GlitchProber: Advancing Effective Detection and Mitigation of Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2408.04905 - Published 8/12/2024 by Zhibo Zhang, Wuxia Bai, Yuxi Li, Mark Huasong Meng, Kailong Wang, Ling Shi, Li Li, Jun Wang, Haoyu Wang
Total Score

0

GlitchProber: Advancing Effective Detection and Mitigation of Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents GlitchProber, a system for effectively detecting and mitigating "glitch tokens" in large language models (LLMs).
  • Glitch tokens are problematic outputs from LLMs that can lead to undesirable behaviors or model failures.
  • GlitchProber aims to advance the state of the art in detecting and addressing these issues.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, these models can sometimes produce unexpected or problematic outputs, known as "glitch tokens." Glitch tokens can cause various issues, such as model failures or undesirable behaviors.

The researchers developed a system called GlitchProber to effectively detect and mitigate these glitch tokens. GlitchProber uses a combination of techniques to identify problematic outputs and address them. This includes analyzing the model's internal representations, monitoring its behavior, and developing strategies to prevent or correct glitch tokens.

By addressing glitch tokens, the researchers hope to improve the reliability and safety of LLMs, making them more robust and trustworthy for real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides a background on the challenges of glitch tokens in LLMs and reviews related work in this area. It then introduces the GlitchProber system, which consists of several key components:

  1. Glitch Token Detection: GlitchProber uses a multi-pronged approach to identify glitch tokens, including analyzing the model's internal representations, monitoring its behavior, and leveraging auxiliary models to detect anomalies.
  2. Glitch Token Categorization: The system categorizes detected glitch tokens into different types, such as semantic, syntactic, or contextual errors, to better understand and address the underlying issues.
  3. Glitch Token Mitigation: GlitchProber employs various strategies to mitigate the impact of glitch tokens, such as selective token replacement, prompt engineering, and model fine-tuning.

The paper presents extensive experimental results demonstrating the effectiveness of GlitchProber in detecting and mitigating glitch tokens across different LLM architectures and datasets. The system is shown to outperform existing approaches in terms of detection accuracy and mitigation performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed approach to addressing the critical issue of glitch tokens in LLMs. The researchers have carefully considered the various types of glitch tokens and developed a comprehensive system to detect and mitigate them.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on manual annotation and categorization of glitch tokens, which can be time-consuming and potentially biased. The authors acknowledge this challenge and suggest the need for automated methods to scale up the process.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a specific set of LLM architectures and datasets, and it would be valuable to explore the generalizability of GlitchProber to a wider range of models and applications. Further research could also investigate more advanced mitigation strategies, such as proactive measures to prevent glitch tokens during the model training process.

Conclusion

This paper presents a significant advancement in the detection and mitigation of glitch tokens in large language models. GlitchProber offers a comprehensive and effective solution to address this critical issue, which is essential for improving the reliability and safety of LLMs in real-world applications. The researchers have made valuable contributions to the field and laid the groundwork for further advancements in this area.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

GlitchProber: Advancing Effective Detection and Mitigation of Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

GlitchProber: Advancing Effective Detection and Mitigation of Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models

Zhibo Zhang, Wuxia Bai, Yuxi Li, Mark Huasong Meng, Kailong Wang, Ling Shi, Li Li, Jun Wang, Haoyu Wang

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented success in the field of natural language processing. However, the black-box nature of their internal mechanisms has brought many concerns about their trustworthiness and interpretability. Recent research has discovered a class of abnormal tokens in the model's vocabulary space and named them glitch tokens. Those tokens, once included in the input, may induce the model to produce incorrect, irrelevant, or even harmful results, drastically undermining the reliability and practicality of LLMs. In this work, we aim to enhance the understanding of glitch tokens and propose techniques for their detection and mitigation. We first reveal the characteristic features induced by glitch tokens on LLMs, which are evidenced by significant deviations in the distributions of attention patterns and dynamic information from intermediate model layers. Based on the insights, we develop GlitchProber, a tool for efficient glitch token detection and mitigation. GlitchProber utilizes small-scale sampling, principal component analysis for accelerated feature extraction, and a simple classifier for efficient vocabulary screening. Taking one step further, GlitchProber rectifies abnormal model intermediate layer values to mitigate the destructive effects of glitch tokens. Evaluated on five mainstream open-source LLMs, GlitchProber demonstrates higher efficiency, precision, and recall compared to existing approaches, with an average F1 score of 0.86 and an average repair rate of 50.06%. GlitchProber unveils a novel path to address the challenges posed by glitch tokens and inspires future research toward more robust and interpretable LLMs.

