A Framework for Interpretability in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging
2310.01685
0
0
Abstract
Interpretability for machine learning models in medical imaging (MLMI) is an important direction of research. However, there is a general sense of murkiness in what interpretability means. Why does the need for interpretability in MLMI arise? What goals does one actually seek to address when interpretability is needed? To answer these questions, we identify a need to formalize the goals and elements of interpretability in MLMI. By reasoning about real-world tasks and goals common in both medical image analysis and its intersection with machine learning, we identify five core elements of interpretability: localization, visual recognizability, physical attribution, model transparency, and actionability. From this, we arrive at a framework for interpretability in MLMI, which serves as a step-by-step guide to approaching interpretability in this context. Overall, this paper formalizes interpretability needs in the context of medical imaging, and our applied perspective clarifies concrete MLMI-specific goals and considerations in order to guide method design and improve real-world usage. Our goal is to provide practical and didactic information for model designers and practitioners, inspire developers of models in the medical imaging field to reason more deeply about what interpretability is achieving, and suggest future directions of interpretability research.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Presents a framework for making machine learning models in medical imaging more interpretable
- Aims to enhance trust and understanding of these models by healthcare providers and patients
- Covers key concepts of interpretability and explainability in AI systems
Plain English Explanation
This paper discusses a framework for making machine learning models used in medical imaging more interpretable and explainable. The goal is to increase the trust and understanding of these models among healthcare providers and patients.
The authors recognize that as machine learning becomes more widely adopted in medical imaging, it's important that the decision-making process of these models is transparent and understandable. This framework aims to provide a systematic way to design interpretable AI systems for medical applications.
By making the models more interpretable, the researchers hope to build confidence in the technology and facilitate better collaboration between AI systems and human experts. This could lead to more informed decision-making and improved patient outcomes.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a conceptual framework for designing interpretable machine learning models for medical imaging tasks. The framework consists of three key components:
-
Model Interpretability: Techniques to make the inner workings of the machine learning model transparent and understandable, such as using prototypes or probabilistic modeling.
-
Explanations: Methods to generate explanations for the model's predictions, such as highlighting the most important features or visualizing salient regions in the input image.
-
Interaction and Feedback: Allowing healthcare providers to interact with the model, provide feedback, and steer the model's decision-making process to better align with their domain knowledge and clinical expertise.
The paper discusses how these components can be integrated into the design of interpretable AI systems for medical imaging applications. The authors also outline several technical challenges and research directions in this area.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-structured and comprehensive framework for enhancing the interpretability of machine learning models in medical imaging. The authors have clearly identified the importance of interpretability in building trust and facilitating collaboration between AI systems and human experts.
However, the paper does not provide detailed implementation details or case studies, which would have been helpful to fully evaluate the proposed framework. Additionally, the authors could have discussed potential limitations or unintended consequences of making models more interpretable, such as the trade-off between interpretability and model performance.
Further research could also explore how this framework can be extended to other medical domains beyond imaging, and how to seamlessly integrate interpretable AI systems into the clinical workflow.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive framework for designing interpretable machine learning models for medical imaging applications. By focusing on model interpretability, meaningful explanations, and interactive feedback, the authors aim to build trust and enhance collaboration between AI systems and healthcare providers.
While the conceptual framework is well-structured, the paper would have benefited from more implementation details and a deeper discussion of potential limitations and future research directions. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step towards making AI more transparent and trustworthy in the critical domain of healthcare.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐ง
Selecting Interpretability Techniques for Healthcare Machine Learning models
Daniel Sierra-Botero, Ana Molina-Taborda, Mario S. Vald'es-Tresanco, Alejandro Hern'andez-Arango, Leonardo Espinosa-Leal, Alexander Karpenko, Olga Lopez-Acevedo
0
0
In healthcare there is a pursuit for employing interpretable algorithms to assist healthcare professionals in several decision scenarios. Following the Predictive, Descriptive and Relevant (PDR) framework, the definition of interpretable machine learning as a machine-learning model that explicitly and in a simple frame determines relationships either contained in data or learned by the model that are relevant for its functioning and the categorization of models by post-hoc, acquiring interpretability after training, or model-based, being intrinsically embedded in the algorithm design. We overview a selection of eight algorithms, both post-hoc and model-based, that can be used for such purposes.
