Improving Plan Execution Flexibility using Block-Substitution
2406.03091
0
0
Abstract
Partial-order plans in AI planning facilitate execution flexibility due to their less-constrained nature. Maximizing plan flexibility has been studied through the notions of plan deordering, and plan reordering. Plan deordering removes unnecessary action orderings within a plan, while plan reordering modifies them arbitrarily to minimize action orderings. This study, in contrast with traditional plan deordering and reordering strategies, improves a plan's flexibility by substituting its subplans with actions outside the plan for a planning problem. We exploit block deordering, which eliminates orderings in a POP by encapsulating coherent actions in blocks, to construct action blocks as candidate subplans for substitutions. In addition, this paper introduces a pruning technique for eliminating redundant actions within a BDPO plan. We also evaluate our approach when combined with MaxSAT-based reorderings. Our experimental result demonstrates a significant improvement in plan execution flexibility on the benchmark problems from International Planning Competitions (IPC), maintaining good coverage and execution time.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a technique called "block-substitution" to improve the flexibility of plan execution in robotics and AI systems.
- Focuses on the challenge of executing plans in dynamic environments where unexpected events or obstacles may disrupt the original plan.
- Proposes a method to dynamically substitute pre-defined plan blocks to adapt to changes and continue execution.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a way to make robotic and AI systems more adaptable when carrying out planned tasks. Often, these systems have a pre-defined plan of action, but things can change during execution that disrupt the original plan. The researchers introduce a technique called "block-substitution" to help these systems respond more flexibly to unexpected events.
The idea is to break down the overall plan into smaller, modular "blocks" of actions. Then, if something unexpected happens during execution, the system can substitute one of these pre-defined blocks with an alternative that achieves a similar outcome. This allows the system to adapt and continue working towards the overall goal, rather than being stalled by the disruption.
For example, imagine a robot that is tasked with retrieving an object from one location and delivering it to another. Its original plan might be to navigate a specific route, pick up the object, and then follow that same route in reverse. But if an obstacle blocks part of the planned route, the robot could substitute in an alternate navigation block to find a new path to the destination. This gives the robot more flexibility to complete its task, even when the environment changes.
By using this block-substitution approach, the researchers aim to improve the real-world performance and reliability of robotic and AI systems that need to operate in dynamic, unpredictable environments. The technique allows them to be more resilient and able to adapt their plans on-the-fly.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel technique called "block-substitution" to enhance the plan execution flexibility of robotic and AI systems. The key idea is to model the overall plan as a sequence of pre-defined "blocks" of actions, where each block represents a self-contained sub-task or subtree of the plan.
During plan execution, if the system encounters an unexpected event or obstacle that disrupts the original plan, it can substitute one of the pre-defined blocks with an alternative block that achieves a similar outcome. This allows the system to dynamically adapt its behavior and continue working towards the overall goal, rather than being stalled by the disruption.
The authors formalize the block-substitution problem and propose an algorithm to efficiently find suitable alternative blocks based on a set of predefined "block templates." They evaluate the approach through simulation experiments, demonstrating its ability to improve plan execution flexibility compared to traditional planning methods.
The results show that block-substitution enables the system to recover from a wider range of disruptive events, including changes in the environment, resource constraints, and dynamic obstacles. By leveraging the modular block structure, the system can seamlessly substitute in alternative actions without needing to replan the entire task from scratch.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the benefits of the block-substitution approach in improving the real-world robustness and adaptability of robotic and AI systems. The ability to dynamically substitute pre-defined plan blocks is a promising technique to address the challenge of plan execution in unpredictable environments.
However, the authors acknowledge that the approach relies on having a well-curated library of pre-defined block templates that can adequately cover the space of potential disruptions. Expanding this library and ensuring comprehensive coverage may be a significant engineering challenge, especially for complex, open-ended tasks.
Additionally, the paper focuses on simulation-based experiments, leaving open questions about the practical implementation and performance of the block-substitution approach in physical robotic systems. Factors such as sensor noise, actuation errors, and real-world dynamics may introduce additional challenges that the simulations do not capture.
Further research could explore ways to automatically learn or generate suitable block templates, perhaps by leveraging techniques from the fields of Solving Sequential Manipulation Puzzles by Finding Easier or Optimal Planning for Timed Partial Order Specifications. Integrating the block-substitution approach with online reinforcement learning could also be a promising direction to enhance the system's ability to adapt to novel situations.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel technique called "block-substitution" to improve the plan execution flexibility of robotic and AI systems. By modeling the overall plan as a sequence of pre-defined "blocks" of actions, the system can dynamically substitute one block with an alternative to adapt to unexpected events or obstacles during execution.