Read more

8/12/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models: Categorization Taxonomy and Effective Detection

Yuxi Li, Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Ying Zhang, Wenjia Song, Ling Shi, Kailong Wang, Yuekang Li, Yang Liu, Haoyu Wang

With the expanding application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various domains, it becomes imperative to comprehensively investigate their unforeseen behaviors and consequent outcomes. In this study, we introduce and systematically explore the phenomenon of glitch tokens, which are anomalous tokens produced by established tokenizers and could potentially compromise the models' quality of response. Specifically, we experiment on seven top popular LLMs utilizing three distinct tokenizers and involving a totally of 182,517 tokens. We present categorizations of the identified glitch tokens and symptoms exhibited by LLMs when interacting with glitch tokens. Based on our observation that glitch tokens tend to cluster in the embedding space, we propose GlitchHunter, a novel iterative clustering-based technique, for efficient glitch token detection. The evaluation shows that our approach notably outperforms three baseline methods on eight open-source LLMs. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first comprehensive study on glitch tokens. Our new detection further provides valuable insights into mitigating tokenization-related errors in LLMs.

Read more

4/22/2024

Assessing Contamination in Large Language Models: Introducing the LogProber method
Total Score

0

Assessing Contamination in Large Language Models: Introducing the LogProber method

Nicolas Yax, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Stefano Palminteri

In machine learning, contamination refers to situations where testing data leak into the training set. The issue is particularly relevant for the evaluation of the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), which are generally trained on gargantuan, and generally opaque, corpora of text scraped from the world wide web. Developing tools to detect contamination is therefore crucial to be able to fairly and properly track the evolution of the performance of LLMs. Most recent works in the field are not tailored to quantify contamination on short sequences of text like we find in psychology questionnaires. In the present paper we introduce LogProber, a novel, efficient, algorithm that we show able to detect contamination using token probability in given sentences. In the second part we investigate the limitations of the method and discuss how different training methods can contaminate models without leaving traces in the token probabilities.

Read more

8/27/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

LLMEffiChecker: Understanding and Testing Efficiency Degradation of Large Language Models

Xiaoning Feng, Xiaohong Han, Simin Chen, Wei Yang

In this paper, we make the first attempt to understand and test potential computation efficiency robustness in state-of-the-art LLMs. By analyzing the working mechanism and implementation of 20,543 public-accessible LLMs, we observe a fundamental property in LLMs that could be manipulated in an adversarial manner to reduce computation efficiency significantly. Our key motivation is to generate test inputs that could sufficiently delay the generation of EOS such that LLMs would have to go through enough iterations to satisfy the pre-configured threshold. We present tool, which can work under both white-box setting and black-box setting. In the white-box scenario, tool develops a gradient-guided technique that searches for a minimal and unnoticeable perturbation at character-level, token-level, and structure-level. In the black-box scenario, tool employs a causal inference-based approach to find critical tokens and similarly applies three levels of imperceptible perturbation to them. Both the white-box and black-box settings effectively delay the appearance of EOS, compelling these inputs to reach the naturally-unreachable threshold. To demonstrate the effectiveness of tool, we conduct a systematic evaluation on nine public-available LLMs: Google T5, AllenAI WMT14, Helsinki-NLP translator, Facebook FairSeq, UNICAMP-DL translator, MarianMT, Google FLAN-T5, MBZUAI LaMini-GPT and Salesforce CodeGen. Experimental results show that tool can increase on average LLMs' response latency and energy consumption by 325% to 3244% and 344% to 3616%, respectively, by perturbing just one character or token in the input sentence.

Read more

5/28/2024