Generate then Retrieve: Conversational Response Retrieval Using LLMs as Answer and Query Generators
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to conversational response retrieval using large language models (LLMs) as both answer and query generators.
- The proposed "Generate then Retrieve" framework aims to improve the quality and relevance of responses in conversational AI systems.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on benchmark datasets, showing improvements over existing retrieval-based methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way to build conversational AI systems that can provide more relevant and high-quality responses. Typically, these systems use a retrieval-based approach, where they search a database of pre-written responses and select the one that best matches the user's message. However, this can sometimes result in responses that don't fully address the user's intent.
The researchers in this paper propose a different approach, called "Generate then Retrieve." Here, they use LLMs - powerful AI language models - to first generate a potential response to the user's message. They then use that generated response to search a database and find the most relevant pre-written response to return to the user.
By using the LLM to generate a response first, the system can better understand the user's intent and retrieve a more relevant and helpful response. The authors show that this approach outperforms traditional retrieval-based methods on standard evaluation datasets.
This research is important because it can help improve the quality and usefulness of conversational AI systems, such as those used in customer service chatbots or virtual assistants. By providing more relevant and satisfying responses, these systems can better meet users' needs and provide a more natural, human-like interaction.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a "Generate then Retrieve" framework for conversational response retrieval. The key idea is to use an LLM to first generate a candidate response to the user's input, and then use that generated response to retrieve the most relevant pre-written response from a database.
Specifically, the system consists of two main components:
- Answer Generator: An LLM that generates a candidate response to the user's input message.
- Query Generator: Another LLM that takes the generated candidate response and uses it to construct a more effective retrieval query.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on standard conversational response retrieval benchmarks, showing that it outperforms traditional retrieval-only methods. They also provide detailed ablation studies to understand the contributions of the different components of their system.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and insightful study on improving conversational response retrieval using LLMs. The "Generate then Retrieve" approach is a clever way to leverage the strengths of language models in both understanding the user's intent and retrieving relevant responses.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the proposed approach. For example, the quality of the retrieved responses is still dependent on the quality and coverage of the underlying response database. If the database does not contain a suitable response for a given user input, the system may still struggle to provide a satisfactory answer.
Additionally, the authors do not discuss the computational cost and inference time of their approach, which could be an important consideration for real-world deployments of conversational AI systems.
Overall, the paper presents a promising new direction for conversational response retrieval, but further research is needed to address these potential limitations and explore the broader applicability of the "Generate then Retrieve" framework.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel "Generate then Retrieve" approach for improving conversational response retrieval using LLMs. By leveraging LLMs to both generate candidate responses and construct effective retrieval queries, the system can provide more relevant and high-quality responses to users.
The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, and the paper makes an important contribution to the field of conversational AI. While the proposed framework has some potential limitations, it represents a significant step forward in enhancing the capabilities of conversational systems to better understand and address user needs.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Generate then Retrieve: Conversational Response Retrieval Using LLMs as Answer and Query Generators
Zahra Abbasiantaeb, Mohammad Aliannejadi
CIS is a prominent area in IR which focuses on developing interactive knowledge assistants. These systems must adeptly comprehend the user's information requirements within the conversational context and retrieve the relevant information. To this aim, the existing approaches model the user's information needs by generating a single query rewrite or a single representation of the query in the query space embedding. However, to answer complex questions, a single query rewrite or representation is often ineffective. To address this, a system needs to do reasoning over multiple passages. In this work, we propose using a generate-then-retrieve approach to improve the passage retrieval performance for complex user queries. In this approach, we utilize large language models (LLMs) to (i) generate an initial answer to the user's information need by doing reasoning over the context of the conversation, and (ii) ground this answer to the collection. Based on the experiments, our proposed approach significantly improves the retrieval performance on TREC iKAT 23, TREC CAsT 20 and 22 datasets, under various setups. Also, we show that grounding the LLM's answer requires more than one searchable query, where an average of 3 queries outperforms human rewrites.
Read more6/27/2024
🛸
0
When to Retrieve: Teaching LLMs to Utilize Information Retrieval Effectively
Tiziano Labruna, Jon Ander Campos, Gorka Azkune
In this paper, we demonstrate how Large Language Models (LLMs) can effectively learn to use an off-the-shelf information retrieval (IR) system specifically when additional context is required to answer a given question. Given the performance of IR systems, the optimal strategy for question answering does not always entail external information retrieval; rather, it often involves leveraging the parametric memory of the LLM itself. Prior research has identified this phenomenon in the PopQA dataset, wherein the most popular questions are effectively addressed using the LLM's parametric memory, while less popular ones require IR system usage. Following this, we propose a tailored training approach for LLMs, leveraging existing open-domain question answering datasets. Here, LLMs are trained to generate a special token, , when they do not know the answer to a question. Our evaluation of the Adaptive Retrieval LLM (Adapt-LLM) on the PopQA dataset showcases improvements over the same LLM under three configurations: (i) retrieving information for all the questions, (ii) using always the parametric memory of the LLM, and (iii) using a popularity threshold to decide when to use a retriever. Through our analysis, we demonstrate that Adapt-LLM is able to generate the token when it determines that it does not know how to answer a question, indicating the need for IR, while it achieves notably high accuracy levels when it chooses to rely only on its parametric memory.
Read more5/8/2024
✨
0
Evaluating the Retrieval Component in LLM-Based Question Answering Systems
Ashkan Alinejad, Krtin Kumar, Ali Vahdat
Question answering systems (QA) utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) heavily depend on the retrieval component to provide them with domain-specific information and reduce the risk of generating inaccurate responses or hallucinations. Although the evaluation of retrievers dates back to the early research in Information Retrieval, assessing their performance within LLM-based chatbots remains a challenge. This study proposes a straightforward baseline for evaluating retrievers in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based chatbots. Our findings demonstrate that this evaluation framework provides a better image of how the retriever performs and is more aligned with the overall performance of the QA system. Although conventional metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score may not fully capture LLMs' capabilities - as they can yield accurate responses despite imperfect retrievers - our method considers LLMs' strengths to ignore irrelevant contexts, as well as potential errors and hallucinations in their responses.
Read more6/11/2024
💬
1
Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Survey
Yutao Zhu, Huaying Yuan, Shuting Wang, Jiongnan Liu, Wenhan Liu, Chenlong Deng, Haonan Chen, Zheng Liu, Zhicheng Dou, Ji-Rong Wen
As a primary means of information acquisition, information retrieval (IR) systems, such as search engines, have integrated themselves into our daily lives. These systems also serve as components of dialogue, question-answering, and recommender systems. The trajectory of IR has evolved dynamically from its origins in term-based methods to its integration with advanced neural models. While the neural models excel at capturing complex contextual signals and semantic nuances, thereby reshaping the IR landscape, they still face challenges such as data scarcity, interpretability, and the generation of contextually plausible yet potentially inaccurate responses. This evolution requires a combination of both traditional methods (such as term-based sparse retrieval methods with rapid response) and modern neural architectures (such as language models with powerful language understanding capacity). Meanwhile, the emergence of large language models (LLMs), typified by ChatGPT and GPT-4, has revolutionized natural language processing due to their remarkable language understanding, generation, generalization, and reasoning abilities. Consequently, recent research has sought to leverage LLMs to improve IR systems. Given the rapid evolution of this research trajectory, it is necessary to consolidate existing methodologies and provide nuanced insights through a comprehensive overview. In this survey, we delve into the confluence of LLMs and IR systems, including crucial aspects such as query rewriters, retrievers, rerankers, and readers. Additionally, we explore promising directions, such as search agents, within this expanding field.
Read more9/5/2024