The proposed approach offers a promising way to enhance the real-world performance and reliability of autonomous systems, allowing them to continue working towards their goals even when the environment changes. While the paper demonstrates the potential benefits through simulation experiments, further research is needed to address practical challenges in physical implementations and explore ways to automatically generate suitable block templates.
Overall, the block-substitution technique represents an important step towards developing more adaptable and resilient robotic and AI systems that can operate effectively in dynamic, unpredictable environments. As the field progresses, techniques like this could enable a new generation of autonomous agents that can compute plans with uniform action costs and partially preserve orders, leading to significant advancements in areas such as robotic manipulation and autonomous decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Improving Execution Concurrency in Partial-Order Plans via Block-Substitution
Sabah Binte Noor, Fazlul Hasan Siddiqui
0
0
Partial-order plans in AI planning facilitate execution flexibility and several other tasks, such as plan reuse, modification, and decomposition, due to their less constrained nature. A Partial-Order Plan (POP) allows two actions with no ordering between them, thus providing the flexibility of executing actions in different sequences. This flexibility can be further extended by enabling parallel execution of actions in a POP to reduce its overall execution time. While extensive studies exist on improving the flexibility of a POP by optimizing its action orderings through plan deordering and reordering, there has been limited focus on the flexibility of executing actions concurrently in a plan. Execution concurrency in a POP can be achieved by incorporating action non-concurrency constraints, specifying which actions can not be executed in parallel. This work formalizes the conditions for non-concurrency constraints to transform a POP into a parallel plan. We also introduce an algorithm to enhance the plan's concurrency by optimizing resource utilization through substitutions of its subplans with respect to the corresponding planning task. Our algorithm employs block deordering that eliminates orderings in a POP by encapsulating coherent actions in blocks, and then exploits blocks as candidate subplans for substitutions. Experiments over the benchmark problems from International Planning Competitions (IPC) exhibit significant improvement in plan concurrency, specifically, with improvement in 25% of the plans, and an overall increase of 2.1% in concurrency.
6/28/2024
Some Orders Are Important: Partially Preserving Orders in Top-Quality Planning
Michael Katz, Junkyu Lee, Jungkoo Kang, Shirin Sohrabi
0
0
The ability to generate multiple plans is central to using planning in real-life applications. Top-quality planners generate sets of such top-cost plans, allowing flexibility in determining equivalent ones. In terms of the order between actions in a plan, the literature only considers two extremes -- either all orders are important, making each plan unique, or all orders are unimportant, treating two plans differing only in the order of actions as equivalent. To allow flexibility in selecting important orders, we propose specifying a subset of actions the orders between which are important, interpolating between the top-quality and unordered top-quality planning problems. We explore the ways of adapting partial order reduction search pruning techniques to address this new computational problem and present experimental evaluations demonstrating the benefits of exploiting such techniques in this setting.
4/3/2024
📶
Solving Sequential Manipulation Puzzles by Finding Easier Subproblems
Svetlana Levit, Joaquim Ortiz-Haro, Marc Toussaint
0
0
We consider a set of challenging sequential manipulation puzzles, where an agent has to interact with multiple movable objects and navigate narrow passages. Such settings are notoriously difficult for Task-and-Motion Planners, as they require interdependent regrasps and solving hard motion planning problems. In this paper, we propose to search over sequences of easier pick-and-place subproblems, which can lead to the solution of the manipulation puzzle. Our method combines a heuristic-driven forward search of subproblems with an optimization-based Task-and-Motion Planning solver. To guide the search, we introduce heuristics to generate and prioritize useful subgoals. We evaluate our approach on various manually designed and automatically generated scenes, demonstrating the benefits of auxiliary subproblems in sequential manipulation planning.
5/6/2024
Task and Motion Planning for Execution in the Real
Tianyang Pan, Rahul Shome, Lydia E. Kavraki
0
0
Task and motion planning represents a powerful set of hybrid planning methods that combine reasoning over discrete task domains and continuous motion generation. Traditional reasoning necessitates task domain models and enough information to ground actions to motion planning queries. Gaps in this knowledge often arise from sources like occlusion or imprecise modeling. This work generates task and motion plans that include actions cannot be fully grounded at planning time. During execution, such an action is handled by a provided human-designed or learned closed-loop behavior. Execution combines offline planned motions and online behaviors till reaching the task goal. Failures of behaviors are fed back as constraints to find new plans. Forty real-robot trials and motivating demonstrations are performed to evaluate the proposed framework and compare against state-of-the-art. Results show faster execution time, less number of actions, and more success in problems where diverse gaps arise. The experiment data is shared for researchers to simulate these settings. The work shows promise in expanding the applicable class of realistic partially grounded problems that robots can address.
6/14/2024