Implicit Bias of AdamW: $ell_infty$ Norm Constrained Optimization
2404.04454
0
0
Abstract
Adam with decoupled weight decay, also known as AdamW, is widely acclaimed for its superior performance in language modeling tasks, surpassing Adam with $ell_2$ regularization in terms of generalization and optimization. However, this advantage is not theoretically well-understood. One challenge here is that though intuitively Adam with $ell_2$ regularization optimizes the $ell_2$ regularized loss, it is not clear if AdamW optimizes a specific objective. In this work, we make progress toward understanding the benefit of AdamW by showing that it implicitly performs constrained optimization. More concretely, we show in the full-batch setting, if AdamW converges with any non-increasing learning rate schedule whose partial sum diverges, it must converge to a KKT point of the original loss under the constraint that the $ell_infty$ norm of the parameter is bounded by the inverse of the weight decay factor. This result is built on the observation that Adam can be viewed as a smoothed version of SignGD, which is the normalized steepest descent with respect to $ell_infty$ norm, and a surprising connection between normalized steepest descent with weight decay and Frank-Wolfe.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper investigates the implicit bias of the AdamW optimization algorithm, which is a variant of the popular Adam optimizer.
- It focuses on the ℓ_∞ norm constraint imposed by AdamW, and analyzes how this constraint affects the optimization process and the resulting models.
- The paper provides theoretical insights and empirical results that shed light on the behavior and properties of AdamW.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a popular optimization algorithm called AdamW, which is used to train machine learning models. AdamW is a variant of the well-known Adam optimizer, and it has a unique property where it imposes a constraint on the ℓ_∞ norm of the model's parameters.
The ℓ_∞ norm is a way of measuring the maximum absolute value of the model's parameters. The paper investigates how this ℓ_∞ norm constraint affects the optimization process and the final models that are trained using AdamW.
Through a combination of theoretical analysis and empirical experiments, the paper provides insights into the behavior and properties of AdamW. These insights can help researchers and practitioners understand the strengths, weaknesses, and potential biases of this optimization algorithm, which is widely used in the field of machine learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes the implicit bias of AdamW: ℓ_∞ norm constrained optimization. AdamW is a variant of the popular Adam optimizer, which incorporates an ℓ_∞ norm constraint on the model's parameters.
The authors provide a theoretical analysis of the optimization dynamics of AdamW, focusing on the ℓ_∞ norm constraint and its implications. They derive convergence guarantees for AdamW and show that the ℓ_∞ norm constraint can lead to a different optimization trajectory compared to the standard Adam algorithm.
The paper also includes empirical results that validate the theoretical findings. The authors conduct experiments on various machine learning tasks and datasets, comparing the performance and behavior of AdamW to other optimization algorithms, such as Conjugate Gradient-like Based Adaptive Moment Estimation and Faster Margin Maximization Rates for Generic Adversarially Robust Learning.
The experiments demonstrate how the ℓ_∞ norm constraint in AdamW can lead to different model characteristics, such as improved adversarial robustness or faster convergence in certain settings.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the AdamW optimizer and its ℓ_∞ norm constraint. The theoretical insights and empirical results offer valuable contributions to the understanding of this optimization algorithm and its properties.
One potential limitation of the research is that the analysis is focused on the ℓ_∞ norm constraint, and it does not explore the implications of other norm constraints that could be incorporated into the optimization process. It would be interesting to see if the insights gained from this study can be generalized to other types of norm constraints.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the practical implications of the ℓ_∞ norm constraint in real-world applications. Further research could investigate the impact of this constraint on the performance and behavior of machine learning models in specific domains or tasks.
Conclusion
The paper offers a detailed investigation of the implicit bias of the AdamW optimization algorithm, which is characterized by an ℓ_∞ norm constraint on the model's parameters. The theoretical analysis and empirical results provide valuable insights into the optimization dynamics and properties of AdamW, shedding light on its potential advantages and limitations compared to other optimization methods.
