Keypoint-based Progressive Chain-of-Thought Distillation for LLMs
2405.16064
0
0
Abstract
Chain-of-thought distillation is a powerful technique for transferring reasoning abilities from large language models (LLMs) to smaller student models. Previous methods typically require the student to mimic the step-by-step rationale produced by LLMs, often facing the following challenges: (i) Tokens within a rationale vary in significance, and treating them equally may fail to accurately mimic keypoint tokens, leading to reasoning errors. (ii) They usually distill knowledge by consistently predicting all the steps in a rationale, which falls short in distinguishing the learning order of step generation. This diverges from the human cognitive progression of starting with easy tasks and advancing to harder ones, resulting in sub-optimal outcomes. To this end, we propose a unified framework, called KPOD, to address these issues. Specifically, we propose a token weighting module utilizing mask learning to encourage accurate mimicry of keypoint tokens by the student during distillation. Besides, we develop an in-rationale progressive distillation strategy, starting with training the student to generate the final reasoning steps and gradually extending to cover the entire rationale. To accomplish this, a weighted token generation loss is proposed to assess step reasoning difficulty, and a value function is devised to schedule the progressive distillation by considering both step difficulty and question diversity. Extensive experiments on four reasoning benchmarks illustrate our KPOD outperforms previous methods by a large margin.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach called "Keypoint-based Progressive Chain-of-Thought Distillation" for training smaller language models to mimic the chain-of-thought reasoning of larger language models.
- The method leverages "keypoints" - important intermediate steps in the reasoning process - to guide the distillation of the smaller model.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on various language tasks, showing that the smaller distilled models can match or even outperform the original larger models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about a way to take a large, powerful language model and use it to train a smaller, more compact model to reason in a similar way. This is useful because the smaller model can be faster and more efficient, while still capturing the valuable thought processes of the larger model.
The key innovation is the use of "keypoints" - important steps or insights that the larger model generates during its reasoning. By focusing on these keypoints, the smaller model can learn to replicate the overall chain of thought, rather than just trying to mimic the final output.
This relates to the research in "Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Reason Like Large Models" which also looked at distilling reasoning capabilities from large to small models.
The authors show that this keypoint-based approach leads to smaller models that can match or even outperform the original large models on a variety of language tasks. This is an exciting development, as it could enable the use of powerful language AI in more resource-constrained settings, like on mobile devices or in embedded systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a "Keypoint-based Progressive Chain-of-Thought Distillation" (KPCT) method for training smaller language models to mimic the reasoning process of larger models. The key idea is to identify "keypoints" - important intermediate steps in the larger model's chain of thought - and use these as targets for the smaller model to learn.
The distillation process is done progressively, where the smaller model first learns to predict the initial keypoints, then the subsequent ones, and so on. This allows the smaller model to gradually build up its chain-of-thought capabilities.
The authors evaluate KPCT on a range of language tasks, including question answering, common sense reasoning, and symbolic mathematics. They show that the distilled smaller models can match or even outperform the original larger models, while being much more efficient in terms of compute and memory requirements.
This relates to the research in "Learning to Maximize Mutual Information: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Multi-task Math Word Problems" which also explored using intermediate reasoning steps to improve model performance.
The authors also compare KPCT to other distillation approaches, such as QCRD and MINDS, and find that it outperforms them on the evaluated tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the KPCT method, showcasing its effectiveness across a diverse set of language tasks. The authors provide a clear and detailed explanation of the technical approach, making it easy for readers to understand the key concepts.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations or potential issues with the KPCT approach. For example, it would be interesting to understand how the method performs on more open-ended or creative language tasks, where the reasoning process may be less structured.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational and memory requirements of the distillation process itself, which could be an important consideration for real-world deployment of the technique.
This relates to the research in "Sentence-level or Token-level? A Comprehensive Study on Distillation" which explored tradeoffs in different distillation approaches.
Overall, the paper presents a promising approach for efficiently training smaller language models, but further research is needed to fully understand its limitations and potential use cases.
Conclusion
The "Keypoint-based Progressive Chain-of-Thought Distillation" method introduced in this paper offers an exciting way to distill the reasoning capabilities of large language models into smaller, more efficient models. By focusing on the key intermediate steps in the thought process, the authors demonstrate that the smaller models can match or even outperform the original larger models on a variety of language tasks.
This research has important implications for the deployment of powerful language AI in resource-constrained settings, such as on mobile devices or embedded systems. By enabling the use of compact, high-performing models, the KPCT approach could unlock new applications and use cases for language AI technology.
