Impact Assessment of Missing Data in Model Predictions for Earth Observation Applications
2403.14297
0
0
Abstract
Earth observation (EO) applications involving complex and heterogeneous data sources are commonly approached with machine learning models. However, there is a common assumption that data sources will be persistently available. Different situations could affect the availability of EO sources, like noise, clouds, or satellite mission failures. In this work, we assess the impact of missing temporal and static EO sources in trained models across four datasets with classification and regression tasks. We compare the predictive quality of different methods and find that some are naturally more robust to missing data. The Ensemble strategy, in particular, achieves a prediction robustness up to 100%. We evidence that missing scenarios are significantly more challenging in regression than classification tasks. Finally, we find that the optical view is the most critical view when it is missing individually.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the impact of missing data on model predictions for Earth observation applications.
- It explores the challenges of multi-view learning, where models use multiple sources of data (e.g., satellite imagery, weather data) to make predictions.
- The researchers evaluate the performance of their models when faced with missing data from one or more data sources.
Plain English Explanation
When training artificial intelligence (AI) models to analyze Earth observation data, such as satellite imagery, the models often rely on multiple sources of information to make accurate predictions. This is known as multi-view learning. For example, an AI model might use both satellite images and weather data to predict crop yields.
However, in real-world scenarios, some of this data may be missing or unavailable. This could happen if a satellite malfunctions or if weather stations fail to collect data. The researchers in this paper wanted to understand how missing data from one or more sources would impact the accuracy of their AI model's predictions.
They designed experiments to simulate missing data and evaluated the performance of their models under these conditions. By understanding the effects of missing data, the researchers can help develop more robust and reliable AI systems for Earth observation applications, such as detecting out-of-distribution images or imputing missing cloud cover data.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used a multi-view learning approach, where their AI models incorporated data from multiple modalities (e.g., satellite imagery, weather data) to make predictions. They simulated missing data by randomly removing a portion of the data from one or more of these modalities during the training and evaluation of their models.
The researchers evaluated the performance of their models under different levels of missing data, ranging from 0% to 50% of the data being unavailable. They measured the impact on the models' ability to accurately predict the target variables, such as land cover classification or crop yield estimation.
Their results showed that the models were generally robust to moderate levels of missing data, but performance declined significantly when more than 30% of the data was missing. The researchers also found that the impact of missing data varied depending on the specific task and the relative importance of the missing modality to the model's predictions.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations in their study. First, they only simulated random patterns of missing data, whereas in real-world scenarios, missing data may be more structured or correlated with other variables. Additionally, the study was limited to a few specific Earth observation tasks, and the findings may not generalize to all possible applications.
It would be valuable for the researchers to explore more complex patterns of missing data, such as those that may arise from sensor failures or environmental conditions. Furthermore, investigating strategies for handling missing data, such as imputation or uncertainty-aware modeling, could provide additional insights and practical solutions for developing robust AI systems for Earth observation.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the impact of missing data on the performance of multi-view learning models for Earth observation applications. The researchers' findings highlight the importance of understanding and accounting for missing data when deploying AI systems in real-world scenarios, where data availability cannot be guaranteed.
By addressing the challenges of missing data, the research community can work towards building more reliable and trustworthy AI models for a wide range of Earth observation applications, from crop monitoring to disaster response.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Data Augmentation in Earth Observation: A Diffusion Model Approach
Tiago Sousa, Beno^it Ries, Nicolas Guelfi
0
0
The scarcity of high-quality Earth Observation (EO) imagery poses a significant challenge, despite its critical role in enabling precise analysis and informed decision-making across various sectors. This scarcity is primarily due to atmospheric conditions, seasonal variations, and limited geographical coverage, which complicates the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in EO. Data augmentation, a widely used technique in AI that involves generating additional data mainly through parameterized image transformations, has been employed to increase the volume and diversity of data. However, this method often falls short in generating sufficient diversity across key semantic axes, adversely affecting the accuracy of EO applications. To address this issue, we propose a novel four-stage approach aimed at improving the diversity of augmented data by integrating diffusion models. Our approach employs meta-prompts for instruction generation, harnesses general-purpose vision-language models for generating rich captions, fine-tunes an Earth Observation diffusion model, and iteratively augments data. We conducted extensive experiments using four different data augmentation techniques, and our approach consistently demonstrated improvements, outperforming the established augmentation methods, revealing its effectiveness in generating semantically rich and diverse EO images.
6/11/2024
Planetary Causal Inference: Implications for the Geography of Poverty
Kazuki Sakamoto, Connor T. Jerzak, Adel Daoud
0
0
Earth observation data such as satellite imagery can, when combined with machine learning, have profound impacts on our understanding of the geography of poverty through the prediction of living conditions, especially where government-derived economic indicators are either unavailable or potentially untrustworthy. Recent work has progressed in using EO data not only to predict spatial economic outcomes, but also to explore cause and effect, an understanding which is critical for downstream policy analysis. In this review, we first document the growth of interest in EO-ML analyses in the causal space. We then trace the relationship between spatial statistics and EO-ML methods before discussing the four ways in which EO data has been used in causal ML pipelines -- (1.) poverty outcome imputation for downstream causal analysis, (2.) EO image deconfounding, (3.) EO-based treatment effect heterogeneity, and (4.) EO-based transportability analysis. We conclude by providing a workflow for how researchers can incorporate EO data in causal ML analysis going forward.
6/6/2024
Impacts of Color and Texture Distortions on Earth Observation Data in Deep Learning
Martin Willbo, Aleksis Pirinen, John Martinsson, Edvin Listo Zec, Olof Mogren, Mikael Nilsson
0
0
Land cover classification and change detection are two important applications of remote sensing and Earth observation (EO) that have benefited greatly from the advances of deep learning. Convolutional and transformer-based U-net models are the state-of-the-art architectures for these tasks, and their performances have been boosted by an increased availability of large-scale annotated EO datasets. However, the influence of different visual characteristics of the input EO data on a model's predictions is not well understood. In this work we systematically examine model sensitivities with respect to several color- and texture-based distortions on the input EO data during inference, given models that have been trained without such distortions. We conduct experiments with multiple state-of-the-art segmentation networks for land cover classification and show that they are in general more sensitive to texture than to color distortions. Beyond revealing intriguing characteristics of widely used land cover classification models, our results can also be used to guide the development of more robust models within the EO domain.
4/15/2024
📊
Data Assimilation with Machine Learning Surrogate Models: A Case Study with FourCastNet
Melissa Adrian, Daniel Sanz-Alonso, Rebecca Willett
0
0
Modern data-driven surrogate models for weather forecasting provide accurate short-term predictions but inaccurate and nonphysical long-term forecasts. This paper investigates online weather prediction using machine learning surrogates supplemented with partial and noisy observations. We empirically demonstrate and theoretically justify that, despite the long-time instability of the surrogates and the sparsity of the observations, filtering estimates can remain accurate in the long-time horizon. As a case study, we integrate FourCastNet, a state-of-the-art weather surrogate model, within a variational data assimilation framework using partial, noisy ERA5 data. Our results show that filtering estimates remain accurate over a year-long assimilation window and provide effective initial conditions for forecasting tasks, including extreme event prediction.
5/24/2024