Prompt Optimization via Adversarial In-Context Learning

2312.02614

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/26/2024 by Xuan Long Do, Yiran Zhao, Hannah Brown, Yuxi Xie, James Xu Zhao, Nancy F. Chen, Kenji Kawaguchi, Michael Shieh, Junxian He

🛠️

Abstract

We propose a new method, Adversarial In-Context Learning (adv-ICL), to optimize prompt for in-context learning (ICL) by employing one LLM as a generator, another as a discriminator, and a third as a prompt modifier. As in traditional adversarial learning, adv-ICL is implemented as a two-player game between the generator and discriminator, where the generator tries to generate realistic enough output to fool the discriminator. In each round, given an input prefixed by task instructions and several exemplars, the generator produces an output. The discriminator is then tasked with classifying the generator input-output pair as model-generated or real data. Based on the discriminator loss, the prompt modifier proposes possible edits to the generator and discriminator prompts, and the edits that most improve the adversarial loss are selected. We show that adv-ICL results in significant improvements over state-of-the-art prompt optimization techniques for both open and closed-source models on 11 generation and classification tasks including summarization, arithmetic reasoning, machine translation, data-to-text generation, and the MMLU and big-bench hard benchmarks. In addition, because our method uses pre-trained models and updates only prompts rather than model parameters, it is computationally efficient, easy to extend to any LLM and task, and effective in low-resource settings.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces a new method called Adversarial In-Context Learning (adv-ICL) to optimize prompts for in-context learning (ICL)
  • Uses three pre-trained language models: a generator, a discriminator, and a prompt modifier
  • Implemented as a two-player adversarial game between the generator and discriminator
  • Aims to generate realistic outputs that can fool the discriminator
  • Prompt modifier proposes edits to the generator and discriminator prompts based on the discriminator's loss
  • Shown to outperform state-of-the-art prompt optimization techniques on various tasks

Plain English Explanation

Adversarial In-Context Learning (adv-ICL) is a new method for improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) on different tasks. The key idea is to use three pre-trained models in an adversarial setup to optimize the prompts, which are the instructions and examples given to the LLM.

One of the models acts as a "generator," trying to produce output that looks realistic enough to fool another model, the "discriminator." The discriminator's job is to distinguish the generator's output from real data. Based on the discriminator's feedback, a third model, the "prompt modifier," proposes changes to the prompts used by the generator and discriminator.

This adversarial process iteratively refines the prompts, with the goal of finding prompts that allow the generator to produce output that the discriminator cannot reliably detect as being machine-generated. The authors show that this adversarial prompt optimization leads to significant improvements in performance on a wide range of tasks, including summarization, arithmetic reasoning, machine translation, and data-to-text generation.

The key advantage of this approach is that it only updates the prompts, rather than modifying the underlying language models themselves. This makes it computationally efficient and easy to apply to any LLM, even in low-resource settings.

Technical Explanation

The Adversarial In-Context Learning (adv-ICL) method uses three pre-trained language models: a generator, a discriminator, and a prompt modifier. The generator tries to produce output that can fool the discriminator, while the discriminator attempts to classify the generator's output as either model-generated or real data.

In each round of the adversarial training process, the generator is given an input prefixed with task instructions and exemplars, and it produces an output. The discriminator then tries to classify the generator's input-output pair as either real or model-generated. Based on the discriminator's loss, the prompt modifier proposes edits to the prompts used by both the generator and the discriminator.

The prompts that most improve the adversarial loss are selected, and the process repeats. This iterative adversarial prompt optimization leads to prompts that allow the generator to produce output that the discriminator cannot reliably detect as machine-generated.

The authors evaluate adv-ICL on a variety of tasks, including summarization, arithmetic reasoning, machine translation, and data-to-text generation, as well as on the MMLU and BigBench hard benchmarks. They show that adv-ICL outperforms state-of-the-art prompt optimization techniques for both open-source and closed-source language models.

Critical Analysis

The authors of the adv-ICL paper acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research. One key limitation is that the method relies on having access to pre-trained language models, which may not always be available, especially for specialized or low-resource tasks.

Additionally, the authors note that the prompt modification process can be computationally expensive, as it requires training the discriminator model and iterating on the prompt edits. While this is still more efficient than fine-tuning the underlying language models, it may not be practical for some real-world applications with strict computational constraints.

Another potential concern is the potential for adversarial attacks on retrieval-based context learning systems, which could undermine the benefits of the adv-ICL approach. The authors do not address this issue in the current paper, and it would be valuable for future research to explore the robustness of their method to such attacks.

Overall, the adv-ICL approach is a promising technique for optimizing language model performance through prompt engineering, but further research is needed to address its limitations and explore its broader applicability and robustness.

Conclusion

Adversarial In-Context Learning (adv-ICL) is a novel method for improving the performance of large language models on a variety of tasks. By using an adversarial setup with a generator, discriminator, and prompt modifier, the authors demonstrate significant improvements over state-of-the-art prompt optimization techniques.

The key advantages of adv-ICL are its computational efficiency, ease of use with any LLM, and effectiveness even in low-resource settings. While the method has some limitations, such as the need for pre-trained models and the potential for computational complexity, it represents an important step forward in the field of prompt engineering and in-context learning.

