Interpretability in Symbolic Regression: a benchmark of Explanatory Methods using the Feynman data set

Overview

• This paper focuses on the importance of interpretability in machine learning models, beyond just model accuracy.
• Interpretability allows users to trust the predictions, verify model properties, and enforce fairness.
• Many model-agnostic explanation methods exist for black-box models, but interpretability is still a challenge.
• The researchers propose a benchmark to evaluate explanatory methods for regression models, particularly symbolic regression.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models can be very accurate at making predictions, but it's not always easy to understand how they arrive at those predictions. This can be a problem, as users need to be able to trust the model and verify that it's behaving fairly.

To address this, the researchers looked at different ways to explain how machine learning models make their predictions, focusing on regression tasks. One approach they explored was symbolic regression, which tries to find simple mathematical equations that fit the data. This can produce models that are more interpretable than "black box" machine learning models.

The researchers also evaluated various explanation methods, like Partial Effects and SHAP, to see how well they could explain the outputs of different regression models, both interpretable and non-interpretable.

The key finding was that symbolic regression models were able to produce accurate and interpretable results, outperforming some of the black box models. The researchers also found that Partial Effects and SHAP were the most robust explanation methods, able to provide clear insights into how the models were making their predictions.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted experiments using 100 physics equations to evaluate different regression methods, both interpretable (like symbolic regression) and non-interpretable, as well as popular explanation techniques such as Partial Effects, SHAP, and Integrated Gradients.

The results showed that symbolic regression models were able to achieve accurate predictions while also providing interpretable outputs in the form of simple mathematical equations. This makes symbolic regression an interesting alternative to both white-box and black-box regression models.

When evaluating the different explanation methods, the researchers found that Partial Effects and SHAP were the most robust, consistently providing clear insights into how the models were making their predictions. Integrated Gradients, on the other hand, was less stable, especially when used with tree-based models.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that interpretability is a subjective and sometimes ill-defined concept, which makes it challenging to evaluate. They also note that the benchmark they developed, while publicly available, may need further refinement and expansion to cover a wider range of regression tasks and models.

Additionally, the experiments were limited to 100 physics equations, which may not fully capture the diversity of real-world regression problems. Further testing on a broader range of datasets and applications would be useful to validate the findings.

While the results suggest that symbolic regression can be a promising approach for interpretable modeling, the researchers do not provide a detailed comparison to other white-box regression techniques, such as decision trees or linear models. A more comprehensive analysis of the trade-offs between model accuracy, interpretability, and computational complexity would be valuable.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the importance of interpretability in machine learning models, beyond just model accuracy. The researchers propose a benchmark for evaluating explanation methods, and their experiments show that symbolic regression can be a viable approach for producing accurate and interpretable regression models.

The findings suggest that tools like Partial Effects and SHAP can provide robust and insightful explanations, helping users to understand and trust the predictions of machine learning models. This has important implications for fields where model transparency and fairness are critical, such as medical decision-making or wildfire prediction.

Overall, this research contributes to the ongoing efforts to make machine learning models more interpretable and accountable, which will be crucial as these technologies become more widely adopted in high-stakes applications.