Investigating the Role of Explainability and AI Literacy in User Compliance
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- AI is becoming increasingly common across various domains
- However, AI-based systems are often "black-boxed," meaning their decision-making logic is opaque to users
- This makes it challenging for users to comply with the recommendations made by these AI systems
- Researchers are investigating Explainable AI (XAI) to increase the transparency of the underlying machine learning models
- It's unclear what types of explanations are effective and what other factors increase user compliance
Plain English Explanation
As AI models become more advanced and widespread, they are being used to make important decisions in many areas of our lives. However, these AI systems are often like "black boxes" - their inner workings and decision-making processes are not easily understood by the people using them. This can make it difficult for users to trust and follow the recommendations provided by these AI systems.
To address this, researchers are exploring a concept called Explainable AI (XAI). The goal of XAI is to make the underlying machine learning models more transparent and understandable. But it's not clear what types of explanations are most effective in helping users comply with the AI's recommendations. The researchers also wanted to understand how a user's own understanding of AI (their "AI literacy") might play a role in this.
To investigate these factors, the researchers conducted an experiment with 562 participants. They presented the participants with recommendations from an AI system, along with two different types of XAI explanations. The researchers found that providing XAI explanations did increase user compliance, but this was also influenced by the participants' level of AI literacy. They also discovered that the relationship between XAI, AI literacy, and user compliance was mediated by the participants' mental model, or understanding, of how the AI system works.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted an experiment with 562 participants to investigate the factors that influence user compliance with AI-based recommendations, particularly in the context of Explainable AI (XAI).
The participants were presented with recommendations from an AI system, along with two different types of XAI explanations: one that provided detailed, low-level information about the AI's decision-making process, and another that offered more high-level, conceptual explanations.
The researchers found that the introduction of XAI explanations did increase user compliance with the AI's recommendations. However, this effect was also influenced by the participants' level of AI literacy - their understanding and knowledge of how AI systems work.
Furthermore, the researchers discovered that the relationship between XAI, AI literacy, and user compliance was mediated by the participants' mental model, or their underlying understanding, of how the AI system operates. This suggests that the way users perceive and conceptualize the AI system plays a crucial role in determining their willingness to comply with its recommendations.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research in their paper. They note that the experiment was conducted in a controlled, laboratory setting, and it's unclear how the findings would translate to real-world, complex decision-making scenarios. Additionally, the researchers only examined two specific types of XAI explanations, and there may be other forms of explanation that could be more effective in increasing user compliance.
It's also worth considering the potential pitfalls of over-reliance on XAI. While increased transparency can help build trust, it's important to ensure that users don't develop a "false sense of security" about the AI's capabilities and limitations. Further research is needed to understand the long-term implications of XAI on user behavior and decision-making.
Conclusion
This study highlights the importance of considering both the technical and the human factors when designing AI-based systems that aim to influence user behavior. While Explainable AI can help increase user compliance, the researchers found that this effect is also shaped by the user's own understanding of AI technology. Ultimately, successfully deploying AI systems in real-world contexts will require a nuanced approach that addresses the complex interplay between the AI's explanations, the user's mental model, and their overall AI literacy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Investigating the Role of Explainability and AI Literacy in User Compliance
Niklas Kuhl, Christian Meske, Maximilian Nitsche, Jodie Lobana
AI is becoming increasingly common across different domains. However, as sophisticated AI-based systems are often black-boxed, rendering the decision-making logic opaque, users find it challenging to comply with their recommendations. Although researchers are investigating Explainable AI (XAI) to increase the transparency of the underlying machine learning models, it is unclear what types of explanations are effective and what other factors increase compliance. To better understand the interplay of these factors, we conducted an experiment with 562 participants who were presented with the recommendations of an AI and two different types of XAI. We find that users' compliance increases with the introduction of XAI but is also affected by AI literacy. We also find that the relationships between AI literacy XAI and users' compliance are mediated by the users' mental model of AI. Our study has several implications for successfully designing AI-based systems utilizing XAI.
Read more6/19/2024
🤿
0
The Drawback of Insight: Detailed Explanations Can Reduce Agreement with XAI
Sabid Bin Habib Pias, Alicia Freel, Timothy Trammel, Taslima Akter, Donald Williamson, Apu Kapadia
With the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based decision-making, explanations help increase new technology adoption through enhanced trust and reliability. However, our experimental study challenges the notion that every user universally values explanations. We argue that the agreement with AI suggestions, whether accompanied by explanations or not, is influenced by individual differences in personality traits and the users' comfort with technology. We found that people with higher neuroticism and lower technological comfort showed more agreement with the recommendations without explanations. As more users become exposed to eXplainable AI (XAI) and AI-based systems, we argue that the XAI design should not provide explanations for users with high neuroticism and low technology comfort. Prioritizing user personalities in XAI systems will help users become better collaborators of AI systems.
Read more5/1/2024
0
Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems
Fatima Ezzeddine
Machine learning (ML) models, demonstrably powerful, suffer from a lack of interpretability. The absence of transparency, often referred to as the black box nature of ML models, undermines trust and urges the need for efforts to enhance their explainability. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques address this challenge by providing frameworks and methods to explain the internal decision-making processes of these complex models. Techniques like Counterfactual Explanations (CF) and Feature Importance play a crucial role in achieving this goal. Furthermore, high-quality and diverse data remains the foundational element for robust and trustworthy ML applications. In many applications, the data used to train ML and XAI explainers contain sensitive information. In this context, numerous privacy-preserving techniques can be employed to safeguard sensitive information in the data, such as differential privacy. Subsequently, a conflict between XAI and privacy solutions emerges due to their opposing goals. Since XAI techniques provide reasoning for the model behavior, they reveal information relative to ML models, such as their decision boundaries, the values of features, or the gradients of deep learning models when explanations are exposed to a third entity. Attackers can initiate privacy breaching attacks using these explanations, to perform model extraction, inference, and membership attacks. This dilemma underscores the challenge of finding the right equilibrium between understanding ML decision-making and safeguarding privacy.
Read more6/26/2024
🤔
0
Understanding User Preferences in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey and a Mapping Function Proposal
Maryam Hashemi, Ali Darejeh, Francisco Cruz
The increasing complexity of AI systems has led to the growth of the field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), which aims to provide explanations and justifications for the outputs of AI algorithms. While there is considerable demand for XAI, there remains a scarcity of studies aimed at comprehensively understanding the practical distinctions among different methods and effectively aligning each method with users individual needs, and ideally, offer a mapping function which can map each user with its specific needs to a method of explainability. This study endeavors to bridge this gap by conducting a thorough review of extant research in XAI, with a specific focus on Explainable Machine Learning (XML), and a keen eye on user needs. Our main objective is to offer a classification of XAI methods within the realm of XML, categorizing current works into three distinct domains: philosophy, theory, and practice, and providing a critical review for each category. Moreover, our study seeks to facilitate the connection between XAI users and the most suitable methods for them and tailor explanations to meet their specific needs by proposing a mapping function that take to account users and their desired properties and suggest an XAI method to them. This entails an examination of prevalent XAI approaches and an evaluation of their properties. The primary outcome of this study is the formulation of a clear and concise strategy for selecting the optimal XAI method to achieve a given goal, all while delivering personalized explanations tailored to individual users.
Read more6/21/2024