Sentence-Level or Token-Level? A Comprehensive Study on Knowledge Distillation
2404.14827
0
0
💬
Abstract
Knowledge distillation, transferring knowledge from a teacher model to a student model, has emerged as a powerful technique in neural machine translation for compressing models or simplifying training targets. Knowledge distillation encompasses two primary methods: sentence-level distillation and token-level distillation. In sentence-level distillation, the student model is trained to align with the output of the teacher model, which can alleviate the training difficulty and give student model a comprehensive understanding of global structure. Differently, token-level distillation requires the student model to learn the output distribution of the teacher model, facilitating a more fine-grained transfer of knowledge. Studies have revealed divergent performances between sentence-level and token-level distillation across different scenarios, leading to the confusion on the empirical selection of knowledge distillation methods. In this study, we argue that token-level distillation, with its more complex objective (i.e., distribution), is better suited for simple'' scenarios, while sentence-level distillation excels in complex'' scenarios. To substantiate our hypothesis, we systematically analyze the performance of distillation methods by varying the model size of student models, the complexity of text, and the difficulty of decoding procedure. While our experimental results validate our hypothesis, defining the complexity level of a given scenario remains a challenging task. So we further introduce a novel hybrid method that combines token-level and sentence-level distillation through a gating mechanism, aiming to leverage the advantages of both individual methods. Experiments demonstrate that the hybrid method surpasses the performance of token-level or sentence-level distillation methods and the previous works by a margin, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid method.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of knowledge distillation, a technique for transferring knowledge from a "teacher" model to a smaller "student" model, in the context of neural machine translation.
- The paper compares two main approaches to knowledge distillation: sentence-level distillation and token-level distillation.
- The authors hypothesize that token-level distillation works better in "simple" scenarios, while sentence-level distillation is more effective in "complex" scenarios.
- To test this hypothesis, the authors analyze the performance of the distillation methods under different conditions, such as varying student model size, text complexity, and decoding difficulty.
- The paper also introduces a novel "hybrid" method that combines the strengths of both sentence-level and token-level distillation.
Plain English Explanation
Knowledge distillation is a technique used in machine learning to transfer knowledge from a larger, more complex "teacher" model to a smaller, simpler "student" model. This can be useful for compressing models or simplifying training, which can be particularly important in areas like neural machine translation.
The paper discusses two main approaches to knowledge distillation:
- Sentence-level distillation: The student model is trained to match the overall output of the teacher model, which can help the student model understand the "big picture" of the task.
- Token-level distillation: The student model is trained to match the teacher model's output distribution at the individual token level, which can lead to a more fine-grained transfer of knowledge.
The authors hypothesize that token-level distillation works better in "simple" scenarios, while sentence-level distillation is more effective in "complex" scenarios. For example, in simpler tasks, the student model may benefit more from the detailed information provided by token-level distillation. In more complex tasks, the "big picture" understanding provided by sentence-level distillation may be more valuable.
To test this idea, the authors analyze the performance of the distillation methods under different conditions, such as varying student model size, text complexity, and decoding difficulty. They also introduce a novel "hybrid" method that combines the strengths of both sentence-level and token-level distillation, using a gating mechanism to determine the appropriate approach for a given scenario.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the use of knowledge distillation in neural machine translation, where a "teacher" model is used to train a smaller "student" model. The authors compare two main approaches to knowledge distillation:
-
Sentence-level distillation: In this method, the student model is trained to align its output with the output of the teacher model, which can help the student model develop a comprehensive understanding of the global structure of the task.
-
Token-level distillation: This method requires the student model to learn the output distribution of the teacher model at the individual token level, facilitating a more fine-grained transfer of knowledge.
The authors hypothesize that the performance of these two distillation methods may vary depending on the complexity of the scenario. Specifically, they propose that token-level distillation may be more suitable for "simple" scenarios, while sentence-level distillation may excel in "complex" scenarios.
To test this hypothesis, the authors design experiments that vary the size of the student model, the complexity of the input text, and the difficulty of the decoding procedure. The results of these experiments validate the authors' hypothesis, suggesting that the choice of distillation method should be tailored to the specific characteristics of the task at hand.
Additionally, the paper introduces a "hybrid" distillation method that combines the sentence-level and token-level approaches. This hybrid method uses a gating mechanism to determine the appropriate distillation approach for a given scenario, with the goal of leveraging the strengths of both individual methods. The experimental results demonstrate that the hybrid method outperforms the standalone sentence-level and token-level distillation methods, as well as previous work in the field.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and well-designed study on the use of knowledge distillation in neural machine translation. The authors' hypothesis about the suitability of different distillation methods for simple versus complex scenarios is an interesting and plausible proposition, and their systematic experiments provide empirical support for this idea.
However, one limitation of the study is the challenge in defining the "complexity" of a given scenario. The authors acknowledge this difficulty and suggest that further research is needed to establish clear criteria for determining the complexity level of a task. Without a more objective way to assess complexity, the practical application of the authors' recommendations may be limited.
