Evaluating LLMs at Evaluating Temporal Generalization
0
⛏️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has highlighted the need for evolving evaluation methodologies that can keep pace with improvements in language comprehension and information processing.
- Traditional static benchmarks fail to capture the continually changing information landscape, leading to a disparity between perceived and actual LLM effectiveness in real-world scenarios.
- The paper examines current LLMs in terms of temporal generalization and bias, revealing various temporal biases in both language likelihood and prognostic prediction.
- The authors propose an evaluation framework called FreshBench for dynamically generating benchmarks from the most recent real-world prognostication prediction.
Plain English Explanation
As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance rapidly, the way we evaluate their performance needs to evolve as well. Traditional benchmarks, which are often static, don't keep up with the constantly changing information that these models are designed to process.
This means that the perceived effectiveness of LLMs may not match their actual performance in real-world situations. The paper looks at how LLMs behave over time, and finds that they can develop biases based on when the information they're trained on was collected. For example, an LLM trained on data from 2020 might make different predictions than one trained on data from 2022, even if they're otherwise similar.
To address this issue, the researchers propose a new evaluation framework called FreshBench. FreshBench uses the most up-to-date real-world data to generate constantly evolving benchmarks for testing LLMs. This helps ensure that the models are being evaluated based on their ability to adapt to changing information, rather than just their performance on static tests.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the temporal generalization and bias of current Large Language Models (LLMs). The researchers find that various temporal biases emerge in both language likelihood and prognostic prediction tasks, indicating that LLMs may not be as temporally robust as previously assumed.
To address this issue, the authors propose FreshBench, an evaluation framework that dynamically generates benchmarks from the most recent real-world prognostication prediction data. This approach aims to capture the continually changing information landscape and better assess the models' adaptability over time.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of FreshBench through experiments on several popular LLMs, revealing significant temporal biases and performance degradation over time. This underscores the need for more robust and dynamic evaluation methodologies that can keep pace with the rapid advancements in language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the limitations of traditional LLM evaluation methodologies. The authors' identification of temporal biases in both language likelihood and prognostic prediction tasks is an important finding that highlights the need for more sophisticated evaluation approaches.
While the FreshBench framework is a promising solution, its long-term viability and scalability across different domains and tasks remain to be seen. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential challenges of implementing such a dynamic evaluation system in practice, such as the computational resources required or the difficulty of maintaining a constantly updated dataset.
Further research is needed to explore other approaches to temporal bias mitigation and to investigate the broader implications of these findings for the development and deployment of LLMs in real-world applications.
Conclusion
This paper underscores the urgent need for evolving evaluation methodologies that can keep pace with the rapid advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs). The identification of temporal biases in both language likelihood and prognostic prediction tasks highlights the limitations of traditional static benchmarks and the disparity between perceived and actual LLM effectiveness.
The authors' proposed FreshBench framework offers a promising approach to dynamically evaluating LLMs, but further research is needed to address the practical challenges of implementation and to explore other strategies for mitigating temporal biases. As the field of language models continues to evolve, it is crucial that evaluation methodologies keep pace to ensure the reliable and responsible development of these powerful technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⛏️
0
Evaluating LLMs at Evaluating Temporal Generalization
Chenghao Zhu, Nuo Chen, Yufei Gao, Yunyi Zhang, Prayag Tiwari, Benyou Wang
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) highlights the urgent need for evolving evaluation methodologies that keep pace with improvements in language comprehension and information processing. However, traditional benchmarks, which are often static, fail to capture the continually changing information landscape, leading to a disparity between the perceived and actual effectiveness of LLMs in ever-changing real-world scenarios. Our study examines temporal generalization, which includes the ability to understand, predict, and generate text relevant to past, present, and future contexts, revealing significant temporal biases in LLMs. We propose an evaluation framework, for dynamically generating benchmarks from recent real-world predictions. Experiments demonstrate that LLMs struggle with temporal generalization, showing performance decline over time. These findings highlight the necessity for improved training and updating processes to enhance adaptability and reduce biases. Our code, dataset and benchmark are available at https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/FreshBench.