As language models continue to grow in capability and importance, techniques like adv-ICL will become increasingly valuable for unlocking their full potential and improving their robustness across a wide range of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

💬

Hijacking Large Language Models via Adversarial In-Context Learning

Yao Qiang, Xiangyu Zhou, Dongxiao Zhu

YC

0

Reddit

0

In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm leveraging LLMs for specific downstream tasks by utilizing labeled examples as demonstrations (demos) in the precondition prompts. Despite its promising performance, ICL suffers from instability with the choice and arrangement of examples. Additionally, crafted adversarial attacks pose a notable threat to the robustness of ICL. However, existing attacks are either easy to detect, rely on external models, or lack specificity towards ICL. This work introduces a novel transferable attack against ICL to address these issues, aiming to hijack LLMs to generate the target response or jailbreak. Our hijacking attack leverages a gradient-based prompt search method to learn and append imperceptible adversarial suffixes to the in-context demos without directly contaminating the user queries. Comprehensive experimental results across different generation and jailbreaking tasks highlight the effectiveness of our hijacking attack, resulting in distracted attention towards adversarial tokens and consequently leading to unwanted target outputs. We also propose a defense strategy against hijacking attacks through the use of extra clean demos, which enhances the robustness of LLMs during ICL. Broadly, this work reveals the significant security vulnerabilities of LLMs and emphasizes the necessity for in-depth studies on their robustness.

Read more

6/18/2024

🌿

Using Natural Language Explanations to Improve Robustness of In-context Learning

Xuanli He, Yuxiang Wu, Oana-Maria Camburu, Pasquale Minervini, Pontus Stenetorp

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent studies demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can excel in many tasks via in-context learning (ICL). However, recent works show that ICL-prompted models tend to produce inaccurate results when presented with adversarial inputs. In this work, we investigate whether augmenting ICL with natural language explanations (NLEs) improves the robustness of LLMs on adversarial datasets covering natural language inference and paraphrasing identification. We prompt LLMs with a small set of human-generated NLEs to produce further NLEs, yielding more accurate results than both a zero-shot-ICL setting and using only human-generated NLEs. Our results on five popular LLMs (GPT3.5-turbo, Llama2, Vicuna, Zephyr, and Mistral) show that our approach yields over 6% improvement over baseline approaches for eight adversarial datasets: HANS, ISCS, NaN, ST, PICD, PISP, ANLI, and PAWS. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that prompt selection strategies significantly enhance ICL on in-distribution test sets. However, our findings reveal that these strategies do not match the efficacy of our approach for robustness evaluations, resulting in an accuracy drop of 8% compared to the proposed approach.

Read more

5/21/2024

💬

Hint-enhanced In-Context Learning wakes Large Language Models up for knowledge-intensive tasks

Yifan Wang, Qingyan Guo, Xinzhe Ni, Chufan Shi, Lemao Liu, Haiyun Jiang, Yujiu Yang

YC

0

Reddit

0

In-context learning (ICL) ability has emerged with the increasing scale of large language models (LLMs), enabling them to learn input-label mappings from demonstrations and perform well on downstream tasks. However, under the standard ICL setting, LLMs may sometimes neglect query-related information in demonstrations, leading to incorrect predictions. To address this limitation, we propose a new paradigm called Hint-enhanced In-Context Learning (HICL) to explore the power of ICL in open-domain question answering, an important form in knowledge-intensive tasks. HICL leverages LLMs' reasoning ability to extract query-related knowledge from demonstrations, then concatenates the knowledge to prompt LLMs in a more explicit way. Furthermore, we track the source of this knowledge to identify specific examples, and introduce a Hint-related Example Retriever (HER) to select informative examples for enhanced demonstrations. We evaluate HICL with HER on 3 open-domain QA benchmarks, and observe average performance gains of 2.89 EM score and 2.52 F1 score on gpt-3.5-turbo, 7.62 EM score and 7.27 F1 score on LLaMA-2-Chat-7B compared with standard setting.

Read more

4/19/2024

🤔

AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs

Anselm Paulus, Arman Zharmagambetov, Chuan Guo, Brandon Amos, Yuandong Tian

YC

0

Reddit

0

While recently Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable successes, they are vulnerable to certain jailbreaking attacks that lead to generation of inappropriate or harmful content. Manual red-teaming requires finding adversarial prompts that cause such jailbreaking, e.g. by appending a suffix to a given instruction, which is inefficient and time-consuming. On the other hand, automatic adversarial prompt generation often leads to semantically meaningless attacks that can easily be detected by perplexity-based filters, may require gradient information from the TargetLLM, or do not scale well due to time-consuming discrete optimization processes over the token space. In this paper, we present a novel method that uses another LLM, called the AdvPrompter, to generate human-readable adversarial prompts in seconds, $sim800times$ faster than existing optimization-based approaches. We train the AdvPrompter using a novel algorithm that does not require access to the gradients of the TargetLLM. This process alternates between two steps: (1) generating high-quality target adversarial suffixes by optimizing the AdvPrompter predictions, and (2) low-rank fine-tuning of the AdvPrompter with the generated adversarial suffixes. The trained AdvPrompter generates suffixes that veil the input instruction without changing its meaning, such that the TargetLLM is lured to give a harmful response. Experimental results on popular open source TargetLLMs show state-of-the-art results on the AdvBench dataset, that also transfer to closed-source black-box LLM APIs. Further, we demonstrate that by fine-tuning on a synthetic dataset generated by AdvPrompter, LLMs can be made more robust against jailbreaking attacks while maintaining performance, i.e. high MMLU scores.

Read more

4/29/2024