Find the Assembly Mistakes: Error Segmentation for Industrial Applications

Read original: arXiv:2408.12945 - Published 8/26/2024 by Dan Lehman, Tim J. Schoonbeek, Shao-Hsuan Hung, Jacek Kustra, Peter H. N. de With, Fons van der Sommen

Find the Assembly Mistakes: Error Segmentation for Industrial Applications

Overview

This paper presents a new approach for detecting and localizing assembly errors in industrial settings.
The proposed method uses computer vision techniques to identify and segment faulty components within an assembly process.
The research aims to improve quality control and reduce costly mistakes in manufacturing environments.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a new computer vision system that can identify assembly errors in industrial settings. The key idea is to use cameras to continuously monitor the assembly process and automatically detect when a component is incorrectly installed or assembled.

This is an important problem because assembly mistakes can be very costly for manufacturers, leading to product defects, equipment damage, and production delays. By catching these errors early, companies can improve quality control and avoid the time and expense of reworking or scrapping entire products.

The researchers developed a neural network-based system that can analyze images of the assembly process and identify the specific components or areas where mistakes have occurred. This allows workers to quickly locate and fix the problem, rather than having to visually inspect every step of a complex assembly line.

Overall, this technology has the potential to make manufacturing more efficient and reliable, by automatically detecting and localizing assembly errors before they cascade into bigger issues.

Technical Explanation

The paper describes a deep learning-based approach for detecting and segmenting assembly errors in industrial settings. The key technical contributions include:

Architecture Design: The researchers developed a novel neural network architecture that takes in images of the assembly process and outputs a segmentation map highlighting areas with potential errors.
Multi-task Learning: The model is trained to simultaneously classify the overall assembly state (correct vs. incorrect) and localize the specific faulty components.
Error Simulation: To train the model, the authors created a dataset of simulated assembly errors by virtually inserting mistakes into otherwise correct assembly configurations.
Evaluation: The proposed system was evaluated on both simulated and real-world assembly data, demonstrating strong performance in accurately detecting and localizing errors.

The technical details and experimental results suggest this approach could be a valuable tool for improving quality control and reducing costly mistakes in industrial manufacturing environments.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough technical description of the proposed assembly error detection system and presents compelling experimental results. However, a few potential limitations or areas for further research are worth considering:

Real-world Deployment Challenges: While the system performs well on the evaluated datasets, transitioning to full-scale industrial deployment may present additional challenges, such as accounting for variability in lighting, camera angles, or assembly configurations.
Interpretability and Explainability: As a deep learning-based approach, the inner workings of the model may be difficult to interpret. Providing more transparency around how the system identifies and localizes errors could increase trust and adoption in industrial settings.
Generalization and Adaptation: The current approach relies on simulated error data for training. Exploring techniques to enable the model to generalize to novel assembly processes or adapt to changing production environments could enhance its real-world applicability.
Human-AI Collaboration: Integrating this error detection system into the broader manufacturing workflow and understanding how it can best complement human inspectors is an important consideration for future research.

Overall, this work represents a promising step towards improving quality control in industrial applications, but continued research and development will be needed to realize the full potential of this technology.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel computer vision-based approach for detecting and localizing assembly errors in industrial settings. By using deep learning techniques to analyze images of the assembly process, the proposed system can automatically identify and segment faulty components, enabling faster problem resolution and improved quality control.

The technical details and experimental results suggest this technology has the potential to significantly reduce costly mistakes and enhance the efficiency of manufacturing workflows. While some challenges remain, this research represents an important advance towards more robust and intelligent quality assurance systems for industrial applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Find the Assembly Mistakes: Error Segmentation for Industrial Applications

Dan Lehman, Tim J. Schoonbeek, Shao-Hsuan Hung, Jacek Kustra, Peter H. N. de With, Fons van der Sommen

Recognizing errors in assembly and maintenance procedures is valuable for industrial applications, since it can increase worker efficiency and prevent unplanned down-time. Although assembly state recognition is gaining attention, none of the current works investigate assembly error localization. Therefore, we propose StateDiffNet, which localizes assembly errors based on detecting the differences between a (correct) intended assembly state and a test image from a similar viewpoint. StateDiffNet is trained on synthetically generated image pairs, providing full control over the type of meaningful change that should be detected. The proposed approach is the first to correctly localize assembly errors taken from real ego-centric video data for both states and error types that are never presented during training. Furthermore, the deployment of change detection to this industrial application provides valuable insights and considerations into the mechanisms of state-of-the-art change detection algorithms. The code and data generation pipeline are publicly available at: https://timschoonbeek.github.io/error_seg.