These findings can inform the selection and tuning of optimization algorithms in machine learning, as researchers and practitioners strive to develop more effective and robust models. The insights gained from this study can also motivate further research into the role of norm constraints in optimization and their impact on the characteristics of learned models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
On the Implicit Bias of Adam
Matias D. Cattaneo, Jason M. Klusowski, Boris Shigida
0
0
In previous literature, backward error analysis was used to find ordinary differential equations (ODEs) approximating the gradient descent trajectory. It was found that finite step sizes implicitly regularize solutions because terms appearing in the ODEs penalize the two-norm of the loss gradients. We prove that the existence of similar implicit regularization in RMSProp and Adam depends on their hyperparameters and the training stage, but with a different norm involved: the corresponding ODE terms either penalize the (perturbed) one-norm of the loss gradients or, conversely, impede its reduction (the latter case being typical). We also conduct numerical experiments and discuss how the proven facts can influence generalization.
6/18/2024
🏅
Provable Adaptivity of Adam under Non-uniform Smoothness
Bohan Wang, Yushun Zhang, Huishuai Zhang, Qi Meng, Ruoyu Sun, Zhi-Ming Ma, Tie-Yan Liu, Zhi-Quan Luo, Wei Chen
0
0
Adam is widely adopted in practical applications due to its fast convergence. However, its theoretical analysis is still far from satisfactory. Existing convergence analyses for Adam rely on the bounded smoothness assumption, referred to as the emph{L-smooth condition}. Unfortunately, this assumption does not hold for many deep learning tasks. Moreover, we believe that this assumption obscures the true benefit of Adam, as the algorithm can adapt its update magnitude according to local smoothness. This important feature of Adam becomes irrelevant when assuming globally bounded smoothness. This paper studies the convergence of randomly reshuffled Adam (RR Adam) with diminishing learning rate, which is the major version of Adam adopted in deep learning tasks. We present the first convergence analysis of RR Adam without the bounded smoothness assumption. We demonstrate that RR Adam can maintain its convergence properties when smoothness is linearly bounded by the gradient norm, referred to as the emph{$(L_0, L_1)$-smooth condition. We further compare Adam to SGD when both methods use diminishing learning rate. We refine the existing lower bound of SGD and show that SGD can be slower than Adam. To our knowledge, this is the first time that Adam and SGD are rigorously compared in the same setting and the advantage of Adam is revealed.
6/26/2024
The Implicit Bias of Adam on Separable Data
Chenyang Zhang, Difan Zou, Yuan Cao
0
0
Adam has become one of the most favored optimizers in deep learning problems. Despite its success in practice, numerous mysteries persist regarding its theoretical understanding. In this paper, we study the implicit bias of Adam in linear logistic regression. Specifically, we show that when the training data are linearly separable, Adam converges towards a linear classifier that achieves the maximum $ell_infty$-margin. Notably, for a general class of diminishing learning rates, this convergence occurs within polynomial time. Our result shed light on the difference between Adam and (stochastic) gradient descent from a theoretical perspective.
6/18/2024
🛠️
Convergence Guarantees for RMSProp and Adam in Generalized-smooth Non-convex Optimization with Affine Noise Variance
Qi Zhang, Yi Zhou, Shaofeng Zou
0
0
This paper provides the first tight convergence analyses for RMSProp and Adam in non-convex optimization under the most relaxed assumptions of coordinate-wise generalized smoothness and affine noise variance. We first analyze RMSProp, which is a special case of Adam with adaptive learning rates but without first-order momentum. Specifically, to solve the challenges due to dependence among adaptive update, unbounded gradient estimate and Lipschitz constant, we demonstrate that the first-order term in the descent lemma converges and its denominator is upper bounded by a function of gradient norm. Based on this result, we show that RMSProp with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. We then generalize our analysis to Adam, where the additional challenge is due to a mismatch between the gradient and first-order momentum. We develop a new upper bound on the first-order term in the descent lemma, which is also a function of the gradient norm. We show that Adam with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. Our complexity results for both RMSProp and Adam match with the complexity lower bound established in cite{arjevani2023lower}.
4/5/2024