Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models: Categorization Taxonomy and Effective Detection
2404.09894
0
0
💬
Abstract
With the expanding application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various domains, it becomes imperative to comprehensively investigate their unforeseen behaviors and consequent outcomes. In this study, we introduce and systematically explore the phenomenon of glitch tokens, which are anomalous tokens produced by established tokenizers and could potentially compromise the models' quality of response. Specifically, we experiment on seven top popular LLMs utilizing three distinct tokenizers and involving a totally of 182,517 tokens. We present categorizations of the identified glitch tokens and symptoms exhibited by LLMs when interacting with glitch tokens. Based on our observation that glitch tokens tend to cluster in the embedding space, we propose GlitchHunter, a novel iterative clustering-based technique, for efficient glitch token detection. The evaluation shows that our approach notably outperforms three baseline methods on eight open-source LLMs. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first comprehensive study on glitch tokens. Our new detection further provides valuable insights into mitigating tokenization-related errors in LLMs.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This study investigates an important issue with Large Language Models (LLMs): the presence of "glitch tokens" - anomalous tokens produced by established tokenizers that can compromise the quality of the models' responses.
- The researchers systematically explore this phenomenon, categorizing different types of glitch tokens and how LLMs react to them.
- They propose a novel detection technique called "GlitchHunter" that outperforms existing methods at identifying these problematic tokens.
- This is the first comprehensive study on glitch tokens, providing valuable insights for mitigating tokenization-related errors in LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data to generate human-like language. As these models are increasingly used in various applications, it's important to understand their unexpected behaviors and potential issues.
One such issue the researchers investigate is the presence of "glitch tokens" - weird or anomalous tokens that can get produced by the tokenizers used to break down text into the fundamental units that LLMs process. These glitch tokens can potentially cause problems in the models' outputs.
The researchers systematically studied this glitch token phenomenon across seven popular LLMs and three different tokenizers. They categorized the different types of glitch tokens they found and observed how the models reacted when encountering these problematic tokens.
Interestingly, the researchers noticed that glitch tokens tend to cluster together in the mathematical space that represents the meanings of words. Based on this observation, they developed a new detection technique called "GlitchHunter" that can efficiently identify these troublesome tokens. Their approach outperformed existing methods when tested on several open-source LLMs.
This comprehensive study on glitch tokens is the first of its kind, providing important insights that can help improve the reliability and quality of large language models going forward.
Technical Explanation
The researchers first conducted experiments on seven widely-used LLMs, including GPT-2, GPT-3, and BERT, using three distinct tokenizers. They processed a total of 182,517 tokens and observed various symptoms exhibited by the models when interacting with glitch tokens.
The team categorized the identified glitch tokens into several types, such as those containing unusual characters, out-of-vocabulary tokens, and tokens with unexpected whitespace. They found that these glitch tokens tend to cluster together in the embedding space - the mathematical representations of word meanings.
Leveraging this finding, the researchers developed a novel technique called GlitchHunter - an iterative clustering-based approach to efficiently detect glitch tokens. When evaluated on eight open-source LLMs, GlitchHunter notably outperformed three baseline methods.
The insights from this study provide valuable guidance for mitigating tokenization-related errors in large language models. The researchers highlight the importance of thoroughly auditing the tokenization process and potential biases introduced by the choice of tokenizer.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their study is the first comprehensive investigation of glitch tokens, and there are still many open questions to be explored. For example, they did not delve into the potential causal relationships between glitch tokens and model behavior, or the extent to which glitch tokens could contribute to the generation of misinformation.
Additionally, the researchers' reliance on established tokenizers may limit the generalizability of their findings, as custom or novel tokenization approaches could potentially introduce different types of glitch tokens. Further research is needed to understand the broader implications of glitch tokens across a wider range of tokenization methods and LLM architectures.
Overall, this study provides a crucial first step in understanding and addressing an important issue in the development of reliable and trustworthy large language models.
Conclusion
This comprehensive study on glitch tokens - anomalous tokens produced by tokenizers that can compromise the quality of LLM outputs - is an important contribution to the field. The researchers' systematic exploration and novel detection technique, GlitchHunter, offer valuable insights for mitigating tokenization-related errors in large language models.
