Investigating Imperceptibility of Adversarial Attacks on Tabular Data: An Empirical Analysis
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the imperceptibility of adversarial attacks on tabular data, which are small, carefully crafted changes to data that can mislead machine learning models.
- The researchers conduct an empirical analysis to understand how different adversarial attack techniques affect the imperceptibility of the resulting perturbed data samples.
- They evaluate a range of attack methods across various tabular datasets and model architectures, measuring both the attack success rate and the imperceptibility of the generated adversarial examples.
Plain English Explanation
In the world of machine learning, researchers are constantly working to improve the security and robustness of models. One area of concern is adversarial attacks, where small, subtle changes are made to data inputs to trick the model into making incorrect predictions. This paper focuses on understanding how these adversarial attacks can be made imperceptible - in other words, how the changes can be made so small that they are almost impossible for a human to detect.
The researchers in this paper evaluated a range of different adversarial attack techniques on tabular data, which is data organized in rows and columns, like a spreadsheet. They looked at how successful the attacks were at fooling the machine learning models, and also how imperceptible the changes were to human eyes.
The key insights from this research are that some attack methods are better than others at generating imperceptible adversarial examples. The researchers found that attacks that carefully constrain the changes to stay close to the original data tend to be more imperceptible, while attacks that make larger changes are more noticeable. This has important implications for both developing more robust machine learning models and understanding the security threats posed by adversarial attacks.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the imperceptibility of adversarial attacks on tabular data, where small, carefully crafted perturbations are applied to the input data to mislead machine learning models. The researchers evaluate a range of different adversarial attack techniques, including constrained attacks, dimensionality-based attacks, and semantic-based attacks.
They measure both the attack success rate, which indicates how effective the attacks are at fooling the models, and the imperceptibility of the resulting adversarial examples, using metrics like perceptual similarity and human evaluation.
The key findings are that attack techniques that carefully constrain the perturbations to stay close to the original data tend to produce more imperceptible adversarial examples, while attacks that make larger changes are more noticeable to humans. The researchers also find that the specific model architecture and dataset can influence the imperceptibility of the attacks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive empirical analysis of the imperceptibility of adversarial attacks on tabular data, which is an important and understudied area of research. The researchers have carefully designed their experiments to evaluate a range of attack techniques across different datasets and models, providing valuable insights into the trade-offs between attack success and imperceptibility.
However, the paper does not explore the potential real-world implications of these findings, such as how adversarial attacks could be used to manipulate sensitive data or decisions in practical applications. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the ethical considerations around the development and use of adversarial attacks, even if they are "imperceptible."
Further research could explore the potential countermeasures or defenses against these types of attacks, as well as investigate the broader societal impacts of adversarial machine learning techniques. Watermarking tabular datasets could be one potential approach to enhance the security and robustness of machine learning systems.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the imperceptibility of adversarial attacks on tabular data, highlighting that some attack techniques are better than others at generating perturbations that are difficult for humans to detect. These findings have important implications for developing more robust and secure machine learning models, as well as understanding the potential security threats posed by adversarial attacks. However, further research is needed to explore the real-world applications and ethical considerations of this technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Investigating Imperceptibility of Adversarial Attacks on Tabular Data: An Empirical Analysis
Zhipeng He, Chun Ouyang, Laith Alzubaidi, Alistair Barros, Catarina Moreira
Adversarial attacks are a potential threat to machine learning models by causing incorrect predictions through imperceptible perturbations to the input data. While these attacks have been extensively studied in unstructured data like images, applying them to tabular data, poses new challenges. These challenges arise from the inherent heterogeneity and complex feature interdependencies in tabular data, which differ from the image data. To account for this distinction, it is necessary to establish tailored imperceptibility criteria specific to tabular data. However, there is currently a lack of standardised metrics for assessing the imperceptibility of adversarial attacks on tabular data. To address this gap, we propose a set of key properties and corresponding metrics designed to comprehensively characterise imperceptible adversarial attacks on tabular data. These are: proximity to the original input, sparsity of altered features, deviation from the original data distribution, sensitivity in perturbing features with narrow distribution, immutability of certain features that should remain unchanged, feasibility of specific feature values that should not go beyond valid practical ranges, and feature interdependencies capturing complex relationships between data attributes. We evaluate the imperceptibility of five adversarial attacks, including both bounded attacks and unbounded attacks, on tabular data using the proposed imperceptibility metrics. The results reveal a trade-off between the imperceptibility and effectiveness of these attacks. The study also identifies limitations in current attack algorithms, offering insights that can guide future research in the area. The findings gained from this empirical analysis provide valuable direction for enhancing the design of adversarial attack algorithms, thereby advancing adversarial machine learning on tabular data.
