How Susceptible are Large Language Models to Ideological Manipulation?
2402.11725
2
0
💬
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) possess the potential to exert substantial influence on public perceptions and interactions with information. This raises concerns about the societal impact that could arise if the ideologies within these models can be easily manipulated. In this work, we investigate how effectively LLMs can learn and generalize ideological biases from their instruction-tuning data. Our findings reveal a concerning vulnerability: exposure to only a small amount of ideologically driven samples significantly alters the ideology of LLMs. Notably, LLMs demonstrate a startling ability to absorb ideology from one topic and generalize it to even unrelated ones. The ease with which LLMs' ideologies can be skewed underscores the risks associated with intentionally poisoned training data by malicious actors or inadvertently introduced biases by data annotators. It also emphasizes the imperative for robust safeguards to mitigate the influence of ideological manipulations on LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to significantly influence public perceptions and interactions with information
- There are concerns about the societal impact if the ideologies within these models can be easily manipulated
- This research investigates how effectively LLMs can learn and generalize ideological biases from their training data
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. These models have the potential to shape how people perceive information and interact with it online. This raises concerns about the societal impact if the underlying ideologies or biases within these models can be easily manipulated.
The researchers in this study wanted to understand how well LLMs can pick up and spread ideological biases from their training data. They found that even a small amount of ideologically-driven samples can significantly alter the ideology of an LLM. Remarkably, these models can also generalize the ideology they learn about one topic to completely unrelated topics.
The ease with which an LLM's ideology can be skewed is concerning. This vulnerability could be exploited by bad actors who intentionally introduce biased data during training. It could also happen inadvertently if the data annotators who help train the models have their own biases. To address this risk, the researchers emphasize the need for robust safeguards to mitigate the influence of ideological manipulations on large language models.
Technical Explanation
The researchers investigated the ability of large language models (LLMs) to learn and generalize ideological biases from their instruction-tuning data. They found that exposure to even a small amount of ideologically-driven samples can significantly alter the ideology of an LLM. Notably, the models demonstrated a startling ability to absorb ideology from one topic and apply it to unrelated topics.
The researchers used a novel method to quantify the ideological biases present in the LLMs before and after exposure to ideologically-skewed data. Their findings reveal a concerning vulnerability in the ability of LLMs to be manipulated by malicious actors or inadvertent biases in the training data.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations to their work. They note that the study focused on a specific type of ideological bias, and further research is needed to understand how other types of biases may manifest in LLMs. Additionally, the experiments were conducted on a single LLM architecture, so the generalizability of the findings to other model types is unclear.
While the researchers' methods for quantifying ideological biases are novel, some aspects of their approach could be improved. For example, the reliance on human raters to assess the ideology of model outputs introduces potential subjectivity and inconsistencies.
Overall, the study highlights a significant concern about the vulnerability of large language models to ideological manipulation. However, further research is needed to fully understand the scope and implications of this issue, as well as develop effective mitigation strategies.
Conclusion
This research reveals a concerning vulnerability in large language models (LLMs) - they can easily absorb and generalize ideological biases from their training data. Even small amounts of ideologically-skewed samples can significantly alter the ideology of these powerful AI systems, which could have substantial societal impact if exploited by bad actors.
The ease with which an LLM's ideology can be manipulated underscores the urgent need for robust safeguards to mitigate the influence of ideological biases. As these models continue to grow in capability and influence, ensuring their integrity and neutrality will be crucial for maintaining public trust and protecting democratic discourse.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Large Language Models as Instruments of Power: New Regimes of Autonomous Manipulation and Control
Yaqub Chaudhary, Jonnie Penn
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) can reproduce a wide variety of rhetorical styles and generate text that expresses a broad spectrum of sentiments. This capacity, now available at low cost, makes them powerful tools for manipulation and control. In this paper, we consider a set of underestimated societal harms made possible by the rapid and largely unregulated adoption of LLMs. Rather than consider LLMs as isolated digital artefacts used to displace this or that area of work, we focus on the large-scale computational infrastructure upon which they are instrumentalised across domains. We begin with discussion on how LLMs may be used to both pollute and uniformize information environments and how these modalities may be leveraged as mechanisms of control. We then draw attention to several areas of emerging research, each of which compounds the capabilities of LLMs as instruments of power. These include (i) persuasion through the real-time design of choice architectures in conversational interfaces (e.g., via AI personas), (ii) the use of LLM-agents as computational models of human agents (e.g., silicon subjects), (iii) the use of LLM-agents as computational models of human agent populations (e.g., silicon societies) and finally, (iv) the combination of LLMs with reinforcement learning to produce controllable and steerable strategic dialogue models. We draw these strands together to discuss how these areas may be combined to build LLM-based systems that serve as powerful instruments of individual, social and political control via the simulation and disingenuous prediction of human behaviour, intent, and action.
5/8/2024
💬
Generative Language Models Exhibit Social Identity Biases
Tiancheng Hu, Yara Kyrychenko, Steve Rathje, Nigel Collier, Sander van der Linden, Jon Roozenbeek
0
0
The surge in popularity of large language models has given rise to concerns about biases that these models could learn from humans. We investigate whether ingroup solidarity and outgroup hostility, fundamental social identity biases known from social psychology, are present in 56 large language models. We find that almost all foundational language models and some instruction fine-tuned models exhibit clear ingroup-positive and outgroup-negative associations when prompted to complete sentences (e.g., We are...). Our findings suggest that modern language models exhibit fundamental social identity biases to a similar degree as humans, both in the lab and in real-world conversations with LLMs, and that curating training data and instruction fine-tuning can mitigate such biases. Our results have practical implications for creating less biased large-language models and further underscore the need for more research into user interactions with LLMs to prevent potential bias reinforcement in humans.
6/18/2024
💬
Large Language Models are Biased Because They Are Large Language Models
Philip Resnik
0
0
This paper's primary goal is to provoke thoughtful discussion about the relationship between bias and fundamental properties of large language models. We do this by seeking to convince the reader that harmful biases are an inevitable consequence arising from the design of any large language model as LLMs are currently formulated. To the extent that this is true, it suggests that the problem of harmful bias cannot be properly addressed without a serious reconsideration of AI driven by LLMs, going back to the foundational assumptions underlying their design.
6/21/2024
Evaluating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models by Attacking From a Psychometric Perspective
Yuchen Wen, Keping Bi, Wei Chen, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng
0
0
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become an important way of information seeking, there have been increasing concerns about the unethical content LLMs may generate. In this paper, we conduct a rigorous evaluation of LLMs' implicit bias towards certain groups by attacking them with carefully crafted instructions to elicit biased responses. Our attack methodology is inspired by psychometric principles in cognitive and social psychology. We propose three attack approaches, i.e., Disguise, Deception, and Teaching, based on which we built evaluation datasets for four common bias types. Each prompt attack has bilingual versions. Extensive evaluation of representative LLMs shows that 1) all three attack methods work effectively, especially the Deception attacks; 2) GLM-3 performs the best in defending our attacks, compared to GPT-3.5 and GPT-4; 3) LLMs could output content of other bias types when being taught with one type of bias. Our methodology provides a rigorous and effective way of evaluating LLMs' implicit bias and will benefit the assessments of LLMs' potential ethical risks.
6/21/2024