How to Train Your Fact Verifier: Knowledge Transfer with Multimodal Open Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.00369 - Published 7/2/2024 by Jaeyoung Lee, Ximing Lu, Jack Hessel, Faeze Brahman, Youngjae Yu, Yonatan Bisk, Yejin Choi, Saadia Gabriel
Total Score

0

How to Train Your Fact Verifier: Knowledge Transfer with Multimodal Open Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores how to train fact-checking models using knowledge transfer from large, multimodal language models.
  • The researchers propose a novel approach called "Knowledge Transfer with Multimodal Open Models" (KTMO) to leverage the rich knowledge and capabilities of these powerful models.
  • KTMO aims to improve the performance and robustness of fact-checking systems, which are crucial for combating the spread of misinformation and disinformation.

Plain English Explanation

Fact-checking is an important task for identifying false or misleading information, especially in the age of social media and the internet. However, building reliable fact-checking models can be challenging. This paper explores a new approach to train fact-checking models more effectively by using knowledge transfer from large, multimodal language models.

These large language models, such as GPT-3 and DALL-E, have been trained on vast amounts of data and have developed a deep understanding of the world. The researchers propose a method called "Knowledge Transfer with Multimodal Open Models" (KTMO) that allows fact-checking models to tap into this rich knowledge and learn more efficiently.

By transferring knowledge from these powerful language models, the fact-checking models can become more accurate and robust at identifying false claims. This is particularly important for combating the spread of misinformation and disinformation online, which can have serious consequences for individuals and society.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose a novel approach called "Knowledge Transfer with Multimodal Open Models" (KTMO) to improve the performance and robustness of fact-checking systems. KTMO leverages the rich knowledge and capabilities of large, multimodal language models, such as GPT-3 and DALL-E, to enhance the training of fact-checking models.

The key idea behind KTMO is to use the pretrained representations and knowledge from these powerful language models as a starting point for training the fact-checking model. This allows the fact-checking model to benefit from the extensive knowledge and understanding of the world that the language models have acquired during their pretraining on vast amounts of data.

The researchers have conducted experiments using the MFC-Bench dataset, which is a benchmark for evaluating multimodal fact-checking models. Their results show that KTMO can significantly improve the performance of fact-checking models compared to training from scratch or using other transfer learning techniques.

Furthermore, the researchers have found that KTMO can also help make the fact-checking models more robust to out-of-distribution or adversarial inputs, which is crucial for real-world applications where the models may encounter a wide range of challenging cases.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to improving fact-checking systems, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.

One key limitation is the reliance on the availability of large, pretrained multimodal language models, which may not be accessible to all researchers or organizations working on fact-checking. The researchers mention that further work is needed to explore the feasibility and scalability of their approach in more diverse settings.

Additionally, the paper does not fully address the issue of correcting misinformation that has already been widely disseminated. While the proposed KTMO approach can help identify false claims, more research is needed to understand how these models can be effectively deployed to mitigate the spread of misinformation on social media and other online platforms.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially impactful approach to enhancing fact-checking capabilities, but further research and real-world testing will be necessary to fully understand the limitations and practical implications of this technique.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach called "Knowledge Transfer with Multimodal Open Models" (KTMO) to improve the performance and robustness of fact-checking systems. By leveraging the rich knowledge and capabilities of large, multimodal language models, KTMO allows fact-checking models to learn more efficiently and become more accurate at identifying false claims.

The researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of KTMO through experiments on the MFC-Bench dataset, showing significant improvements over other approaches. This work has important implications for combating the spread of misinformation and disinformation online, which can have serious consequences for individuals and society.

While the paper presents a promising technique, it also highlights the need for further research to address the scalability and deployment challenges of such approaches in real-world settings. As the problem of misinformation continues to evolve, innovative solutions like KTMO will be crucial for maintaining the integrity of information and protecting the public from the harmful effects of false claims.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

How to Train Your Fact Verifier: Knowledge Transfer with Multimodal Open Models
Total Score

0

How to Train Your Fact Verifier: Knowledge Transfer with Multimodal Open Models

Jaeyoung Lee, Ximing Lu, Jack Hessel, Faeze Brahman, Youngjae Yu, Yonatan Bisk, Yejin Choi, Saadia Gabriel

