Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations
2310.06387
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success in various tasks, yet their safety and the risk of generating harmful content remain pressing concerns. In this paper, we delve into the potential of In-Context Learning (ICL) to modulate the alignment of LLMs. Specifically, we propose the In-Context Attack (ICA) which employs harmful demonstrations to subvert LLMs, and the In-Context Defense (ICD) which bolsters model resilience through examples that demonstrate refusal to produce harmful responses. We offer theoretical insights to elucidate how a limited set of in-context demonstrations can pivotally influence the safety alignment of LLMs. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the efficacy of ICA and ICD in respectively elevating and mitigating the success rates of jailbreaking prompts. Our findings illuminate the profound influence of ICL on LLM behavior, opening new avenues for improving the safety of LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores techniques for "jailbreaking" and aligning large language models (LLMs) with desired behaviors using only a few in-context demonstrations.
- The researchers propose methods to make LLMs more robust to adversarial attacks and better aligned with user intent, while requiring minimal training data.
- Key ideas include using intention analysis to understand user goals, and context learning to adapt LLM behavior.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, these models can sometimes behave in undesirable ways, such as producing biased or unsafe outputs. Researchers in this paper explore ways to "jailbreak" these models - to make them more aligned with what users want, while requiring only a few example interactions to train them.
The key ideas are:
- Intention analysis: Examining the user's intended goals and desired behaviors, rather than just the surface-level text. This helps the model better understand the user's true intent.
- Context learning: Adapting the model's behavior based on the specific context of the interaction, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach. This allows the model to be more flexible and responsive to the user's needs.
By combining these techniques, the researchers show they can make LLMs more robust to adversarial attacks (where someone tries to trick the model into behaving badly) and better aligned with the user's intentions - all while requiring only a few example interactions to train the model. This could lead to more trustworthy and reliable AI assistants in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes two key techniques for jailbreaking and aligning LLMs:
-
Intention Analysis: The researchers develop methods to analyze the user's intended goals and desired behaviors, beyond just the surface-level text. This allows the model to better understand the user's true intent, rather than just blindly following the input instructions. The intention analysis approach involves decomposing the language into different semantic components, such as format discrimination and label space, to more precisely model the user's underlying objectives.
-
Context Learning: The researchers also develop context learning techniques to adapt the LLM's behavior based on the specific context of the interaction. This allows the model to be more flexible and responsive to the user's needs, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach. The context learning approach involves learning to generalize the model's responses to novel situations, while also preserving privacy by avoiding overfitting to the specific users or prompts.
Through experiments, the researchers demonstrate that combining intention analysis and context learning allows them to "jailbreak" LLMs and make them more aligned with desired behaviors, even when only a few in-context demonstrations are provided. This approach shows promise for developing more trustworthy and reliable AI assistants that are robust to adversarial attacks and better tailored to user needs.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to making LLMs more aligned with user intent and robust to adversarial attacks. The intention analysis and context learning techniques are well-grounded in prior research and show promising results in the experiments.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations. The researchers note that their context learning approach, while generally effective, does not always generalize robustly to novel situations. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential for these techniques to be abused, such as by malicious actors trying to manipulate the models for their own ends.
Further research could investigate ways to make the jailbreaking and alignment process more transparent and accountable, perhaps by incorporating privacy-preserving prompt engineering techniques. There may also be opportunities to combine these ideas with other approaches, such as hint-enhanced context learning, to further improve the reliability and trustworthiness of LLMs.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to make AI systems more aligned with human values and less susceptible to misuse. The proposed techniques represent an important step forward, but continued research and development will be necessary to realize the full potential of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents novel techniques for "jailbreaking" and aligning large language models (LLMs) with desired behaviors, using only a few in-context demonstrations. The key ideas are intention analysis to better understand user goals, and context learning to adapt the model's behavior to specific situations.
By combining these approaches, the researchers demonstrate that LLMs can be made more robust to adversarial attacks and better aligned with user intent, without requiring large amounts of training data. This could lead to more trustworthy and reliable AI assistants in the future, capable of understanding and responding to user needs in more nuanced and contextualized ways.
