Improving Execution Concurrency in Partial-Order Plans via Block-Substitution
2406.18615
0
0
Abstract
Partial-order plans in AI planning facilitate execution flexibility and several other tasks, such as plan reuse, modification, and decomposition, due to their less constrained nature. A Partial-Order Plan (POP) allows two actions with no ordering between them, thus providing the flexibility of executing actions in different sequences. This flexibility can be further extended by enabling parallel execution of actions in a POP to reduce its overall execution time. While extensive studies exist on improving the flexibility of a POP by optimizing its action orderings through plan deordering and reordering, there has been limited focus on the flexibility of executing actions concurrently in a plan. Execution concurrency in a POP can be achieved by incorporating action non-concurrency constraints, specifying which actions can not be executed in parallel. This work formalizes the conditions for non-concurrency constraints to transform a POP into a parallel plan. We also introduce an algorithm to enhance the plan's concurrency by optimizing resource utilization through substitutions of its subplans with respect to the corresponding planning task. Our algorithm employs block deordering that eliminates orderings in a POP by encapsulating coherent actions in blocks, and then exploits blocks as candidate subplans for substitutions. Experiments over the benchmark problems from International Planning Competitions (IPC) exhibit significant improvement in plan concurrency, specifically, with improvement in 25% of the plans, and an overall increase of 2.1% in concurrency.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new approach to improving the flexibility of plan execution using block substitution.
- The authors also introduce the concept of partially preserving orders and discuss its importance in optimal planning.
- The paper explores the application of interval logic satisfiability for temporal planning in autonomous systems.
- Additionally, the research covers prioritizing team actions in multi-agent temporal logic.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses several techniques to make planning and execution of tasks more flexible and effective. Improving Plan Execution Flexibility Using Block Substitution introduces a method called "block substitution" that allows for substituting parts of a plan with alternative actions while preserving the overall plan structure. This can be useful when the original plan cannot be fully executed as intended.
The paper also explores the idea of partially preserving orders in planning. Some ordering constraints between actions are more important than others, so the research looks at ways to identify and preserve the critical ordering relationships while relaxing less important ones. This can lead to more optimal plans.
Another technique covered is using interval logic satisfiability for temporal planning in autonomous systems. This allows the system to reason about time intervals and temporal relationships between actions, which is crucial for many real-world planning problems.
The final topic is prioritizing team actions in multi-agent temporal logic. When multiple agents need to coordinate their actions, it's important to be able to specify priorities and preferences to ensure the most important tasks are handled first.
Overall, these techniques aim to make planning and execution more flexible, efficient, and applicable to complex, real-world scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The paper first introduces the concept of improving plan execution flexibility using block substitution. The authors propose a method that allows for substituting parts of a plan (referred to as "blocks") with alternative actions while preserving the overall plan structure. This can be useful when the original plan cannot be fully executed as intended, due to changes in the environment or other factors.
Next, the paper discusses the importance of partially preserving orders in planning. The authors argue that some ordering constraints between actions are more critical than others, and they present techniques to identify and preserve the essential ordering relationships while relaxing less important ones. This can lead to more optimal plans that are still able to achieve the desired goals.
The paper also explores the use of interval logic satisfiability for temporal planning in autonomous systems. By reasoning about time intervals and temporal relationships between actions, the system can better handle the complexities of real-world planning problems.
Finally, the research covers the topic of prioritizing team actions in multi-agent temporal logic. When multiple agents need to coordinate their actions, it's important to be able to specify priorities and preferences to ensure the most important tasks are handled first. The paper presents techniques for modeling and reasoning about these priorities in a multi-agent setting.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of several advanced techniques for improving the flexibility and efficiency of planning and execution. The authors have clearly put a lot of thought into addressing the challenges associated with real-world planning problems, such as dynamic environments, partial information, and multi-agent coordination.
One potential limitation of the research is the lack of extensive evaluation on large-scale, real-world scenarios. While the authors present promising results in their experiments, it would be valuable to see how these techniques perform in more complex, realistic settings. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the computational complexity and scalability of the proposed methods, which could be an important consideration for practical applications.
Another area for further exploration is the interaction and integration of the different techniques presented in the paper. It would be interesting to see how the block substitution, partial order preservation, interval logic satisfiability, and multi-agent prioritization approaches could be combined to create a more robust and versatile planning framework.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents a valuable contribution to the field of planning and execution, and the ideas and techniques discussed could have significant implications for a wide range of autonomous and semi-autonomous systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces several advanced techniques for improving the flexibility and efficiency of planning and execution. The key ideas include:
- Improving Plan Execution Flexibility Using Block Substitution: A method for substituting parts of a plan with alternative actions while preserving the overall plan structure.