Additionally, the paper focuses on neural machine translation, and it would be valuable to explore the generalizability of the authors' findings to other domains, such as natural language processing or computer vision. Expanding the scope of the research could further validate the authors' hypothesis and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of different knowledge distillation approaches.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of knowledge distillation in neural machine translation. The authors' hypothesis that token-level and sentence-level distillation methods may be better suited for different levels of scenario complexity is a valuable insight, and their experimental results provide empirical support for this idea.
The introduction of the hybrid distillation method, which combines the strengths of both individual approaches, is also a promising development that could help researchers and practitioners select the most appropriate knowledge distillation technique for their specific needs.
While the paper acknowledges the challenge of defining scenario complexity, the overall findings have the potential to inform the design of more effective and efficient machine translation models, with implications for a wide range of natural language processing applications. The paper's insights may also inspire further research into the nuances of knowledge distillation and how to best leverage this powerful technique across diverse machine learning domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Multi-Stage Balanced Distillation: Addressing Long-Tail Challenges in Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation
Yuhang Zhou, Jing Zhu, Paiheng Xu, Xiaoyu Liu, Xiyao Wang, Danai Koutra, Wei Ai, Furong Huang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced various natural language processing tasks, but deploying them remains computationally expensive. Knowledge distillation (KD) is a promising solution, enabling the transfer of capabilities from larger teacher LLMs to more compact student models. Particularly, sequence-level KD, which distills rationale-based reasoning processes instead of merely final outcomes, shows great potential in enhancing students' reasoning capabilities. However, current methods struggle with sequence level KD under long-tailed data distributions, adversely affecting generalization on sparsely represented domains. We introduce the Multi-Stage Balanced Distillation (BalDistill) framework, which iteratively balances training data within a fixed computational budget. By dynamically selecting representative head domain examples and synthesizing tail domain examples, BalDistill achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse long-tailed datasets, enhancing both the efficiency and efficacy of the distilled models.
6/21/2024
Knowledge Distillation of LLM for Automatic Scoring of Science Education Assessments
Ehsan Latif, Luyang Fang, Ping Ma, Xiaoming Zhai
0
0
This study proposes a method for knowledge distillation (KD) of fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) into smaller, more efficient, and accurate neural networks. We specifically target the challenge of deploying these models on resource-constrained devices. Our methodology involves training the smaller student model (Neural Network) using the prediction probabilities (as soft labels) of the LLM, which serves as a teacher model. This is achieved through a specialized loss function tailored to learn from the LLM's output probabilities, ensuring that the student model closely mimics the teacher's performance. To validate the performance of the KD approach, we utilized a large dataset, 7T, containing 6,684 student-written responses to science questions and three mathematical reasoning datasets with student-written responses graded by human experts. We compared accuracy with state-of-the-art (SOTA) distilled models, TinyBERT, and artificial neural network (ANN) models. Results have shown that the KD approach has 3% and 2% higher scoring accuracy than ANN and TinyBERT, respectively, and comparable accuracy to the teacher model. Furthermore, the student model size is 0.03M, 4,000 times smaller in parameters and x10 faster in inferencing than the teacher model and TinyBERT, respectively. The significance of this research lies in its potential to make advanced AI technologies accessible in typical educational settings, particularly for automatic scoring.
6/13/2024
🧠
Improving Neural Topic Models with Wasserstein Knowledge Distillation
Suman Adhya, Debarshi Kumar Sanyal
0
0
Topic modeling is a dominant method for exploring document collections on the web and in digital libraries. Recent approaches to topic modeling use pretrained contextualized language models and variational autoencoders. However, large neural topic models have a considerable memory footprint. In this paper, we propose a knowledge distillation framework to compress a contextualized topic model without loss in topic quality. In particular, the proposed distillation objective is to minimize the cross-entropy of the soft labels produced by the teacher and the student models, as well as to minimize the squared 2-Wasserstein distance between the latent distributions learned by the two models. Experiments on two publicly available datasets show that the student trained with knowledge distillation achieves topic coherence much higher than that of the original student model, and even surpasses the teacher while containing far fewer parameters than the teacher's. The distilled model also outperforms several other competitive topic models on topic coherence.
6/21/2024
🎯
Tailoring Instructions to Student's Learning Levels Boosts Knowledge Distillation
Yuxin Ren, Zihan Zhong, Xingjian Shi, Yi Zhu, Chun Yuan, Mu Li
0
0
It has been commonly observed that a teacher model with superior performance does not necessarily result in a stronger student, highlighting a discrepancy between current teacher training practices and effective knowledge transfer. In order to enhance the guidance of the teacher training process, we introduce the concept of distillation influence to determine the impact of distillation from each training sample on the student's generalization ability. In this paper, we propose Learning Good Teacher Matters (LGTM), an efficient training technique for incorporating distillation influence into the teacher's learning process. By prioritizing samples that are likely to enhance the student's generalization ability, our LGTM outperforms 10 common knowledge distillation baselines on 6 text classification tasks in the GLUE benchmark.
5/16/2024