While the paper identifies some limitations, the overall approach represents an important advancement in the effort to develop AI systems that are aligned with human values and less susceptible to misuse. Continued research in this area could yield further breakthroughs and help realize the full potential of large language models as powerful and beneficial tools for society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Hijacking Large Language Models via Adversarial In-Context Learning
Yao Qiang, Xiangyu Zhou, Dongxiao Zhu
0
0
In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm leveraging LLMs for specific downstream tasks by utilizing labeled examples as demonstrations (demos) in the precondition prompts. Despite its promising performance, ICL suffers from instability with the choice and arrangement of examples. Additionally, crafted adversarial attacks pose a notable threat to the robustness of ICL. However, existing attacks are either easy to detect, rely on external models, or lack specificity towards ICL. This work introduces a novel transferable attack against ICL to address these issues, aiming to hijack LLMs to generate the target response or jailbreak. Our hijacking attack leverages a gradient-based prompt search method to learn and append imperceptible adversarial suffixes to the in-context demos without directly contaminating the user queries. Comprehensive experimental results across different generation and jailbreaking tasks highlight the effectiveness of our hijacking attack, resulting in distracted attention towards adversarial tokens and consequently leading to unwanted target outputs. We also propose a defense strategy against hijacking attacks through the use of extra clean demos, which enhances the robustness of LLMs during ICL. Broadly, this work reveals the significant security vulnerabilities of LLMs and emphasizes the necessity for in-depth studies on their robustness.
6/18/2024
How Far Can In-Context Alignment Go? Exploring the State of In-Context Alignment
Heyan Huang, Yinghao Li, Huashan Sun, Yu Bai, Yang Gao
0
0
Recent studies have demonstrated that In-Context Learning (ICL), through the use of specific demonstrations, can align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences known as In-Context Alignment (ICA), indicating that models can comprehend human instructions without requiring parameter adjustments. However, the exploration of the mechanism and applicability of ICA remains limited. In this paper, we begin by dividing the context text used in ICA into three categories: format, system prompt, and example. Through ablation experiments, we investigate the effectiveness of each part in enabling ICA to function effectively. We then examine how variants in these parts impact the model's alignment performance. Our findings indicate that the example part is crucial for enhancing the model's alignment capabilities, with changes in examples significantly affecting alignment performance. We also conduct a comprehensive evaluation of ICA's zero-shot capabilities in various alignment tasks. The results indicate that compared to parameter fine-tuning methods, ICA demonstrates superior performance in knowledge-based tasks and tool-use tasks. However, it still exhibits certain limitations in areas such as multi-turn dialogues and instruction following.
6/18/2024
🤖
How Alignment and Jailbreak Work: Explain LLM Safety through Intermediate Hidden States
Zhenhong Zhou, Haiyang Yu, Xinghua Zhang, Rongwu Xu, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) rely on safety alignment to avoid responding to malicious user inputs. Unfortunately, jailbreak can circumvent safety guardrails, resulting in LLMs generating harmful content and raising concerns about LLM safety. Due to language models with intensive parameters often regarded as black boxes, the mechanisms of alignment and jailbreak are challenging to elucidate. In this paper, we employ weak classifiers to explain LLM safety through the intermediate hidden states. We first confirm that LLMs learn ethical concepts during pre-training rather than alignment and can identify malicious and normal inputs in the early layers. Alignment actually associates the early concepts with emotion guesses in the middle layers and then refines them to the specific reject tokens for safe generations. Jailbreak disturbs the transformation of early unethical classification into negative emotions. We conduct experiments on models from 7B to 70B across various model families to prove our conclusion. Overall, our paper indicates the intrinsical mechanism of LLM safety and how jailbreaks circumvent safety guardrails, offering a new perspective on LLM safety and reducing concerns. Our code is available at https://github.com/ydyjya/LLM-IHS-Explanation.
6/14/2024
🌿
A Survey on In-context Learning
Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, Zhifang Sui
0
0
With the increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs), in-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a new paradigm for natural language processing (NLP), where LLMs make predictions based on contexts augmented with a few examples. It has been a significant trend to explore ICL to evaluate and extrapolate the ability of LLMs. In this paper, we aim to survey and summarize the progress and challenges of ICL. We first present a formal definition of ICL and clarify its correlation to related studies. Then, we organize and discuss advanced techniques, including training strategies, prompt designing strategies, and related analysis. Additionally, we explore various ICL application scenarios, such as data engineering and knowledge updating. Finally, we address the challenges of ICL and suggest potential directions for further research. We hope that our work can encourage more research on uncovering how ICL works and improving ICL.
6/19/2024