Improving Intervention Efficacy via Concept Realignment in Concept Bottleneck Models
2405.01531
0
0
Abstract
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground image classification on human-understandable concepts to allow for interpretable model decisions. Crucially, the CBM design inherently allows for human interventions, in which expert users are given the ability to modify potentially misaligned concept choices to influence the decision behavior of the model in an interpretable fashion. However, existing approaches often require numerous human interventions per image to achieve strong performances, posing practical challenges in scenarios where obtaining human feedback is expensive. In this paper, we find that this is noticeably driven by an independent treatment of concepts during intervention, wherein a change of one concept does not influence the use of other ones in the model's final decision. To address this issue, we introduce a trainable concept intervention realignment module, which leverages concept relations to realign concept assignments post-intervention. Across standard, real-world benchmarks, we find that concept realignment can significantly improve intervention efficacy; significantly reducing the number of interventions needed to reach a target classification performance or concept prediction accuracy. In addition, it easily integrates into existing concept-based architectures without requiring changes to the models themselves. This reduced cost of human-model collaboration is crucial to enhancing the feasibility of CBMs in resource-constrained environments.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines how to improve the efficacy of interventions in concept bottleneck models, which are a type of machine learning model that learns to predict target variables by first identifying key "concepts" in the input data.
- The key idea is to "realign" the learned concepts in the model to better match the real-world concepts that are most relevant for the target task, in order to make the model's interventions more effective.
- This is demonstrated through experiments on image classification and text understanding tasks, showing improved performance compared to standard concept bottleneck models.
Plain English Explanation
In machine learning, there are certain models called "concept bottleneck models" that work by first identifying key "concepts" in the input data, and then using those concepts to predict the target variable. Concept Bottleneck Models and Incremental Residual Concept Bottleneck Models are examples of this approach.
The idea behind this paper is that if we can "realign" the concepts that the model learns to be more closely matched with the real-world concepts that are most important for the task, then the model's predictions and interventions (changes to the input to affect the output) will be more effective. For example, in an image classification task, the model might learn concepts like "shape" and "texture" - but if the most important real-world concepts are actually things like "material" and "function", then realigning the model's concepts to match those could make its predictions and interventions more useful.
The researchers demonstrate this idea through experiments on both image classification and text understanding tasks, showing that their "concept realignment" approach leads to better performance compared to standard concept bottleneck models. This suggests that carefully aligning the model's internal representations with the true underlying concepts in the data can be an important factor in making these types of models more effective.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contribution of this paper is a method for "concept realignment" in concept bottleneck models. Concept bottleneck models work by first learning to predict a set of "concept" variables from the input, and then using those concepts to predict the target variable. The concept realignment approach proposed here aims to better align the model's learned concepts with the real-world concepts that are most relevant for the target task.
The method works by adding an additional "concept realignment" loss term to the model's training objective. This loss encourages the model to shift the learned concept representations to be more similar to a set of "reference concepts" that are specified as being more relevant for the task. The reference concepts can be obtained in various ways, such as from human annotations or from a separate model trained on a related task.
The paper evaluates this concept realignment approach on both image classification and text understanding tasks. On the image tasks, the model learns concepts like object shape, texture, and material, and the reference concepts are specified based on human judgments of visual attributes. On the text tasks, the model learns linguistic concepts, and the reference concepts are obtained from a separate model trained on a related language understanding task.
The results show that the concept realignment approach leads to improved performance compared to standard concept bottleneck models, as measured by task accuracy as well as the fidelity of the model's interventions (changes to the input that affect the output in a desired way). This demonstrates the potential of carefully aligning a model's internal representations with the true underlying concepts in the data in order to make its predictions and interventions more effective.
Critical Analysis
The concept realignment approach proposed in this paper is a promising direction for improving the efficacy of concept bottleneck models. By aligning the model's learned concepts with more relevant reference concepts, it can lead to better performance and more meaningful interventions.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and open questions. For example, it's not clear how sensitive the approach is to the choice of reference concepts - if the reference concepts are not well-aligned with the true underlying concepts in the data, it could lead to negative effects. Sparse Concept Bottleneck Models and Interpretable by Design explore different ways of learning concept representations, which could potentially be integrated with the concept realignment approach.
Additionally, the experiments in the paper are relatively narrow in scope, focused on specific image and text tasks. More research would be needed to understand how generalizable the concept realignment approach is, and how it might perform on a wider range of applications, particularly in high-stakes domains where model interpretability and intervention efficacy are crucial.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the importance of aligning a model's internal representations with the true underlying concepts in the data. Further research exploring the robustness and generalizability of this approach, as well as integrating it with other techniques for learning interpretable representations, could lead to significant advances in making machine learning models more reliable and effective.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel "concept realignment" approach for improving the efficacy of interventions in concept bottleneck models. By aligning the model's learned concepts with more relevant reference concepts, the approach can lead to better performance and more meaningful interventions on both image classification and text understanding tasks.
