IncomeSCM: From tabular data set to time-series simulator and causal estimation benchmark
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces IncomeSCM, a tabular data set and time-series simulator for studying causal inference in the domain of income dynamics.
- IncomeSCM provides a benchmark for evaluating causal estimation methods, allowing researchers to test the performance of their algorithms on a realistic but controlled scenario.
- The dataset and simulator are based on a structural causal model that captures key features of income trajectories, including the effects of education, occupation, and other socioeconomic factors.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new tool called IncomeSCM that can be used to study how different factors impact people's incomes over time. IncomeSCM is based on a structural causal model that simulates income trajectories, taking into account things like a person's education, job, and other socioeconomic circumstances.
This tool serves as a benchmark, allowing researchers to test out their causal inference algorithms and see how well they perform at estimating the effects of different factors on people's incomes over time. By using a simulated dataset with known causal relationships, researchers can better evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of their causal estimation methods in a controlled setting.
Technical Explanation
The researchers have created IncomeSCM, a tabular dataset and time-series simulator that can be used to study causal inference in the domain of income dynamics. The dataset and simulator are based on a structural causal model that captures key features of income trajectories, including the effects of education, occupation, and other socioeconomic factors.
IncomeSCM provides a benchmark for evaluating causal estimation methods, allowing researchers to test the performance of their algorithms on a realistic but controlled scenario. By using a simulated dataset with known causal relationships, researchers can better assess the strengths and weaknesses of their causal inference techniques in the context of income trajectories.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that IncomeSCM represents a simplified model of income dynamics and may not capture all the complexities of real-world income trajectories. Additionally, the causal relationships defined in the model may not fully reflect the complex interplay of factors that influence individual incomes.
While IncomeSCM provides a valuable benchmark for evaluating causal estimation methods, the researchers note that the performance of algorithms on this dataset may not directly translate to their effectiveness in real-world causal inference tasks. Further research is needed to understand how the insights gained from IncomeSCM can be applied to more diverse and complex causal inference problems.
Conclusion
The IncomeSCM dataset and time-series simulator provide a valuable tool for researchers studying causal inference in the domain of income dynamics. By offering a controlled and realistic benchmark, IncomeSCM allows for the systematic evaluation of causal estimation methods and can help advance our understanding of the factors that shape individual income trajectories over time.
While the model has some limitations, the insights gained from using IncomeSCM can contribute to the development of more robust and reliable causal inference techniques that can be applied to a wide range of real-world scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
IncomeSCM: From tabular data set to time-series simulator and causal estimation benchmark
Fredrik D. Johansson
Evaluating observational estimators of causal effects demands information that is rarely available: unconfounded interventions and outcomes from the population of interest, created either by randomization or adjustment. As a result, it is customary to fall back on simulators when creating benchmark tasks. Simulators offer great control but are often too simplistic to make challenging tasks, either because they are hand-designed and lack the nuances of real-world data, or because they are fit to observational data without structural constraints. In this work, we propose a general, repeatable strategy for turning observational data into sequential structural causal models and challenging estimation tasks by following two simple principles: 1) fitting real-world data where possible, and 2) creating complexity by composing simple, hand-designed mechanisms. We implement these ideas in a highly configurable software package and apply it to the well-known Adult income data set to construct the tt IncomeSCM simulator. From this, we devise multiple estimation tasks and sample data sets to compare established estimators of causal effects. The tasks present a suitable challenge, with effect estimates varying greatly in quality between methods, despite similar performance in the modeling of factual outcomes, highlighting the need for dedicated causal estimators and model selection criteria.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Standardizing Structural Causal Models
Weronika Ormaniec, Scott Sussex, Lars Lorch, Bernhard Scholkopf, Andreas Krause
Synthetic datasets generated by structural causal models (SCMs) are commonly used for benchmarking causal structure learning algorithms. However, the variances and pairwise correlations in SCM data tend to increase along the causal ordering. Several popular algorithms exploit these artifacts, possibly leading to conclusions that do not generalize to real-world settings. Existing metrics like $operatorname{Var}$-sortability and $operatorname{R^2}$-sortability quantify these patterns, but they do not provide tools to remedy them. To address this, we propose internally-standardized structural causal models (iSCMs), a modification of SCMs that introduces a standardization operation at each variable during the generative process. By construction, iSCMs are not $operatorname{Var}$-sortable, and as we show experimentally, not $operatorname{R^2}$-sortable either for commonly-used graph families. Moreover, contrary to the post-hoc standardization of data generated by standard SCMs, we prove that linear iSCMs are less identifiable from prior knowledge on the weights and do not collapse to deterministic relationships in large systems, which may make iSCMs a useful model in causal inference beyond the benchmarking problem studied here.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Causal Discovery in Semi-Stationary Time Series
Shanyun Gao, Raghavendra Addanki, Tong Yu, Ryan A. Rossi, Murat Kocaoglu
Discovering causal relations from observational time series without making the stationary assumption is a significant challenge. In practice, this challenge is common in many areas, such as retail sales, transportation systems, and medical science. Here, we consider this problem for a class of non-stationary time series. The structural causal model (SCM) of this type of time series, called the semi-stationary time series, exhibits that a finite number of different causal mechanisms occur sequentially and periodically across time. This model holds considerable practical utility because it can represent periodicity, including common occurrences such as seasonality and diurnal variation. We propose a constraint-based, non-parametric algorithm for discovering causal relations in this setting. The resulting algorithm, PCMCI$_{Omega}$, can capture the alternating and recurring changes in the causal mechanisms and then identify the underlying causal graph with conditional independence (CI) tests. We show that this algorithm is sound in identifying causal relations on discrete time series. We validate the algorithm with extensive experiments on continuous and discrete simulated data. We also apply our algorithm to a real-world climate dataset.
Read more7/11/2024
0
Causality for Tabular Data Synthesis: A High-Order Structure Causal Benchmark Framework
Ruibo Tu, Zineb Senane, Lele Cao, Cheng Zhang, Hedvig Kjellstrom, Gustav Eje Henter
Tabular synthesis models remain ineffective at capturing complex dependencies, and the quality of synthetic data is still insufficient for comprehensive downstream tasks, such as prediction under distribution shifts, automated decision-making, and cross-table understanding. A major challenge is the lack of prior knowledge about underlying structures and high-order relationships in tabular data. We argue that a systematic evaluation on high-order structural information for tabular data synthesis is the first step towards solving the problem. In this paper, we introduce high-order structural causal information as natural prior knowledge and provide a benchmark framework for the evaluation of tabular synthesis models. The framework allows us to generate benchmark datasets with a flexible range of data generation processes and to train tabular synthesis models using these datasets for further evaluation. We propose multiple benchmark tasks, high-order metrics, and causal inference tasks as downstream tasks for evaluating the quality of synthetic data generated by the trained models. Our experiments demonstrate to leverage the benchmark framework for evaluating the model capability of capturing high-order structural causal information. Furthermore, our benchmarking results provide an initial assessment of state-of-the-art tabular synthesis models. They have clearly revealed significant gaps between ideal and actual performance and how baseline methods differ. Our benchmark framework is available at URL https://github.com/TURuibo/CauTabBench.
Read more7/8/2024