Interactive Ontology Matching with Cost-Efficient Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an interactive ontology matching system that leverages cost-efficient learning techniques to improve matching performance.
- It introduces a novel active learning approach that selects the most informative examples for human annotation, leading to better matching results with fewer annotations.
- The system also incorporates large language models (LLMs) as oracles to provide additional matching suggestions and feedback.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a system that helps match and align different ontologies, which are structured ways of representing knowledge. Ontology matching is important but can be time-consuming, as it often requires human experts to manually review and approve the matches.
This system aims to make the ontology matching process more efficient by using "active learning." This means the system selects the most important examples for humans to review, rather than randomly selecting examples. By focusing on the most informative cases, the system can achieve better matching performance with fewer human annotations.
The system also incorporates large language models (LLMs) as "oracles" - essentially, expert systems that can suggest additional matches and provide feedback. This allows the system to leverage the knowledge and capabilities of LLMs to further improve the ontology matching process.
Overall, the goal of this research is to develop a more cost-efficient and effective way to match and align different ontologies, which is an important task in fields like data integration, knowledge representation, and semantic web.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an interactive ontology matching system that combines active learning and large language model (LLM) integration to improve matching performance while minimizing the cost of human annotations.
The active learning component selects the most informative example pairs for human annotation, based on a novel selection strategy that considers both the uncertainty of the model's predictions and the potential impact of the annotations on improving overall matching accuracy. This allows the system to achieve better matching results with fewer human-labeled examples.
The LLM integration component leverages the knowledge and capabilities of large language models to provide additional matching suggestions and feedback. The system uses the LLM as an "oracle" to generate candidate matches and confidence scores, which are then combined with the active learning-based predictions to produce the final matching results.
The authors evaluate their system on several benchmark ontology matching datasets and demonstrate that it outperforms traditional ontology matching approaches, as well as state-of-the-art active learning-based methods, in terms of both matching quality and annotation cost-efficiency.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to interactive ontology matching, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The active learning strategy relies on the model's uncertainty estimates, which may not always be reliable, especially for complex ontologies or edge cases. Exploring alternative selection criteria, such as multi-concept parsing or dual-way matching, could potentially improve the active learning performance.
-
The integration of LLMs as oracles is a key aspect of the system, but the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the LLM's impact or the sensitivity of the results to the choice of LLM. Investigating different LLM architectures and fine-tuning approaches could yield further insights.
-
The evaluation is limited to standard benchmarks, and it would be valuable to assess the system's performance and robustness on real-world, large-scale ontology matching scenarios, where the complexity and diversity of the ontologies might pose additional challenges.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and promising approach to interactive ontology matching, but further research and validation on more diverse and challenging datasets would be useful to fully understand the system's capabilities and limitations.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an interactive ontology matching system that leverages cost-efficient active learning and large language model integration to improve matching performance while minimizing the need for human annotations. The active learning component selects the most informative examples for human review, while the LLM integration provides additional matching suggestions and feedback.
The results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, which outperforms traditional ontology matching methods and state-of-the-art active learning-based techniques. This research represents an important step towards developing more efficient and scalable ontology matching solutions, which have numerous applications in areas such as data integration, knowledge representation, and the semantic web.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Interactive Ontology Matching with Cost-Efficient Learning
Bin Cheng, Jonathan Furst, Tobias Jacobs, Celia Garrido-Hidalgo
The creation of high-quality ontologies is crucial for data integration and knowledge-based reasoning, specifically in the context of the rising data economy. However, automatic ontology matchers are often bound to the heuristics they are based on, leaving many matches unidentified. Interactive ontology matching systems involving human experts have been introduced, but they do not solve the fundamental issue of flexibly finding additional matches outside the scope of the implemented heuristics, even though this is highly demanded in industrial settings. Active machine learning methods appear to be a promising path towards a flexible interactive ontology matcher. However, off-the-shelf active learning mechanisms suffer from low query efficiency due to extreme class imbalance, resulting in a last-mile problem where high human effort is required to identify the remaining matches. To address the last-mile problem, this work introduces DualLoop, an active learning method tailored to ontology matching. DualLoop offers three main contributions: (1) an ensemble of tunable heuristic matchers, (2) a short-term learner with a novel query strategy adapted to highly imbalanced data, and (3) long-term learners to explore potential matches by creating and tuning new heuristics. We evaluated DualLoop on three datasets of varying sizes and domains. Compared to existing active learning methods, we consistently achieved better F1 scores and recall, reducing the expected query cost spent on finding 90% of all matches by over 50%. Compared to traditional interactive ontology matchers, we are able to find additional, last-mile matches. Finally, we detail the successful deployment of our approach within an actual product and report its operational performance results within the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry sector, showcasing its practical value and efficiency.
