Instruction Matters, a Simple yet Effective Task Selection Approach in Instruction Tuning for Specific Tasks

Read original: arXiv:2404.16418 - Published 4/26/2024 by Changho Lee, Janghoon Han, Seonghyeon Ye, Stanley Jungkyu Choi, Honglak Lee, Kyunghoon Bae
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Instruction tuning can enhance zero-shot generalization and improve performance on specific tasks.
  • Selecting the right set of related tasks is crucial for effective instruction tuning.
  • This research shows that instruction information alone can be used to identify pertinent tasks for instruction tuning, simplifying the process.
  • Additionally, learning the instructional template style of the meta-dataset further improves task selection accuracy and overall performance.

Plain English Explanation

Instruction tuning is a technique that can help machine learning models become better at a wide range of tasks, even tasks they haven't seen before. The key is to train the model on a carefully selected set of related tasks that provide meaningful supervision. Traditionally, this task selection process has been complex, requiring measurements of how well tasks can transfer knowledge to each other or the creation of new data samples for the target task.

This research paper reveals a simpler approach. It shows that by just looking at the instructions or descriptions of different tasks, a model can figure out which ones are most relevant and useful for enhancing its performance on a specific task. This is notable because it avoids the need for the complex measurements or additional data creation required by previous methods.

Furthermore, the researchers found that if the model also learns the unique style of the instructions in the dataset, it can select the most pertinent tasks even more accurately. This leads to even greater improvements in the model's overall performance on benchmark tests like P3, Big-Bench, NIV2, and Big-Bench Hard.

Technical Explanation

The core idea of this research is that instruction information alone can be leveraged to identify relevant tasks for instruction tuning, simplifying the task selection process compared to traditional methods. The researchers hypothesized that by learning the unique instructional template style of the meta-dataset, the model could further improve its task selection accuracy, leading to enhanced overall performance.

To test this, the researchers trained models on a small set of tasks chosen solely based on the instructions, without any complex measurements of task transferability or creation of additional data samples. The results showed that this approach led to substantial performance improvements on various benchmarks, exceeding the gains achieved by prior task selection methods.

The researchers attribute this success to the model's ability to effectively identify pertinent tasks for instruction tuning by analyzing the instruction information alone, and to further boost performance by learning the instructional template style of the meta-dataset.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling and straightforward approach to instruction tuning that simplifies the task selection process. However, the researchers acknowledge that their method relies on the availability of high-quality instruction information, which may not always be the case, particularly for more specialized or niche tasks.

Additionally, while the performance improvements on the tested benchmarks are significant, it would be valuable to understand the limits of this approach. For example, how well does it scale to an even broader range of tasks, and are there any specific types of tasks or domains where it may struggle?

Further research could also explore the interplay between instruction-based task selection and other factors, such as data quality, model architecture, and the specific characteristics of the target task. Investigating these aspects could provide deeper insights into the strengths and limitations of the proposed approach.

Conclusion

This research demonstrates a novel and efficient method for instruction tuning that leverages instruction information alone to identify relevant tasks, without the need for complex task transferability measurements or additional data creation. By also learning the instructional template style of the meta-dataset, the model can further improve its task selection accuracy, leading to substantial performance gains on various benchmarks.

The simplicity and effectiveness of this approach highlight its potential to streamline the instruction tuning process and enable more widespread adoption of this powerful technique. As the field of language models continues to evolve, innovations like this can help push the boundaries of what these models can achieve, ultimately leading to more capable and versatile AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

Instruction Matters, a Simple yet Effective Task Selection Approach in Instruction Tuning for Specific Tasks

Changho Lee, Janghoon Han, Seonghyeon Ye, Stanley Jungkyu Choi, Honglak Lee, Kyunghoon Bae

Instruction tuning has shown its ability to not only enhance zero-shot generalization across various tasks but also its effectiveness in improving the performance of specific tasks. A crucial aspect in instruction tuning for a particular task is a strategic selection of related tasks that offer meaningful supervision, thereby enhancing efficiency and preventing performance degradation from irrelevant tasks. Our research reveals that leveraging instruction information textit{alone} enables the identification of pertinent tasks for instruction tuning. This approach is notably simpler compared to traditional methods that necessitate complex measurements of pairwise transferability between tasks or the creation of data samples for the target task. Furthermore, by additionally learning the unique instructional template style of the meta-dataset, we observe an improvement in task selection accuracy, which contributes to enhanced overall performance. Experimental results demonstrate that training on a small set of tasks, chosen solely based on the instructions, leads to substantial performance improvements on benchmarks like P3, Big-Bench, NIV2, and Big-Bench Hard. Significantly, these improvements exceed those achieved by prior task selection methods, highlighting the efficacy of our approach.