Read more7/11/2024
0
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Temporal Event Forecasting
He Chang, Chenchen Ye, Zhulin Tao, Jie Wu, Zhengmao Yang, Yunshan Ma, Xianglin Huang, Tat-Seng Chua
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential in various data mining tasks, such as knowledge question answering, mathematical reasoning, and commonsense reasoning. However, the reasoning capability of LLMs on temporal event forecasting has been under-explored. To systematically investigate their abilities in temporal event forecasting, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LLM-based methods for temporal event forecasting. Due to the lack of a high-quality dataset that involves both graph and textual data, we first construct a benchmark dataset, named MidEast-TE-mini. Based on this dataset, we design a series of baseline methods, characterized by various input formats and retrieval augmented generation(RAG) modules. From extensive experiments, we find that directly integrating raw texts into the input of LLMs does not enhance zero-shot extrapolation performance. In contrast, incorporating raw texts in specific complex events and fine-tuning LLMs significantly improves performance. Moreover, enhanced with retrieval modules, LLM can effectively capture temporal relational patterns hidden in historical events. Meanwhile, issues such as popularity bias and the long-tail problem still persist in LLMs, particularly in the RAG-based method. These findings not only deepen our understanding of LLM-based event forecasting methods but also highlight several promising research directions.We consider that this comprehensive evaluation, along with the identified research opportunities, will significantly contribute to future research on temporal event forecasting through LLMs.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Test of Time: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Temporal Reasoning
Bahare Fatemi, Mehran Kazemi, Anton Tsitsulin, Karishma Malkan, Jinyeong Yim, John Palowitch, Sungyong Seo, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan Perozzi
Large language models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet they remain susceptible to errors, particularly in temporal reasoning tasks involving complex temporal logic. Existing research has explored LLM performance on temporal reasoning using diverse datasets and benchmarks. However, these studies often rely on real-world data that LLMs may have encountered during pre-training or employ anonymization techniques that can inadvertently introduce factual inconsistencies. In this work, we address these limitations by introducing novel synthetic datasets specifically designed to assess LLM temporal reasoning abilities in various scenarios. The diversity of question types across these datasets enables systematic investigation into the impact of the problem structure, size, question type, fact order, and other factors on LLM performance. Our findings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of current LLMs in temporal reasoning tasks. To foster further research in this area, we are open-sourcing the datasets and evaluation framework used in our experiments: https://huggingface.co/datasets/baharef/ToT.
Read more6/14/2024
0
STBench: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models in Spatio-Temporal Analysis
Wenbin Li, Di Yao, Ruibo Zhao, Wenjie Chen, Zijie Xu, Chengxue Luo, Chang Gong, Quanliang Jing, Haining Tan, Jingping Bi
The rapid evolution of large language models (LLMs) holds promise for reforming the methodology of spatio-temporal data mining. However, current works for evaluating the spatio-temporal understanding capability of LLMs are somewhat limited and biased. These works either fail to incorporate the latest language models or only focus on assessing the memorized spatio-temporal knowledge. To address this gap, this paper dissects LLMs' capability of spatio-temporal data into four distinct dimensions: knowledge comprehension, spatio-temporal reasoning, accurate computation, and downstream applications. We curate several natural language question-answer tasks for each category and build the benchmark dataset, namely STBench, containing 13 distinct tasks and over 60,000 QA pairs. Moreover, we have assessed the capabilities of 13 LLMs, such as GPT-4o, Gemma and Mistral. Experimental results reveal that existing LLMs show remarkable performance on knowledge comprehension and spatio-temporal reasoning tasks, with potential for further enhancement on other tasks through in-context learning, chain-of-though prompting, and fine-tuning. The code and datasets of STBench are released on https://github.com/LwbXc/STBench.
Read more6/28/2024