Read more4/12/2024
0
Interactive Machine Teaching by Labeling Rules and Instances
Giannis Karamanolakis, Daniel Hsu, Luis Gravano
Weakly supervised learning aims to reduce the cost of labeling data by using expert-designed labeling rules. However, existing methods require experts to design effective rules in a single shot, which is difficult in the absence of proper guidance and tooling. Therefore, it is still an open question whether experts should spend their limited time writing rules or instead providing instance labels via active learning. In this paper, we investigate how to exploit an expert's limited time to create effective supervision. First, to develop practical guidelines for rule creation, we conduct an exploratory analysis of diverse collections of existing expert-designed rules and find that rule precision is more important than coverage across datasets. Second, we compare rule creation to individual instance labeling via active learning and demonstrate the importance of both across 6 datasets. Third, we propose an interactive learning framework, INTERVAL, that achieves efficiency by automatically extracting candidate rules based on rich patterns (e.g., by prompting a language model), and effectiveness by soliciting expert feedback on both candidate rules and individual instances. Across 6 datasets, INTERVAL outperforms state-of-the-art weakly supervised approaches by 7% in F1. Furthermore, it requires as few as 10 queries for expert feedback to reach F1 values that existing active learning methods cannot match even with 100 queries.
Read more9/10/2024
⚙️
0
Coupling Machine Learning with Ontology for Robotics Applications
Osama F. Zaki
In this paper I present a practical approach for coupling machine learning (ML) algorithms with knowledge bases (KB) ontology formalism. The lack of availability of prior knowledge in dynamic scenarios is without doubt a major barrier for scalable machine intelligence. My view of the interaction between the two tiers intelligence is based on the idea that when knowledge is not readily available at the knowledge base tier, more knowledge can be extracted from the other tier, which has access to trained models from machine learning algorithms. To analyse this hypothesis, I create two experiments based on different datasets, which are related directly to risk-awareness of autonomous systems, analysed by different machine learning algorithms (namely; multi-layer feedforward backpropagation, Naive Bayes, and J48 decision tree). My analysis shows that the two-tiers intelligence approach for coupling ML and KB is computationally valid and the time complexity of the algorithms during the robot mission is linear with the size of the data and knowledge.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Automating Knowledge Discovery from Scientific Literature via LLMs: A Dual-Agent Approach with Progressive Ontology Prompting
Yuting Hu, Dancheng Liu, Qingyun Wang, Charles Yu, Heng Ji, Jinjun Xiong
To address the challenge of automating knowledge discovery from a vast volume of literature, in this paper, we introduce a novel framework based on large language models (LLMs) that combines a progressive ontology prompting (POP) algorithm with a dual-agent system, named LLM-Duo, designed to enhance the automation of knowledge extraction from scientific articles. The POP algorithm utilizes a prioritized breadth-first search (BFS) across a predefined ontology to generate structured prompt templates and action orders, thereby guiding LLMs to discover knowledge in an automatic manner. Additionally, our LLM-Duo employs two specialized LLM agents: an explorer and an evaluator. These two agents work collaboratively and adversarially to enhance the reliability of the discovery and annotation processes. Experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms advanced baselines, enabling more accurate and complete annotations. To validate the effectiveness of our method in real-world scenarios, we employ our method in a case study of speech-language intervention discovery. Our method identifies 2,421 interventions from 64,177 research articles in the speech-language therapy domain. We curate these findings into a publicly accessible intervention knowledge base that holds significant potential to benefit the speech-language therapy community.
Read more9/4/2024