and the rapidly evolving nature of construction robotics technology.
The authors also note that further research is needed to fully understand the long-term impacts of construction robots on worker safety, productivity, and employment. Potential issues, such as robot malfunctions or unintended interactions with workers, would also benefit from more in-depth investigation.
Overall, the paper serves as a useful starting point for understanding the practical considerations around deploying unconventional field robotics in the construction industry. However, continued collaboration between researchers, industry experts, and policymakers will be essential to ensure that the benefits of construction robotics are realized while mitigating any negative consequences.
Conclusion
This research paper explores the deployment of robots on construction sites, focusing on the impacts on safety and productivity. By reviewing industry standards and gathering insights from construction professionals, the authors provide a comprehensive look at the practical considerations around integrating robots into construction workflows. While the use of robots holds promise for improving safety and efficiency, the paper highlights the need for further research and collaboration to fully understand the long-term implications for workers and the industry as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Robotic deployment on construction sites: considerations for safety and productivity impact
Rafael Gomes Braga, Muhammad Owais Tahir, Ivanka Iordanova, David St-Onge
Deploying mobile robots in construction sites to collaborate with workers or perform automated tasks such as surveillance and inspections carries the potential to greatly increase productivity, reduce human errors, and save costs. However ensuring human safety is a major concern, and the rough and dynamic construction environments pose multiple challenges for robot deployment. In this paper, we present the insights we obtained from our collaborations with construction companies in Canada and discuss our experiences deploying a semi-autonomous mobile robot in real construction scenarios.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Collaborating for Success: Optimizing System Efficiency and Resilience Under Agile Industrial Settings
Sunny Katyara, Suchita Sharma, Praveen Damacharla, Carlos Garcia Santiago, Francis O'Farrell, Philip Long
Designing an efficient and resilient human-robot collaboration strategy that not only upholds the safety and ergonomics of shared workspace but also enhances the performance and agility of collaborative setup presents significant challenges concerning environment perception and robot control. In this research, we introduce a novel approach for collaborative environment monitoring and robot motion regulation to address this multifaceted problem. Our study proposes novel computation and division of safety monitoring zones, adhering to ISO 13855 and TS 15066 standards, utilizing 2D lasers information. These zones are not only configured in the standard three-layer arrangement but are also expanded into two adjacent quadrants, thereby enhancing system uptime and preventing unnecessary deadlocks. Moreover, we also leverage 3D visual information to track dynamic human articulations and extended intrusions. Drawing upon the fused sensory data from 2D and 3D perceptual spaces, our proposed hierarchical controller stably regulates robot velocity, validated using Lasalle in-variance principle. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our approach significantly reduces task execution time and system response delay, resulting in improved efficiency and resilience within collaborative settings.
Read more9/14/2024
๐งช
0
A quantitative investigation for deployment of mobile collaborative robots in high-value manufacturing
Amine Hifi, W. Jackson, C. Loukas, M. Shields, A. Poole, E. Mohseni, C. N. MacLeod, G. Dobie, S. G. Pierce, T. O'Hare, G. Munro, J. O'Brian-O'Reilly, R. W. K. Vithanage
Component inspection is often the bottleneck in high-value manufacturing, driving industries like aerospace toward automated inspection technologies. Current systems often employ fixed arm robots, but they lack the flexibility in adapting to new components or orientations Advanced mobile robotic platforms with updated sensor technologies and algorithms have improved localization and path planning capabilities, making them ideal for bringing inspection processes directly to parts. However, mobile platforms introduce challenges in localization and maneuverability, leading to potential errors. Their positional uncertainty is higher than fixed systems due to the lack of a fixed calibrated location, posing challenges for position-sensitive inspection sensors. Therefore, it's essential to assess the positional accuracy and repeatability of mobile manipulator platforms. The KUKA KMR iiwa was chosen for its collaborative features, robust build, and scalability within the KUKA product range. The accuracy and repeatability of the mobile platform were evaluated through a series of tests to evaluate the performance of its integrated feature mapping, the effect of various speeds on positional accuracy, and the efficiency of the omnidirectional wheels for a range of translation orientations. Experimental evaluation revealed that enabling feature mapping substantially improves the KUKA KMR iiwa's performance, with accuracy gains and error reductions exceeding 90%. Repeatability errors were under 7 mm with mapping activated and around 2.5 mm in practical scenarios, demonstrating that mobile manipulators, incorporating both the manipulator and platform, can fulfil the precise requirements of industries with high precision needs. Providing a highly diverse alternative to traditional fixed-base industrial manipulators.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Human-Cobot collaboration's impact on success, time completion, errors, workload, gestures and acceptability during an assembly task
'Etienne Fournier, Christine Jeoffrion, Belal Hmedan, Damien Pellier, Humbert Fiorino, Aur'elie Landry
The 5.0 industry promotes collaborative robots (cobots). This research studies the impacts of cobot collaboration using an experimental setup. 120 participants realized a simple and a complex assembly task. 50% collaborated with another human (H/H) and 50% with a cobot (H/C). The workload and the acceptability of the cobotic collaboration were measured. Working with a cobot decreases the effect of the task complexity on the human workload and on the output quality. However, it increases the time completion and the number of gestures (while decreasing their frequency). The H/C couples have a higher chance of success but they take more time and more gestures to realize the task. The results of this research could help developers and stakeholders to understand the impacts of implementing a cobot in production chains.
Read more5/29/2024