The key insight is that carefully aligning a model's internal representations with the true underlying concepts in the data is crucial for making its predictions and interventions more effective. While the paper demonstrates promising results, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and generalizability of this approach.
Overall, this work represents an important step towards developing more interpretable and reliable machine learning models, with potential applications in high-stakes domains where model transparency and the ability to intervene effectively are critical. As the field of AI continues to advance, techniques like concept realignment will likely play an increasingly important role in ensuring these systems are aligned with human values and priorities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔄
Learning to Intervene on Concept Bottlenecks
David Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, Kristian Kersting
0
0
While deep learning models often lack interpretability, concept bottleneck models (CBMs) provide inherent explanations via their concept representations. Moreover, they allow users to perform interventional interactions on these concepts by updating the concept values and thus correcting the predictive output of the model. Up to this point, these interventions were typically applied to the model just once and then discarded. To rectify this, we present concept bottleneck memory models (CB2Ms), which keep a memory of past interventions. Specifically, CB2Ms leverage a two-fold memory to generalize interventions to appropriate novel situations, enabling the model to identify errors and reapply previous interventions. This way, a CB2M learns to automatically improve model performance from a few initially obtained interventions. If no prior human interventions are available, a CB2M can detect potential mistakes of the CBM bottleneck and request targeted interventions. Our experimental evaluations on challenging scenarios like handling distribution shifts and confounded data demonstrate that CB2Ms are able to successfully generalize interventions to unseen data and can indeed identify wrongly inferred concepts. Hence, CB2Ms are a valuable tool for users to provide interactive feedback on CBMs, by guiding a user's interaction and requiring fewer interventions.
6/5/2024
Stochastic Concept Bottleneck Models
Moritz Vandenhirtz, Sonia Laguna, Riv{c}ards Marcinkeviv{c}s, Julia E. Vogt
0
0
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have emerged as a promising interpretable method whose final prediction is based on intermediate, human-understandable concepts rather than the raw input. Through time-consuming manual interventions, a user can correct wrongly predicted concept values to enhance the model's downstream performance. We propose Stochastic Concept Bottleneck Models (SCBMs), a novel approach that models concept dependencies. In SCBMs, a single-concept intervention affects all correlated concepts, thereby improving intervention effectiveness. Unlike previous approaches that model the concept relations via an autoregressive structure, we introduce an explicit, distributional parameterization that allows SCBMs to retain the CBMs' efficient training and inference procedure. Additionally, we leverage the parameterization to derive an effective intervention strategy based on the confidence region. We show empirically on synthetic tabular and natural image datasets that our approach improves intervention effectiveness significantly. Notably, we showcase the versatility and usability of SCBMs by examining a setting with CLIP-inferred concepts, alleviating the need for manual concept annotations.
6/28/2024
Editable Concept Bottleneck Models
Lijie Hu, Chenyang Ren, Zhengyu Hu, Cheng-Long Wang, Di Wang
0
0
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have garnered much attention for their ability to elucidate the prediction process through a human-understandable concept layer. However, most previous studies focused on cases where the data, including concepts, are clean. In many scenarios, we always need to remove/insert some training data or new concepts from trained CBMs due to different reasons, such as privacy concerns, data mislabelling, spurious concepts, and concept annotation errors. Thus, the challenge of deriving efficient editable CBMs without retraining from scratch persists, particularly in large-scale applications. To address these challenges, we propose Editable Concept Bottleneck Models (ECBMs). Specifically, ECBMs support three different levels of data removal: concept-label-level, concept-level, and data-level. ECBMs enjoy mathematically rigorous closed-form approximations derived from influence functions that obviate the need for re-training. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our ECBMs, affirming their adaptability within the realm of CBMs.
5/27/2024
Beyond Concept Bottleneck Models: How to Make Black Boxes Intervenable?
Sonia Laguna, Riv{c}ards Marcinkeviv{c}s, Moritz Vandenhirtz, Julia E. Vogt
0
0
Recently, interpretable machine learning has re-explored concept bottleneck models (CBM). An advantage of this model class is the user's ability to intervene on predicted concept values, affecting the downstream output. In this work, we introduce a method to perform such concept-based interventions on pretrained neural networks, which are not interpretable by design, only given a small validation set with concept labels. Furthermore, we formalise the notion of intervenability as a measure of the effectiveness of concept-based interventions and leverage this definition to fine-tune black boxes. Empirically, we explore the intervenability of black-box classifiers on synthetic tabular and natural image benchmarks. We focus on backbone architectures of varying complexity, from simple, fully connected neural nets to Stable Diffusion. We demonstrate that the proposed fine-tuning improves intervention effectiveness and often yields better-calibrated predictions. To showcase the practical utility of our techniques, we apply them to deep chest X-ray classifiers and show that fine-tuned black boxes are more intervenable than CBMs. Lastly, we establish that our methods are still effective under vision-language-model-based concept annotations, alleviating the need for a human-annotated validation set.
5/28/2024