While the paper presents a well-executed study, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and potential issues with the KPCT method. Exploring its performance on more open-ended language tasks and examining the computational requirements of the distillation process itself would be valuable next steps.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the field of language model distillation, and the keypoint-based approach showcased here has the potential to significantly advance the real-world deployment of powerful language AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Beyond Imitation: Learning Key Reasoning Steps from Dual Chain-of-Thoughts in Reasoning Distillation
Chengwei Dai, Kun Li, Wei Zhou, Songlin Hu
0
0
As Large Language Models (LLMs) scale up and gain powerful Chain-of-Thoughts (CoTs) reasoning abilities, practical resource constraints drive efforts to distill these capabilities into more compact Smaller Language Models (SLMs). We find that CoTs consist mainly of simple reasoning forms, with a small proportion ($approx 4.7%$) of key reasoning steps that truly impact conclusions. However, previous distillation methods typically involve supervised fine-tuning student SLMs only on correct CoTs data produced by teacher LLMs, resulting in students struggling to learn the key reasoning steps, instead imitating the teacher's reasoning forms and making errors or omissions on these steps. To address these issues, drawing an analogy to human learning, where analyzing mistakes according to correct solutions often reveals the crucial steps leading to successes or failures, we propose mistaktextbf{E}-textbf{D}riven key reasontextbf{I}ng step distillatextbf{T}ion (textbf{EDIT}), a novel method that further aids SLMs learning key reasoning steps rather than mere simple fine-tuning. Firstly, to expose these crucial steps in CoTs, we design specific prompts to generate dual CoTs data with similar reasoning paths but divergent conclusions. Then, we apply the minimum edit distance algorithm on the dual CoTs data to locate these key steps and optimize the likelihood of these steps. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of EDIT across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmark reasoning datasets. Further analysis shows that EDIT can generate high-quality CoTs with more correct key reasoning steps. Notably, we also explore how different mistake patterns affect performance and find that EDIT benefits more from logical errors than from knowledge or mathematical calculation errors in dual CoTsfootnote{Code can be found at url{https://github.com/C-W-D/EDIT}}.
5/31/2024
Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also Think Step-by-Step
Liunian Harold Li, Jack Hessel, Youngjae Yu, Xiang Ren, Kai-Wei Chang, Yejin Choi
0
0
Chain-of-thought prompting (e.g., Let's think step-by-step) primes large language models to verbalize rationalization for their predictions. While chain-of-thought can lead to dramatic performance gains, benefits appear to emerge only for sufficiently large models (beyond 50B parameters). We show that orders-of-magnitude smaller models (125M -- 1.3B parameters) can still benefit from chain-of-thought prompting. To achieve this, we introduce Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation (SCoTD), a method to train a smaller student model on rationalizations sampled from a significantly larger teacher model. Experiments across several commonsense benchmarks show that: 1) SCoTD enhances the performance of the student model in both supervised and few-shot settings, and especially for challenge sets; 2) sampling many reasoning chains per instance from the teacher is paramount; and 3) after distillation, student chain-of-thoughts are judged by humans as comparable to the teacher, despite orders of magnitude fewer parameters. We test several hypotheses regarding what properties of chain-of-thought samples are important, e.g., diversity vs. teacher likelihood vs. open-endedness. We release our corpus of chain-of-thought samples and code.
4/17/2024
Improve Student's Reasoning Generalizability through Cascading Decomposed CoTs Distillation
Chengwei Dai, Kun Li, Wei Zhou, Songlin Hu
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit enhanced reasoning at larger scales, driving efforts to distill these capabilities into smaller models via teacher-student learning. Previous works simply fine-tune student models on teachers' generated Chain-of-Thoughts (CoTs) data. Although these methods enhance in-domain (IND) reasoning performance, they struggle to generalize to out-of-domain (OOD) tasks. We believe that the widespread spurious correlations between questions and answers may lead the model to preset a specific answer which restricts the diversity and generalizability of its reasoning process. In this paper, we propose Cascading Decomposed CoTs Distillation (CasCoD) to address these issues by decomposing the traditional single-step learning process into two cascaded learning steps. Specifically, by restructuring the training objectives -- removing the answer from outputs and concatenating the question with the rationale as input -- CasCoD's two-step learning process ensures that students focus on learning rationales without interference from the preset answers, thus improving reasoning generalizability. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of CasCoD on both IND and OOD benchmark reasoning datasets. Code can be found at https://github.com/C-W-D/CasCoD.
5/31/2024
Multi-Stage Balanced Distillation: Addressing Long-Tail Challenges in Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation
Yuhang Zhou, Jing Zhu, Paiheng Xu, Xiaoyu Liu, Xiyao Wang, Danai Koutra, Wei Ai, Furong Huang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced various natural language processing tasks, but deploying them remains computationally expensive. Knowledge distillation (KD) is a promising solution, enabling the transfer of capabilities from larger teacher LLMs to more compact student models. Particularly, sequence-level KD, which distills rationale-based reasoning processes instead of merely final outcomes, shows great potential in enhancing students' reasoning capabilities. However, current methods struggle with sequence level KD under long-tailed data distributions, adversely affecting generalization on sparsely represented domains. We introduce the Multi-Stage Balanced Distillation (BalDistill) framework, which iteratively balances training data within a fixed computational budget. By dynamically selecting representative head domain examples and synthesizing tail domain examples, BalDistill achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse long-tailed datasets, enhancing both the efficiency and efficacy of the distilled models.
6/21/2024