Read more8/22/2024
0
TabularBench: Benchmarking Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Deep Learning in Real-world Use-cases
Thibault Simonetto, Salah Ghamizi, Maxime Cordy
While adversarial robustness in computer vision is a mature research field, fewer researchers have tackled the evasion attacks against tabular deep learning, and even fewer investigated robustification mechanisms and reliable defenses. We hypothesize that this lag in the research on tabular adversarial attacks is in part due to the lack of standardized benchmarks. To fill this gap, we propose TabularBench, the first comprehensive benchmark of robustness of tabular deep learning classification models. We evaluated adversarial robustness with CAA, an ensemble of gradient and search attacks which was recently demonstrated as the most effective attack against a tabular model. In addition to our open benchmark (https://github.com/serval-uni-lu/tabularbench) where we welcome submissions of new models and defenses, we implement 7 robustification mechanisms inspired by state-of-the-art defenses in computer vision and propose the largest benchmark of robust tabular deep learning over 200 models across five critical scenarios in finance, healthcare and security. We curated real datasets for each use case, augmented with hundreds of thousands of realistic synthetic inputs, and trained and assessed our models with and without data augmentations. We open-source our library that provides API access to all our pre-trained robust tabular models, and the largest datasets of real and synthetic tabular inputs. Finally, we analyze the impact of various defenses on the robustness and provide actionable insights to design new defenses and robustification mechanisms.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Constrained Adaptive Attack: Effective Adversarial Attack Against Deep Neural Networks for Tabular Data
Thibault Simonetto, Salah Ghamizi, Maxime Cordy
State-of-the-art deep learning models for tabular data have recently achieved acceptable performance to be deployed in industrial settings. However, the robustness of these models remains scarcely explored. Contrary to computer vision, there are no effective attacks to properly evaluate the adversarial robustness of deep tabular models due to intrinsic properties of tabular data, such as categorical features, immutability, and feature relationship constraints. To fill this gap, we first propose CAPGD, a gradient attack that overcomes the failures of existing gradient attacks with adaptive mechanisms. This new attack does not require parameter tuning and further degrades the accuracy, up to 81% points compared to the previous gradient attacks. Second, we design CAA, an efficient evasion attack that combines our CAPGD attack and MOEVA, the best search-based attack. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our attacks on five architectures and four critical use cases. Our empirical study demonstrates that CAA outperforms all existing attacks in 17 over the 20 settings, and leads to a drop in the accuracy by up to 96.1% points and 21.9% points compared to CAPGD and MOEVA respectively while being up to five times faster than MOEVA. Given the effectiveness and efficiency of our new attacks, we argue that they should become the minimal test for any new defense or robust architectures in tabular machine learning.
Read more6/4/2024
🎲
0
How adversarial attacks can disrupt seemingly stable accurate classifiers
Oliver J. Sutton, Qinghua Zhou, Ivan Y. Tyukin, Alexander N. Gorban, Alexander Bastounis, Desmond J. Higham
Adversarial attacks dramatically change the output of an otherwise accurate learning system using a seemingly inconsequential modification to a piece of input data. Paradoxically, empirical evidence indicates that even systems which are robust to large random perturbations of the input data remain susceptible to small, easily constructed, adversarial perturbations of their inputs. Here, we show that this may be seen as a fundamental feature of classifiers working with high dimensional input data. We introduce a simple generic and generalisable framework for which key behaviours observed in practical systems arise with high probability -- notably the simultaneous susceptibility of the (otherwise accurate) model to easily constructed adversarial attacks, and robustness to random perturbations of the input data. We confirm that the same phenomena are directly observed in practical neural networks trained on standard image classification problems, where even large additive random noise fails to trigger the adversarial instability of the network. A surprising takeaway is that even small margins separating a classifier's decision surface from training and testing data can hide adversarial susceptibility from being detected using randomly sampled perturbations. Counterintuitively, using additive noise during training or testing is therefore inefficient for eradicating or detecting adversarial examples, and more demanding adversarial training is required.
Read more9/10/2024