Human-AI Coevolution
0
🤿
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces the concept of "Coevolution AI" as a new field of study that examines the feedback loop between humans and AI systems, particularly recommender systems and assistants.
- It highlights the need to understand the complex and often "unintended" social outcomes that arise from this human-AI interaction.
- The paper outlines the pros and cons of existing methodologies, proposes a multidisciplinary approach, provides real-world examples, and discusses various challenges to establishing this new field of study.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the idea of "human-AI coevolution" - a process where humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other. This is a growing phenomenon in our society, but it hasn't been studied extensively in the fields of AI and complexity science.
Recommender systems and AI assistants play a big role in this human-AI coevolution. These systems are now a part of many aspects of our daily lives and shape the choices we make on online platforms. There's a feedback loop where our choices generate data that trains the AI models, which then influence our subsequent preferences.
This human-AI feedback loop is different from traditional human-machine interaction and can lead to complex and unexpected social outcomes. The paper introduces "Coevolution AI" as a new field of study that will focus on theoretically, empirically, and mathematically investigating this feedback loop.
The paper discusses the pros and cons of existing research methods, proposes a multidisciplinary approach that combines AI, complexity science, and societal considerations, and provides real-world examples of different human-AI ecosystems. It also highlights the various challenges to creating this new field of study, ranging from technical to epistemological, legal, and socio-political.
Technical Explanation
The paper outlines the concept of "human-AI coevolution," which refers to the process where humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other. This feedback loop is particularly evident in the case of recommender systems and AI assistants, which permeate many facets of daily life and shape user choices on online platforms.
The authors propose the "Coevolution AI" framework as a new field of study that will focus on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of this human-AI feedback loop. They highlight the need for this approach, as the interaction between users and AI systems can lead to complex and often "unintended" social outcomes, which are not well-captured by existing methodologies.
The paper examines the pros and cons of current research methods, such as agent-based modeling and learning analytics, and proposes a multidisciplinary approach that combines AI, complexity science, and societal considerations. The authors also provide real-world examples of different human-AI ecosystems, such as human-agent cooperation and AI-enabled decision-making.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the need to study the human-AI feedback loop and the emergence of "Coevolution AI" as a new field of inquiry. The authors rightly point out the limitations of existing methodologies in capturing the complex and often unintended social outcomes that arise from this interaction.
However, the paper could have delved deeper into the specific challenges and potential pitfalls of this new field of study. For example, it could have discussed the difficulties in modeling the dynamic and unpredictable nature of human-AI interactions, or the ethical and privacy concerns that may arise from the extensive data collection and algorithmic decision-making involved.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the potential barriers to the widespread adoption of the "Coevolution AI" approach, such as the siloed nature of academic disciplines or the resistance to change from established practices in the AI and complexity science communities.
Despite these minor limitations, the paper offers a valuable contribution to the growing understanding of the complex and interdependent relationship between humans and AI systems. By introducing the "Coevolution AI" framework, the authors have laid the groundwork for a much-needed interdisciplinary field of study that could yield important insights into the societal impacts of AI technologies.
Conclusion
The paper introduces the concept of "human-AI coevolution" and the "Coevolution AI" framework as a new field of study that examines the feedback loop between humans and AI systems, particularly recommender systems and assistants. It highlights the need to understand the complex and often "unintended" social outcomes that arise from this interaction, which are not well-captured by existing methodologies.
The paper outlines the pros and cons of current research approaches, proposes a multidisciplinary approach that combines AI, complexity science, and societal considerations, and provides real-world examples of different human-AI ecosystems. It also discusses the various challenges to establishing this new field of study, ranging from technical to epistemological, legal, and socio-political.
By introducing the "Coevolution AI" framework, the paper lays the foundation for a much-needed interdisciplinary field of study that could yield important insights into the societal impacts of AI technologies and guide the development of more responsible and inclusive AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
0
Human-AI Coevolution
Dino Pedreschi, Luca Pappalardo, Emanuele Ferragina, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, Frank Dignum, Virginia Dignum, Tina Eliassi-Rad, Fosca Giannotti, Janos Kertesz, Alistair Knott, Yannis Ioannidis, Paul Lukowicz, Andrea Passarella, Alex Sandy Pentland, John Shawe-Taylor, Alessandro Vespignani
Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices on online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often ``unintended'' social outcomes. This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: (i) outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; (ii) propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; (iii) provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and (iv) illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., technical, epistemological, legal and socio-political.
Read more5/6/2024
0
Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation
Steffen Holter, Mennatallah El-Assady
As full AI-based automation remains out of reach in most real-world applications, the focus has instead shifted to leveraging the strengths of both human and AI agents, creating effective collaborative systems. The rapid advances in this area have yielded increasingly more complex systems and frameworks, while the nuance of their characterization has gotten more vague. Similarly, the existing conceptual models no longer capture the elaborate processes of these systems nor describe the entire scope of their collaboration paradigms. In this paper, we propose a new unified set of dimensions through which to analyze and describe human-AI systems. Our conceptual model is centered around three high-level aspects - agency, interaction, and adaptation - and is developed through a multi-step process. Firstly, an initial design space is proposed by surveying the literature and consolidating existing definitions and conceptual frameworks. Secondly, this model is iteratively refined and validated by conducting semi-structured interviews with nine researchers in this field. Lastly, to illustrate the applicability of our design space, we utilize it to provide a structured description of selected human-AI systems.
Read more4/19/2024
0
Human-machine social systems
Milena Tsvetkova, Taha Yasseri, Niccolo Pescetelli, Tobias Werner
From fake social media accounts and generative-AI chatbots to financial trading algorithms and self-driving vehicles, robots, bots, and algorithms are proliferating and permeating our communication channels, social interactions, economic transactions, and transportation arteries. Networks of multiple interdependent and interacting humans and autonomous machines constitute complex social systems where the collective outcomes cannot be deduced from either human or machine behavior alone. Under this paradigm, we review recent research from across a range of disciplines and identify general dynamics and patterns in situations of competition, coordination, cooperation, contagion, and collective decision-making, with context-rich examples from high-frequency trading markets, a social media platform, an open-collaboration community, and a discussion forum. To ensure more robust and resilient human-machine communities, researchers should study them using complex-system methods, engineers should explicitly design AI for human-machine and machine-machine interactions, and regulators should govern the ecological diversity and social co-evolution of humans and machines.
Read more7/15/2024
0
AI-enhanced Collective Intelligence
Hao Cui, Taha Yasseri
The current societal challenges exceed the capacity of human individual or collective effort alone. As AI evolves, its role within human collectives is poised to vary from an assistive tool to a participatory member. Humans and AI possess complementary capabilities that, when synergized, can achieve a level of collective intelligence that surpasses the collective capabilities of either humans or AI in isolation. However, the interactions in human-AI systems are inherently complex, involving intricate processes and interdependencies. This narrative review incorporates perspectives from complex network science to conceptualize a multilayer representation of human-AI collective intelligence, comprising cognition, physical, and information layers. Within this multilayer network, humans and AI agents exhibit varying characteristics; humans differ in diversity from surface-level to deep-level attributes, while AI agents range in degrees of functionality and anthropomorphism. The interplay among these agents shapes the overall structure and dynamics of the system. We explore how agents' diversity and interactions influence the system's collective intelligence. Furthermore, we present an analysis of real-world instances of AI-enhanced collective intelligence. We conclude by addressing the potential challenges in AI-enhanced collective intelligence and offer perspectives on future developments in this field.
Read more8/14/2024