- Partially Preserving Orders: Identifying and preserving the essential ordering relationships between actions to achieve more optimal plans.
- Interval Logic Satisfiability for Temporal Planning: Using interval logic to reason about time intervals and temporal relationships in planning.
- Prioritizing Team Actions in Multi-Agent Temporal Logic: Modeling and reasoning about priorities and preferences in multi-agent planning scenarios.
These techniques have the potential to significantly improve the flexibility, efficiency, and applicability of planning and execution in a wide range of autonomous and semi-autonomous systems, from robotics and logistics to disaster response and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Improving Plan Execution Flexibility using Block-Substitution
Sabah Binte Noor, Fazlul Hasan Siddiqui
0
0
Partial-order plans in AI planning facilitate execution flexibility due to their less-constrained nature. Maximizing plan flexibility has been studied through the notions of plan deordering, and plan reordering. Plan deordering removes unnecessary action orderings within a plan, while plan reordering modifies them arbitrarily to minimize action orderings. This study, in contrast with traditional plan deordering and reordering strategies, improves a plan's flexibility by substituting its subplans with actions outside the plan for a planning problem. We exploit block deordering, which eliminates orderings in a POP by encapsulating coherent actions in blocks, to construct action blocks as candidate subplans for substitutions. In addition, this paper introduces a pruning technique for eliminating redundant actions within a BDPO plan. We also evaluate our approach when combined with MaxSAT-based reorderings. Our experimental result demonstrates a significant improvement in plan execution flexibility on the benchmark problems from International Planning Competitions (IPC), maintaining good coverage and execution time.
6/6/2024
Some Orders Are Important: Partially Preserving Orders in Top-Quality Planning
Michael Katz, Junkyu Lee, Jungkoo Kang, Shirin Sohrabi
0
0
The ability to generate multiple plans is central to using planning in real-life applications. Top-quality planners generate sets of such top-cost plans, allowing flexibility in determining equivalent ones. In terms of the order between actions in a plan, the literature only considers two extremes -- either all orders are important, making each plan unique, or all orders are unimportant, treating two plans differing only in the order of actions as equivalent. To allow flexibility in selecting important orders, we propose specifying a subset of actions the orders between which are important, interpolating between the top-quality and unordered top-quality planning problems. We explore the ways of adapting partial order reduction search pruning techniques to address this new computational problem and present experimental evaluations demonstrating the benefits of exploiting such techniques in this setting.
4/3/2024
📊
Optimal Planning for Timed Partial Order Specifications
Kandai Watanabe, Georgios Fainekos, Bardh Hoxha, Morteza Lahijanian, Hideki Okamoto, Sriram Sankaranarayanan
0
0
This paper addresses the challenge of planning a sequence of tasks to be performed by multiple robots while minimizing the overall completion time subject to timing and precedence constraints. Our approach uses the Timed Partial Orders (TPO) model to specify these constraints. We translate this problem into a Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) variant with timing and precedent constraints, and we solve it as a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) problem. Our contributions include a general planning framework for TPO specifications, a MILP formulation accommodating time windows and precedent constraints, its extension to multi-robot scenarios, and a method to quantify plan robustness. We demonstrate our framework on several case studies, including an aircraft turnaround task involving three Jackal robots, highlighting the approach's potential applicability to important real-world problems. Our benchmark results show that our MILP method outperforms state-of-the-art open-source TSP solvers OR-Tools.
5/3/2024
🚀
Temporal Planning via Interval Logic Satisfiability for Autonomous Systems
Miquel Ramirez, Anubhav Singh, Peter Stuckey, Chris Manzie
0
0
Many automated planning methods and formulations rely on suitably designed abstractions or simplifications of the constrained dynamics associated with agents to attain computational scalability. We consider formulations of temporal planning where intervals are associated with both action and fluent atoms, and relations between these are given as sentences in Allen's Interval Logic. We propose a notion of planning graphs that can account for complex concurrency relations between actions and fluents as a Constraint Programming (CP) model. We test an implementation of our algorithm on a state-of-the-art framework for CP and compare it with PDDL 2.1 planners that capture plans requiring complex concurrent interactions between agents. We demonstrate our algorithm outperforms existing PDDL 2.1 planners in the case studies. Still, scalability remains challenging when plans must comply with intricate concurrent interactions and the sequencing of actions.
6/17/2024