Read more

4/26/2024

From Symbolic Tasks to Code Generation: Diversification Yields Better Task Performers
Total Score

0

From Symbolic Tasks to Code Generation: Diversification Yields Better Task Performers

Dylan Zhang, Justin Wang, Francois Charton

Instruction tuning -- tuning large language models on instruction-output pairs -- is a promising technique for making models better adapted to the real world. Yet, the key factors driving the model's capability to understand and follow instructions not seen during training remain under-explored. Our investigation begins with a series of synthetic experiments within the theoretical framework of a Turing-complete algorithm called Markov algorithm, which allows fine-grained control over the instruction-tuning data. Generalization and robustness with respect to the training distribution emerge once a diverse enough set of tasks is provided, even though very few examples are provided for each task. We extend these initial results to a real-world application scenario of code generation and find that a more diverse instruction set, extending beyond code-related tasks, improves the performance of code generation. Our observations suggest that a more diverse semantic space for instruction-tuning sets greatly improves the model's ability to follow instructions and perform tasks.

Read more

6/3/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Instruction Tuning with Human Curriculum

Bruce W. Lee, Hyunsoo Cho, Kang Min Yoo

In this work, we (1) introduce Curriculum Instruction Tuning, (2) explore the potential advantages of employing diverse curriculum strategies, and (3) delineate a synthetic instruction-response generation framework that complements our theoretical approach. Distinct from the existing instruction tuning dataset, our generation pipeline is systematically structured to emulate the sequential and orderly characteristic of human learning. Additionally, we describe a methodology for generating instruction-response datasets that extensively span the various stages of human education, from middle school through the graduate level, utilizing educational subject catalogs. Before training, we meticulously organize the instruction data to ensure that questions escalate in difficulty regarding (A) the subject matter and (B) the intricacy of the instructions. The findings of our study reveal that substantial improvements in performance can be achieved through the mere application of curriculum ordering to instruction data (achieving gains of +4.76 on TruthfulQA, +2.98 on MMLU, +2.8 on OpenbookQA, and +1.28 on ARC-hard) compared to random shuffling. This enhancement is achieved without incurring additional computational expenses. Through comprehensive experimentation, we observe that the advantages of our proposed method are consistently evident across nine benchmarks.

Read more

6/18/2024

Total Score

0

Instruction Tuning With Loss Over Instructions

Zhengyan Shi, Adam X. Yang, Bin Wu, Laurence Aitchison, Emine Yilmaz, Aldo Lipani

Instruction tuning plays a crucial role in shaping the outputs of language models (LMs) to desired styles. In this work, we propose a simple yet effective method, Instruction Modelling (IM), which trains LMs by applying a loss function to the instruction and prompt part rather than solely to the output part. Through experiments across 21 diverse benchmarks, we show that, in many scenarios, IM can effectively improve the LM performance on both NLP tasks (e.g., MMLU, TruthfulQA, and HumanEval) and open-ended generation benchmarks (e.g., MT-Bench and AlpacaEval). Remarkably, in the most advantageous case, IM boosts model performance on AlpacaEval 1.0 by over 100%. We identify two key factors influencing the effectiveness of IM: (1) The ratio between instruction length and output length in the training data; and (2) The number of training examples. We observe that IM is especially beneficial when trained on datasets with lengthy instructions paired with brief outputs, or under the Superficial Alignment Hypothesis (SAH) where a small amount of training examples are used for instruction tuning. Further analysis substantiates our hypothesis that the improvement can be attributed to reduced overfitting to instruction tuning datasets. Our work provides practical guidance for instruction tuning LMs, especially in low-resource scenarios.

Read more

5/24/2024