Improving Context-Aware Preference Modeling for Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.14916 - Published 7/23/2024 by Silviu Pitis, Ziang Xiao, Nicolas Le Roux, Alessandro Sordoni

💬

Overview

Finetuning language models from pairwise preferences has been effective, but natural language's underspecified nature presents challenges.
Direct preference feedback can be uninterpretable, difficult to provide for multidimensional criteria, and inconsistent.
The researchers propose a two-step preference modeling procedure to address these challenges.

Plain English Explanation

Researchers have found that finetuning language models from pairwise preferences (where a human says they prefer one option over another) can be a very effective way to align these models with human preferences. However, the fact that natural language is often "underspecified" - meaning it can have multiple meanings or interpretations - creates some critical challenges.

For example, when a person gives direct preference feedback (says they prefer one option over another), it can be hard to fully understand what exactly they mean or what factors they are considering. Preferences can also be difficult to provide when there are multiple, complex criteria to weigh. And people's preferences are often inconsistent, either because the instructions weren't clear or because different people have different opinions.

To address these issues, the researchers propose a two-step process for modeling human preferences. First, they select a specific context or frame of reference. Then, they evaluate the preference within that chosen context. This allows them to resolve the ambiguity of natural language and better understand what factors are driving the preference.

The key is that the model's ability to accurately evaluate preferences in specific contexts is crucial for this approach to work. The researchers contribute new datasets to test this and find that existing preference models can benefit from considering context, but don't fully leverage it. They then finetune a new context-aware reward model that outperforms powerful language models on their context-specific preference tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a two-step preference modeling procedure to address the challenges posed by the underspecified nature of natural language in direct preference feedback. The first step is to select a context, resolving the ambiguity of the initial preference. The second step is to then evaluate the preference with respect to the chosen context.

The researchers decompose the overall reward modeling error into these two steps, suggesting that supervising both context selection and context-specific preference may be a viable approach to better align language models with diverse human preferences. To test this, they contribute new context-conditioned preference datasets and use them to:

Demonstrate that existing preference models can benefit from considering added context, but fail to fully leverage it.
Finetune a new context-aware reward model that outperforms powerful language models like GPT-4 and LLaMA 3 70B on the context-specific preference tasks.
Investigate the value and limitations of this context-aware preference modeling approach.

The key insight is that the ability of models to accurately evaluate preferences in specific contexts is critical for this two-step preference modeling procedure to be effective.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful approach to addressing the challenges posed by the underspecified nature of natural language in preference modeling. The two-step procedure of first selecting a context and then evaluating preference within that context seems like a reasonable way to resolve ambiguity and capture more nuanced preferences.

However, the reliance on this context-aware preference modeling does raise some potential concerns. The datasets and experiments conducted are limited, so it remains to be seen how well this approach would generalize to a wider range of preference elicitation scenarios. There may also be cases where the context selection itself is ambiguous or difficult for the model to determine.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or blindspots that could arise from this approach. By focusing the preference evaluation on specific contexts, the model may miss important considerations or fail to generalize well to new situations. Further research is needed to understand the limitations and edge cases of this context-aware preference modeling.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the challenges of underspecified natural language in preference modeling and proposing a promising, context-aware approach to address them. But additional work is needed to fully validate the effectiveness and robustness of this method.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the critical challenge of aligning language models with diverse human preferences, which is a key issue for building AI systems that reliably behave in accordance with human values. By proposing a two-step preference modeling procedure that first selects a context and then evaluates preference within that context, the researchers offer a thoughtful approach to resolving the ambiguity inherent in natural language.

The empirical results demonstrate the potential benefits of this context-aware preference modeling, with the new model outperforming powerful language models on context-specific preference tasks. However, the analysis also highlights the need for further research to fully understand the limitations and generalization capabilities of this approach.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of aligning language models with human preferences, pointing the way towards more nuanced and reliable preference elicitation and modeling techniques. As AI systems become increasingly powerful and influential, developing robust methods for imbuing them with human values will only grow in significance.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Improving Context-Aware Preference Modeling for Language Models

