Improved Membership Inference Attacks Against Language Classification Models

Read original: arXiv:2310.07219 - Published 7/19/2024 by Shlomit Shachor, Natalia Razinkov, Abigail Goldsteen
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are widely used in various industries, including retail, manufacturing, and healthcare.
  • As AI adoption increases, concerns about privacy risks have emerged, as the data used to train these models may contain personal information.
  • Assessing the privacy risks of machine learning models is crucial to make informed decisions about their use, deployment, and sharing.
  • One common approach to privacy risk assessment is to run known attacks against the model and measure their success rate.

Plain English Explanation

A research paper presents a novel framework for running membership inference attacks against classification models. Membership inference attacks aim to determine whether a specific data point was used to train a machine learning model.

The framework takes advantage of the ensemble method, which means it generates many specialized attack models for different subsets of the data. The researchers show that this approach achieves higher accuracy than either a single attack model or an attack model per class label, both on classical and language classification tasks.

This is important because it helps us better understand the privacy risks associated with machine learning models. By running these attacks, we can assess how much information about the training data is leaked by the model, which can inform decisions about whether to use, deploy, or share a particular model.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a novel framework for running membership inference attacks against classification models. Membership inference attacks are a type of privacy attack that aim to determine whether a specific data point was used to train a machine learning model.

The key innovation of the researchers' framework is the use of the ensemble method. Instead of a single attack model or an attack model per class label, the framework generates many specialized attack models, each targeting a different subset of the data. This approach allows the framework to better capture the nuances of the data and achieve higher attack accuracy.

The researchers evaluate their framework on both classical and language classification tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness across different types of models and datasets.

Critical Analysis

The research paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of privacy in machine learning. The authors have identified an important problem and proposed a novel solution that shows promising results.

However, it's important to note that the fundamental limits of membership inference attacks are still not fully understood. While the proposed framework achieves higher accuracy, there may be inherent limitations in the ability to infer membership from machine learning models, especially as models become more complex and opaque, such as large language models.

Additionally, the paper does not address the broader societal implications of these privacy attacks, such as how they could be misused or the ethical considerations around their development and deployment.

Conclusion

The research paper presents a novel framework for running membership inference attacks against classification models, which can help assess the privacy risks associated with machine learning models. By generating specialized attack models, the framework achieves higher accuracy than previous approaches, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the field of AI and machine learning.

As AI systems become more prevalent in our daily lives, understanding and mitigating privacy risks will be crucial to ensuring their responsible and ethical development and deployment.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

Improved Membership Inference Attacks Against Language Classification Models

Shlomit Shachor, Natalia Razinkov, Abigail Goldsteen

Artificial intelligence systems are prevalent in everyday life, with use cases in retail, manufacturing, health, and many other fields. With the rise in AI adoption, associated risks have been identified, including privacy risks to the people whose data was used to train models. Assessing the privacy risks of machine learning models is crucial to enabling knowledgeable decisions on whether to use, deploy, or share a model. A common approach to privacy risk assessment is to run one or more known attacks against the model and measure their success rate. We present a novel framework for running membership inference attacks against classification models. Our framework takes advantage of the ensemble method, generating many specialized attack models for different subsets of the data. We show that this approach achieves higher accuracy than either a single attack model or an attack model per class label, both on classical and language classification tasks.

Read more

7/19/2024

Membership Inference Attacks Against In-Context Learning
Total Score

0

Membership Inference Attacks Against In-Context Learning

Rui Wen, Zheng Li, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang

Adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to specific tasks introduces concerns about computational efficiency, prompting an exploration of efficient methods such as In-Context Learning (ICL). However, the vulnerability of ICL to privacy attacks under realistic assumptions remains largely unexplored. In this work, we present the first membership inference attack tailored for ICL, relying solely on generated texts without their associated probabilities. We propose four attack strategies tailored to various constrained scenarios and conduct extensive experiments on four popular large language models. Empirical results show that our attacks can accurately determine membership status in most cases, e.g., 95% accuracy advantage against LLaMA, indicating that the associated risks are much higher than those shown by existing probability-based attacks. Additionally, we propose a hybrid attack that synthesizes the strengths of the aforementioned strategies, achieving an accuracy advantage of over 95% in most cases. Furthermore, we investigate three potential defenses targeting data, instruction, and output. Results demonstrate combining defenses from orthogonal dimensions significantly reduces privacy leakage and offers enhanced privacy assurances.

Read more

9/4/2024

Confidence Is All You Need for MI Attacks
Total Score

0

Confidence Is All You Need for MI Attacks

Abhishek Sinha, Himanshi Tibrewal, Mansi Gupta, Nikhar Waghela, Shivank Garg

In this evolving era of machine learning security, membership inference attacks have emerged as a potent threat to the confidentiality of sensitive data. In this attack, adversaries aim to determine whether a particular point was used during the training of a target model. This paper proposes a new method to gauge a data point's membership in a model's training set. Instead of correlating loss with membership, as is traditionally done, we have leveraged the fact that training examples generally exhibit higher confidence values when classified into their actual class. During training, the model is essentially being 'fit' to the training data and might face particular difficulties in generalization to unseen data. This asymmetry leads to the model achieving higher confidence on the training data as it exploits the specific patterns and noise present in the training data. Our proposed approach leverages the confidence values generated by the machine learning model. These confidence values provide a probabilistic measure of the model's certainty in its predictions and can further be used to infer the membership of a given data point. Additionally, we also introduce another variant of our method that allows us to carry out this attack without knowing the ground truth(true class) of a given data point, thus offering an edge over existing label-dependent attack methods.

Read more

6/21/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

New!Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?

Michael Duan, Anshuman Suri, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Sewon Min, Weijia Shi, Luke Zettlemoyer, Yulia Tsvetkov, Yejin Choi, David Evans, Hannaneh Hajishirzi

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) attempt to predict whether a particular datapoint is a member of a target model's training data. Despite extensive research on traditional machine learning models, there has been limited work studying MIA on the pre-training data of large language models (LLMs). We perform a large-scale evaluation of MIAs over a suite of language models (LMs) trained on the Pile, ranging from 160M to 12B parameters. We find that MIAs barely outperform random guessing for most settings across varying LLM sizes and domains. Our further analyses reveal that this poor performance can be attributed to (1) the combination of a large dataset and few training iterations, and (2) an inherently fuzzy boundary between members and non-members. We identify specific settings where LLMs have been shown to be vulnerable to membership inference and show that the apparent success in such settings can be attributed to a distribution shift, such as when members and non-members are drawn from the seemingly identical domain but with different temporal ranges. We release our code and data as a unified benchmark package that includes all existing MIAs, supporting future work.

Read more

9/17/2024