Given the growing influx of misinformation across news and social media, there is a critical need for systems that can provide effective real-time verification of news claims. Large language or multimodal model based verification has been proposed to scale up online policing mechanisms for mitigating spread of false and harmful content. While these can potentially reduce burden on human fact-checkers, such efforts may be hampered by foundation model training data becoming outdated. In this work, we test the limits of improving foundation model performance without continual updating through an initial study of knowledge transfer using either existing intra- and inter- domain benchmarks or explanations generated from large language models (LLMs). We evaluate on 12 public benchmarks for fact-checking and misinformation detection as well as two other tasks relevant to content moderation -- toxicity and stance detection. Our results on two recent multi-modal fact-checking benchmarks, Mocheg and Fakeddit, indicate that knowledge transfer strategies can improve Fakeddit performance over the state-of-the-art by up to 1.7% and Mocheg performance by up to 2.9%.

Read more

7/2/2024

Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Real-World Fact-Checking
Total Score

0

Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Real-World Fact-Checking

Jiahui Geng, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Preslav Nakov, Iryna Gurevych

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) carry the potential to support humans in processing vast amounts of information. While MLLMs are already being used as a fact-checking tool, their abilities and limitations in this regard are understudied. Here is aim to bridge this gap. In particular, we propose a framework for systematically assessing the capacity of current multimodal models to facilitate real-world fact-checking. Our methodology is evidence-free, leveraging only these models' intrinsic knowledge and reasoning capabilities. By designing prompts that extract models' predictions, explanations, and confidence levels, we delve into research questions concerning model accuracy, robustness, and reasons for failure. We empirically find that (1) GPT-4V exhibits superior performance in identifying malicious and misleading multimodal claims, with the ability to explain the unreasonable aspects and underlying motives, and (2) existing open-source models exhibit strong biases and are highly sensitive to the prompt. Our study offers insights into combating false multimodal information and building secure, trustworthy multimodal models. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to evaluate MLLMs for real-world fact-checking.

Read more

4/29/2024

Multimodal Misinformation Detection using Large Vision-Language Models
Total Score

0

Multimodal Misinformation Detection using Large Vision-Language Models

Sahar Tahmasebi, Eric Muller-Budack, Ralph Ewerth

The increasing proliferation of misinformation and its alarming impact have motivated both industry and academia to develop approaches for misinformation detection and fact checking. Recent advances on large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various tasks, but whether and how LLMs could help with misinformation detection remains relatively underexplored. Most of existing state-of-the-art approaches either do not consider evidence and solely focus on claim related features or assume the evidence to be provided. Few approaches consider evidence retrieval as part of the misinformation detection but rely on fine-tuning models. In this paper, we investigate the potential of LLMs for misinformation detection in a zero-shot setting. We incorporate an evidence retrieval component into the process as it is crucial to gather pertinent information from various sources to detect the veracity of claims. To this end, we propose a novel re-ranking approach for multimodal evidence retrieval using both LLMs and large vision-language models (LVLM). The retrieved evidence samples (images and texts) serve as the input for an LVLM-based approach for multimodal fact verification (LVLM4FV). To enable a fair evaluation, we address the issue of incomplete ground truth for evidence samples in an existing evidence retrieval dataset by annotating a more complete set of evidence samples for both image and text retrieval. Our experimental results on two datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach in both evidence retrieval and fact verification tasks and also better generalization capability across dataset compared to the supervised baseline.

Read more

7/22/2024

MFC-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Fact-Checking with Large Vision-Language Models
Total Score

0

MFC-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Fact-Checking with Large Vision-Language Models

Shengkang Wang, Hongzhan Lin, Ziyang Luo, Zhen Ye, Guang Chen, Jing Ma

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have significantly improved multimodal reasoning tasks, such as visual question answering and image captioning. These models embed multimodal facts within their parameters, rather than relying on external knowledge bases to store factual information explicitly. However, the content discerned by LVLMs may deviate from actual facts due to inherent bias or incorrect inference. To address this issue, we introduce MFC-Bench, a rigorous and comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the factual accuracy of LVLMs across three tasks: Manipulation, Out-of-Context, and Veracity Classification. Through our evaluation on MFC-Bench, we benchmarked 12 diverse and representative LVLMs, uncovering that current models still fall short in multimodal fact-checking and demonstrate insensitivity to various forms of manipulated content. We hope that MFC-Bench could raise attention to the trustworthy artificial intelligence potentially assisted by LVLMs in the future. The MFC-Bench and accompanying resources are publicly accessible at https://github.com/wskbest/MFC-Bench, contributing to ongoing research in the multimodal fact-checking field.

Read more

6/18/2024