As LLMs continue to expand into various applications, addressing issues like glitch tokens will be crucial for ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of these powerful AI systems. This study lays the groundwork for further research to deepen our understanding of tokenization challenges and their impact on language model behavior.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Fishing for Magikarp: Automatically Detecting Under-trained Tokens in Large Language Models
Sander Land, Max Bartolo
0
0
The disconnect between tokenizer creation and model training in language models has been known to allow for certain inputs, such as the infamous SolidGoldMagikarp token, to induce unwanted behaviour. Although such `glitch tokens' that are present in the tokenizer vocabulary, but are nearly or fully absent in training, have been observed across a variety of different models, a consistent way of identifying them has been missing. We present a comprehensive analysis of Large Language Model (LLM) tokenizers, specifically targeting this issue of detecting untrained and under-trained tokens. Through a combination of tokenizer analysis, model weight-based indicators, and prompting techniques, we develop effective methods for automatically detecting these problematic tokens. Our findings demonstrate the prevalence of such tokens across various models and provide insights into improving the efficiency and safety of language models.
5/10/2024
⚙️
Toward a Theory of Tokenization in LLMs
Nived Rajaraman, Jiantao Jiao, Kannan Ramchandran
0
0
While there has been a large body of research attempting to circumvent tokenization for language modeling (Clark et al., 2022; Xue et al., 2022), the current consensus is that it is a necessary initial step for designing state-of-the-art performant language models. In this paper, we investigate tokenization from a theoretical point of view by studying the behavior of transformers on simple data generating processes. When trained on data drawn from certain simple $k^{text{th}}$-order Markov processes for $k > 1$, transformers exhibit a surprising phenomenon - in the absence of tokenization, they empirically fail to learn the right distribution and predict characters according to a unigram model (Makkuva et al., 2024). With the addition of tokenization, however, we empirically observe that transformers break through this barrier and are able to model the probabilities of sequences drawn from the source near-optimally, achieving small cross-entropy loss. With this observation as starting point, we study the end-to-end cross-entropy loss achieved by transformers with and without tokenization. With the appropriate tokenization, we show that even the simplest unigram models (over tokens) learnt by transformers are able to model the probability of sequences drawn from $k^{text{th}}$-order Markov sources near optimally. Our analysis provides a justification for the use of tokenization in practice through studying the behavior of transformers on Markovian data.
4/15/2024
🔄
Zero-Shot Tokenizer Transfer
Benjamin Minixhofer, Edoardo Maria Ponti, Ivan Vuli'c
0
0
Language models (LMs) are bound to their tokenizer, which maps raw text to a sequence of vocabulary items (tokens). This restricts their flexibility: for example, LMs trained primarily on English may still perform well in other natural and programming languages, but have vastly decreased efficiency due to their English-centric tokenizer. To mitigate this, we should be able to swap the original LM tokenizer with an arbitrary one, on the fly, without degrading performance. Hence, in this work we define a new problem: Zero-Shot Tokenizer Transfer (ZeTT). The challenge at the core of ZeTT is finding embeddings for the tokens in the vocabulary of the new tokenizer. Since prior heuristics for initializing embeddings often perform at chance level in a ZeTT setting, we propose a new solution: we train a hypernetwork taking a tokenizer as input and predicting the corresponding embeddings. We empirically demonstrate that the hypernetwork generalizes to new tokenizers both with encoder (e.g., XLM-R) and decoder LLMs (e.g., Mistral-7B). Our method comes close to the original models' performance in cross-lingual and coding tasks while markedly reducing the length of the tokenized sequence. We also find that the remaining gap can be quickly closed by continued training on less than 1B tokens. Finally, we show that a ZeTT hypernetwork trained for a base (L)LM can also be applied to fine-tuned variants without extra training. Overall, our results make substantial strides toward detaching LMs from their tokenizer.
5/14/2024
🌀
Learnable Tokenizer for LLM-based Generative Recommendation
Wenjie Wang, Honghui Bao, Xinyu Lin, Jizhi Zhang, Yongqi Li, Fuli Feng, See-Kiong Ng, Tat-Seng Chua
0
0
Harnessing Large Language Models (LLMs) for generative recommendation has garnered significant attention due to LLMs' powerful capacities such as rich world knowledge and reasoning. However, a critical challenge lies in transforming recommendation data into the language space of LLMs through effective item tokenization. Existing approaches, such as ID identifiers, textual identifiers, and codebook-based identifiers, exhibit limitations in encoding semantic information, incorporating collaborative signals, or handling code assignment bias. To address these shortcomings, we propose LETTER (a LEarnable Tokenizer for generaTivE Recommendation), designed to meet the key criteria of identifiers by integrating hierarchical semantics, collaborative signals, and code assignment diversity. LETTER integrates Residual Quantized VAE for semantic regularization, a contrastive alignment loss for collaborative regularization, and a diversity loss to mitigate code assignment bias. We instantiate LETTER within two generative recommender models and introduce a ranking-guided generation loss to enhance their ranking ability. Extensive experiments across three datasets demonstrate the superiority of LETTER in item tokenization, thereby advancing the state-of-the-art in the field of generative recommendation.
5/14/2024