Silviu Pitis, Ziang Xiao, Nicolas Le Roux, Alessandro Sordoni

While finetuning language models from pairwise preferences has proven remarkably effective, the underspecified nature of natural language presents critical challenges. Direct preference feedback is uninterpretable, difficult to provide where multidimensional criteria may apply, and often inconsistent, either because it is based on incomplete instructions or provided by diverse principals. To address these challenges, we consider the two-step preference modeling procedure that first resolves the under-specification by selecting a context, and then evaluates preference with respect to the chosen context. We decompose reward modeling error according to these two steps, which suggests that supervising context in addition to context-specific preference may be a viable approach to aligning models with diverse human preferences. For this to work, the ability of models to evaluate context-specific preference is critical. To this end, we contribute context-conditioned preference datasets and accompanying experiments that investigate the ability of language models to evaluate context-specific preference. We use our datasets to (1) show that existing preference models benefit from, but fail to fully consider, added context, (2) finetune a context-aware reward model with context-specific performance exceeding that of GPT-4 and Llama 3 70B on tested datasets, and (3) investigate the value of context-aware preference modeling.

7/23/2024

Establishing Knowledge Preference in Language Models

Sizhe Zhou, Sha Li, Yu Meng, Yizhu Jiao, Heng Ji, Jiawei Han

Language models are known to encode a great amount of factual knowledge through pretraining. However, such knowledge might be insufficient to cater to user requests, requiring the model to integrate external knowledge sources and adhere to user-provided specifications. When answering questions about ongoing events, the model should use recent news articles to update its response; when asked to provide recommendations, the model should prioritize user specifications over retrieved product reviews; when some facts are edited in the model, the updated facts should override all prior knowledge learned by the model even if they are conflicting. In all of the cases above, the model faces a decision between its own parametric knowledge, (retrieved) contextual knowledge, and user instruction knowledge. In this paper, we (1) unify such settings into the problem of knowledge preference and define a three-level preference hierarchy over these knowledge sources; (2) compile a collection of existing datasets IfQA, MQuAKE, and MRQA covering a combination of settings (with/without user specifications, with/without context documents) to systematically evaluate how well models obey the intended knowledge preference; and (3) propose a dataset synthesis method that composes diverse question-answer pairs with user assumptions and related context to directly fine-tune LMs for instilling the hierarchy of knowledge. We demonstrate that a 7B model, fine-tuned on only a few thousand examples automatically generated by our proposed method, effectively achieves superior performance (more than 18% improvement across all evaluation benchmarks) in adhering to the desired knowledge preference hierarchy.

7/19/2024

A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Models

Ruili Jiang, Kehai Chen, Xuefeng Bai, Zhixuan He, Juntao Li, Muyun Yang, Tiejun Zhao, Liqiang Nie, Min Zhang

The recent surge of versatile large language models (LLMs) largely depends on aligning increasingly capable foundation models with human intentions by preference learning, enhancing LLMs with excellent applicability and effectiveness in a wide range of contexts. Despite the numerous related studies conducted, a perspective on how human preferences are introduced into LLMs remains limited, which may prevent a deeper comprehension of the relationships between human preferences and LLMs as well as the realization of their limitations. In this survey, we review the progress in exploring human preference learning for LLMs from a preference-centered perspective, covering the sources and formats of preference feedback, the modeling and usage of preference signals, as well as the evaluation of the aligned LLMs. We first categorize the human feedback according to data sources and formats. We then summarize techniques for human preferences modeling and compare the advantages and disadvantages of different schools of models. Moreover, we present various preference usage methods sorted by the objectives to utilize human preference signals. Finally, we summarize some prevailing approaches to evaluate LLMs in terms of alignment with human intentions and discuss our outlooks on the human intention alignment for LLMs.

6/19/2024

Conditional Language Learning with Context

Xiao Zhang, Miao Li, Ji Wu

Language models can learn sophisticated language understanding skills from fitting raw text. They also unselectively learn useless corpus statistics and biases, especially during finetuning on domain-specific corpora. In this paper, we propose a simple modification to causal language modeling called conditional finetuning, which performs language modeling conditioned on a context. We show that a context can explain away certain corpus statistics and make the model avoid learning them. In this fashion, conditional finetuning achieves selective learning from a corpus, learning knowledge useful for downstream tasks while avoiding learning useless corpus statistics like topic biases. This selective learning effect leads to less forgetting and better stability-plasticity tradeoff in domain finetuning, potentially benefitting lifelong learning with language models.

6/5/2024