8/26/2024

Supervised Representation Learning towards Generalizable Assembly State Recognition

Tim J. Schoonbeek, Goutham Balachandran, Hans Onvlee, Tim Houben, Shao-Hsuan Hung, Jacek Kustra, Peter H. N. de With, Fons van der Sommen

Assembly state recognition facilitates the execution of assembly procedures, offering feedback to enhance efficiency and minimize errors. However, recognizing assembly states poses challenges in scalability, since parts are frequently updated, and the robustness to execution errors remains underexplored. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an approach based on representation learning and the novel intermediate-state informed loss function modification (ISIL). ISIL leverages unlabeled transitions between states and demonstrates significant improvements in clustering and classification performance for all tested architectures and losses. Despite being trained exclusively on images without execution errors, thorough analysis on error states demonstrates that our approach accurately distinguishes between correct states and states with various types of execution errors. The integration of the proposed algorithm can offer meaningful assistance to workers and mitigate unexpected losses due to procedural mishaps in industrial settings. The code is available at: https://timschoonbeek.github.io/state_rec

8/22/2024

ASDF: Assembly State Detection Utilizing Late Fusion by Integrating 6D Pose Estimation

Hannah Schieber, Shiyu Li, Niklas Corell, Philipp Beckerle, Julian Kreimeier, Daniel Roth

In medical and industrial domains, providing guidance for assembly processes can be critical to ensure efficiency and safety. Errors in assembly can lead to significant consequences such as extended surgery times and prolonged manufacturing or maintenance times in industry. Assembly scenarios can benefit from in-situ augmented reality visualization, i.e., augmentations in close proximity to the target object, to provide guidance, reduce assembly times, and minimize errors. In order to enable in-situ visualization, 6D pose estimation can be leveraged to identify the correct location for an augmentation. Existing 6D pose estimation techniques primarily focus on individual objects and static captures. However, assembly scenarios have various dynamics, including occlusion during assembly and dynamics in the appearance of assembly objects. Existing work focus either on object detection combined with state detection, or focus purely on the pose estimation. To address the challenges of 6D pose estimation in combination with assembly state detection, our approach ASDF builds upon the strengths of YOLOv8, a real-time capable object detection framework. We extend this framework, refine the object pose, and fuse pose knowledge with network-detected pose information. Utilizing our late fusion in our Pose2State module results in refined 6D pose estimation and assembly state detection. By combining both pose and state information, our Pose2State module predicts the final assembly state with precision. The evaluation of our ASDF dataset shows that our Pose2State module leads to an improved assembly state detection and that the improvement of the assembly state further leads to a more robust 6D pose estimation. Moreover, on the GBOT dataset, we outperform the pure deep learning-based network and even outperform the hybrid and pure tracking-based approaches.

8/12/2024

🔎

Automated Detection of Label Errors in Semantic Segmentation Datasets via Deep Learning and Uncertainty Quantification

Matthias Rottmann, Marco Reese

In this work, we for the first time present a method for detecting label errors in image datasets with semantic segmentation, i.e., pixel-wise class labels. Annotation acquisition for semantic segmentation datasets is time-consuming and requires plenty of human labor. In particular, review processes are time consuming and label errors can easily be overlooked by humans. The consequences are biased benchmarks and in extreme cases also performance degradation of deep neural networks (DNNs) trained on such datasets. DNNs for semantic segmentation yield pixel-wise predictions, which makes detection of label errors via uncertainty quantification a complex task. Uncertainty is particularly pronounced at the transitions between connected components of the prediction. By lifting the consideration of uncertainty to the level of predicted components, we enable the usage of DNNs together with component-level uncertainty quantification for the detection of label errors. We present a principled approach to benchmarking the task of label error detection by dropping labels from the Cityscapes dataset as well from a dataset extracted from the CARLA driving simulator, where in the latter case we have the labels under control. Our experiments show that our approach is able to detect the vast majority of label errors while controlling the number of false label error detections. Furthermore, we apply our method to semantic segmentation datasets frequently used by the computer vision community and present a collection of label errors along with sample statistics.

8/27/2024