Trust Your $nabla$: Gradient-based Intervention Targeting for Causal Discovery
0
🤔
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Inferring causal structure from data is a crucial task in science, but observational data alone is often insufficient to uniquely identify a system's causal structure.
- Conducting interventions (experiments) can improve identifiability, but obtaining such samples is usually challenging and expensive.
- This work proposes a novel method, Gradient-based Intervention Targeting (GIT), that uses a gradient-based causal discovery framework to guide the selection of the most informative intervention targets, minimizing the number of required interventions.
Plain English Explanation
Understanding how different factors influence each other is essential for making accurate predictions and informed decisions in many scientific fields. This process of discovering the causal structure underlying a system is known as causal inference.
However, when scientists rely solely on observational data (data collected without actively intervening in the system), there are often multiple possible causal structures that could explain the observed patterns. To resolve this ambiguity, scientists may need to conduct experiments, where they actively intervene in the system and measure the resulting changes.
Unfortunately, designing and carrying out experiments can be both challenging and expensive. The authors of this paper recognized this problem and sought to develop a more efficient approach to causal discovery.
Their proposed method, called Gradient-based Intervention Targeting (GIT), utilizes a gradient-based causal discovery framework to identify the most informative intervention targets. This allows researchers to obtain the necessary information to infer the causal structure of a system using fewer experiments, saving time and resources.
The authors tested GIT on both simulated and real-world datasets, and found that it performed as well as or better than other leading methods, particularly in situations with limited data.
Technical Explanation
The Gradient-based Intervention Targeting (GIT) method proposed in this work leverages a gradient-based causal discovery framework to guide the selection of intervention targets. This framework estimates the causal structure of a system by analyzing the gradients of a neural network trained to predict the relationships between variables.
The key innovation of GIT is that it "trusts" the gradient estimator provided by this causal discovery framework to determine the most informative intervention targets. By focusing interventions on the variables that are expected to yield the most information about the causal structure, GIT can minimize the number of experiments required to accurately infer the system's causal structure.
The authors conducted extensive experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets to evaluate the performance of GIT. They compared it to several competitive baselines and found that GIT performed on par or better, particularly in low-data regimes where other methods struggle.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations of their approach, including the reliance on the accuracy of the gradient estimator and the potential for the intervention targeting strategy to get stuck in local optima. Additionally, the performance of GIT may be sensitive to the specific neural network architecture and hyperparameters used in the causal discovery framework.
The authors also note that their experiments focused on relatively small-scale systems, and it remains to be seen how well GIT would scale to larger, more complex datasets. Further research may be needed to address these limitations and explore the broader applicability of the GIT method.
Conclusion
The Gradient-based Intervention Targeting (GIT) method proposed in this work represents an innovative approach to the challenging problem of causal discovery. By leveraging a gradient-based causal discovery framework to guide the selection of intervention targets, GIT can infer the causal structure of a system using fewer experiments compared to other leading methods.
The authors' promising results, particularly in low-data regimes, suggest that GIT could have significant practical implications for a wide range of scientific disciplines, from biology to economics, where efficient causal discovery is crucial for advancing our understanding of complex systems and informing effective decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
0
Trust Your $nabla$: Gradient-based Intervention Targeting for Causal Discovery
Mateusz Olko, Micha{l} Zajk{a}c, Aleksandra Nowak, Nino Scherrer, Yashas Annadani, Stefan Bauer, {L}ukasz Kuci'nski, Piotr Mi{l}o's
Inferring causal structure from data is a challenging task of fundamental importance in science. Observational data are often insufficient to identify a system's causal structure uniquely. While conducting interventions (i.e., experiments) can improve the identifiability, such samples are usually challenging and expensive to obtain. Hence, experimental design approaches for causal discovery aim to minimize the number of interventions by estimating the most informative intervention target. In this work, we propose a novel Gradient-based Intervention Targeting method, abbreviated GIT, that 'trusts' the gradient estimator of a gradient-based causal discovery framework to provide signals for the intervention acquisition function. We provide extensive experiments in simulated and real-world datasets and demonstrate that GIT performs on par with competitive baselines, surpassing them in the low-data regime.
Read more4/4/2024
0
Bayesian Intervention Optimization for Causal Discovery
Yuxuan Wang, Mingzhou Liu, Xinwei Sun, Wei Wang, Yizhou Wang
Causal discovery is crucial for understanding complex systems and informing decisions. While observational data can uncover causal relationships under certain assumptions, it often falls short, making active interventions necessary. Current methods, such as Bayesian and graph-theoretical approaches, do not prioritize decision-making and often rely on ideal conditions or information gain, which is not directly related to hypothesis testing. We propose a novel Bayesian optimization-based method inspired by Bayes factors that aims to maximize the probability of obtaining decisive and correct evidence. Our approach uses observational data to estimate causal models under different hypotheses, evaluates potential interventions pre-experimentally, and iteratively updates priors to refine interventions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through various experiments. Our contributions provide a robust framework for efficient causal discovery through active interventions, enhancing the practical application of theoretical advancements.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Lai Wei, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi
Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs by leveraging observational, interventional data, or their combination. The majority of existing causal discovery methods are developed assuming infinite interventional data. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning, inspired by pure exploration in bandit problems. A graph separating system, consisting of interventions that cut every edge of the graph at least once, is sufficient for learning causal graphs when infinite interventional data is available, even in the worst case. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system via allocation matching and learns the causal graph based on sampling history. Given any desired confidence value, the algorithm determines a termination condition and runs until it is met. We analyze the algorithm to establish a problem-dependent upper bound on the expected number of required interventional samples. Our proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in simulations across various randomly generated causal graphs. It achieves higher accuracy, measured by the structural hamming distance (SHD) between the learned causal graph and the ground truth, with significantly fewer samples.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Learning Flexible Time-windowed Granger Causality Integrating Heterogeneous Interventional Time Series Data
Ziyi Zhang, Shaogang Ren, Xiaoning Qian, Nick Duffield
Granger causality, commonly used for inferring causal structures from time series data, has been adopted in widespread applications across various fields due to its intuitive explainability and high compatibility with emerging deep neural network prediction models. To alleviate challenges in better deciphering causal structures unambiguously from time series, the use of interventional data has become a practical approach. However, existing methods have yet to be explored in the context of imperfect interventions with unknown targets, which are more common and often more beneficial in a wide range of real-world applications. Additionally, the identifiability issues of Granger causality with unknown interventional targets in complex network models remain unsolved. Our work presents a theoretically-grounded method that infers Granger causal structure and identifies unknown targets by leveraging heterogeneous interventional time series data. We further illustrate that learning Granger causal structure and recovering interventional targets can mutually promote each other. Comparative experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms several robust baseline methods in learning Granger causal structure from interventional time series data.
Read more6/18/2024