6/17/2024
๐ท๏ธ
Designing Interpretable ML System to Enhance Trust in Healthcare: A Systematic Review to Proposed Responsible Clinician-AI-Collaboration Framework
Elham Nasarian, Roohallah Alizadehsani, U. Rajendra Acharya, Kwok-Leung Tsui
0
0
This paper explores the significant impact of AI-based medical devices, including wearables, telemedicine, large language models, and digital twins, on clinical decision support systems. It emphasizes the importance of producing outcomes that are not only accurate but also interpretable and understandable to clinicians, addressing the risk that lack of interpretability poses in terms of mistrust and reluctance to adopt these technologies in healthcare. The paper reviews interpretable AI processes, methods, applications, and the challenges of implementation in healthcare, focusing on quality control to facilitate responsible communication between AI systems and clinicians. It breaks down the interpretability process into data pre-processing, model selection, and post-processing, aiming to foster a comprehensive understanding of the crucial role of a robust interpretability approach in healthcare and to guide future research in this area. with insights for creating responsible clinician-AI tools for healthcare, as well as to offer a deeper understanding of the challenges they might face. Our research questions, eligibility criteria and primary goals were identified using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline and PICO method; PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were systematically searched using sensitive and specific search strings. In the end, 52 publications were selected for data extraction which included 8 existing reviews and 44 related experimental studies. The paper offers general concepts of interpretable AI in healthcare and discuss three-levels interpretability process. Additionally, it provides a comprehensive discussion of evaluating robust interpretability AI in healthcare. Moreover, this survey introduces a step-by-step roadmap for implementing responsible AI in healthcare.
4/11/2024
๐งช
Towards a Unified Framework for Evaluating Explanations
Juan D. Pinto, Luc Paquette
0
0
The challenge of creating interpretable models has been taken up by two main research communities: ML researchers primarily focused on lower-level explainability methods that suit the needs of engineers, and HCI researchers who have more heavily emphasized user-centered approaches often based on participatory design methods. This paper reviews how these communities have evaluated interpretability, identifying overlaps and semantic misalignments. We propose moving towards a unified framework of evaluation criteria and lay the groundwork for such a framework by articulating the relationships between existing criteria. We argue that explanations serve as mediators between models and stakeholders, whether for intrinsically interpretable models or opaque black-box models analyzed via post-hoc techniques. We further argue that useful explanations require both faithfulness and intelligibility. Explanation plausibility is a prerequisite for intelligibility, while stability is a prerequisite for explanation faithfulness. We illustrate these criteria, as well as specific evaluation methods, using examples from an ongoing study of an interpretable neural network for predicting a particular learner behavior.
5/24/2024
From Neurons to Neutrons: A Case Study in Interpretability
Ouail Kitouni, Niklas Nolte, V'ictor Samuel P'erez-D'iaz, Sokratis Trifinopoulos, Mike Williams
0
0
Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) promises a path toward fully understanding how neural networks make their predictions. Prior work demonstrates that even when trained to perform simple arithmetic, models can implement a variety of algorithms (sometimes concurrently) depending on initialization and hyperparameters. Does this mean neuron-level interpretability techniques have limited applicability? We argue that high-dimensional neural networks can learn low-dimensional representations of their training data that are useful beyond simply making good predictions. Such representations can be understood through the mechanistic interpretability lens and provide insights that are surprisingly faithful to human-derived domain knowledge. This indicates that such approaches to interpretability can be useful for deriving a new understanding of a problem from models trained to solve it. As a case study, we extract nuclear physics concepts by studying models trained to reproduce nuclear data.
5/28/2024