Learning text-to-video retrieval from image captioning

Read original: arXiv:2404.17498 - Published 4/29/2024 by Lucas Ventura, Cordelia Schmid, Gul Varol
Total Score

0

🖼️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a protocol for training text-to-video retrieval models using unlabeled videos and labeled images.
  • The key ideas are:
    1. Leveraging existing image-text models like CLIP to provide an initial backbone for video understanding.
    2. Using image captioning models to automatically annotate video frames, providing supervision signals for text-to-video training.
  • The authors show this simple approach outperforms CLIP's zero-shot text-to-video retrieval on several benchmark datasets.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a way to train AI models to find videos that match text queries, without having to manually label the videos first. This is useful because labeling videos is time-consuming and expensive, while labeling images is much easier.

The key idea is to use existing AI models that are good at understanding images and their captions. These "image experts" can be used in two ways:

  1. As a starting point or "backbone" for the video understanding model. CLIP is an example of a powerful image-text model that can provide a good initial set of features.

  2. To automatically generate captions for the video frames. By finding the captions that best match each frame, the model gets a sense of what the video content is about, without requiring manual labeling.

The researchers show that by using this automatic captioning approach, they can train a text-to-video retrieval model that outperforms the zero-shot CLIP baseline on several standard datasets, like ActivityNet, MSR-VTT, and MSVD. This is an efficient way to adapt the video features to the target domain without any manual annotation effort.

Technical Explanation

The core of the proposed protocol is to leverage existing image-text models as "image experts" to provide supervision signals for training text-to-video retrieval. Specifically, the authors use two types of image experts:

  1. A text-to-image retrieval model, like CLIP, to provide an initial set of video features and representations.
  2. Image captioning models to automatically generate captions for video frames, which can then be used to train the text-to-video retrieval model.

During training, the model samples captions from multiple video frames that best match the visual content, and performs a temporal pooling over the frame representations by scoring each frame's relevance to the captions.

Through extensive experiments, the authors demonstrate that this simple framework is effective, outperforming the CLIP zero-shot baseline on text-to-video retrieval across multiple standard datasets. The key advantage is that the model can adapt the video features to the target domain at no manual annotation cost, leveraging the readily available image-text supervision.

Critical Analysis

The proposed approach is clever and effective, but a few potential limitations are worth noting:

  1. The performance is still dependent on the quality of the initial "image expert" models used (CLIP and the image captioners). If these models have biases or blindspots, those could carry over to the final text-to-video retrieval system.
  2. The authors only evaluate on standard benchmark datasets, which may not fully reflect real-world video retrieval scenarios. Further testing on more diverse and challenging video data would be valuable.
  3. The paper does not explicitly address potential privacy or ethical concerns around automatically captioning user-generated videos without consent. These issues would need to be carefully considered for any real-world deployment.

Overall, this is a promising step toward more efficient video understanding, but continued research is needed to address these types of limitations and ensure the technology is developed responsibly.

Conclusion

This paper presents a simple yet effective protocol for training text-to-video retrieval models using only unlabeled videos and labeled images. By leveraging existing "image expert" models, the approach can adapt video features to the target domain without any manual annotation effort, outperforming strong zero-shot baselines.

The key insight is that automatic video frame captioning can provide valuable supervision signals for text-to-video training, bridging the gap between image-text and video-text understanding. This work demonstrates the power of transfer learning and the continued progress of multimodal AI models in advancing video-related tasks.

While the results are encouraging, further research is needed to address potential limitations and ensure the ethical development of such technologies. Nevertheless, this paper makes an important contribution toward more efficient and scalable video understanding.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Total Score

0

Learning text-to-video retrieval from image captioning

Lucas Ventura, Cordelia Schmid, Gul Varol

We describe a protocol to study text-to-video retrieval training with unlabeled videos, where we assume (i) no access to labels for any videos, i.e., no access to the set of ground-truth captions, but (ii) access to labeled images in the form of text. Using image expert models is a realistic scenario given that annotating images is cheaper therefore scalable, in contrast to expensive video labeling schemes. Recently, zero-shot image experts such as CLIP have established a new strong baseline for video understanding tasks. In this paper, we make use of this progress and instantiate the image experts from two types of models: a text-to-image retrieval model to provide an initial backbone, and image captioning models to provide supervision signal into unlabeled videos. We show that automatically labeling video frames with image captioning allows text-to-video retrieval training. This process adapts the features to the target domain at no manual annotation cost, consequently outperforming the strong zero-shot CLIP baseline. During training, we sample captions from multiple video frames that best match the visual content, and perform a temporal pooling over frame representations by scoring frames according to their relevance to each caption. We conduct extensive ablations to provide insights and demonstrate the effectiveness of this simple framework by outperforming the CLIP zero-shot baselines on text-to-video retrieval on three standard datasets, namely ActivityNet, MSR-VTT, and MSVD.

Read more

4/29/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Retrieval Enhanced Zero-Shot Video Captioning

Yunchuan Ma, Laiyun Qing, Guorong Li, Yuankai Qi, Quan Z. Sheng, Qingming Huang

Despite the significant progress of fully-supervised video captioning, zero-shot methods remain much less explored. In this paper, we propose to take advantage of existing pre-trained large-scale vision and language models to directly generate captions with test time adaptation. Specifically, we bridge video and text using three key models: a general video understanding model XCLIP, a general image understanding model CLIP, and a text generation model GPT-2, due to their source-code availability. The main challenge is how to enable the text generation model to be sufficiently aware of the content in a given video so as to generate corresponding captions. To address this problem, we propose using learnable tokens as a communication medium between frozen GPT-2 and frozen XCLIP as well as frozen CLIP. Differing from the conventional way to train these tokens with training data, we update these tokens with pseudo-targets of the inference data under several carefully crafted loss functions which enable the tokens to absorb video information catered for GPT-2. This procedure can be done in just a few iterations (we use 16 iterations in the experiments) and does not require ground truth data. Extensive experimental results on three widely used datasets, MSR-VTT, MSVD, and VATEX, show 4% to 20% improvements in terms of the main metric CIDEr compared to the existing state-of-the-art methods.

Read more

5/14/2024

Distilling Vision-Language Models on Millions of Videos
Total Score

0

Distilling Vision-Language Models on Millions of Videos

Yue Zhao, Long Zhao, Xingyi Zhou, Jialin Wu, Chun-Te Chu, Hui Miao, Florian Schroff, Hartwig Adam, Ting Liu, Boqing Gong, Philipp Krahenbuhl, Liangzhe Yuan

The recent advance in vision-language models is largely attributed to the abundance of image-text data. We aim to replicate this success for video-language models, but there simply is not enough human-curated video-text data available. We thus resort to fine-tuning a video-language model from a strong image-language baseline with synthesized instructional data. The resulting video model by video-instruction-tuning (VIIT) is then used to auto-label millions of videos to generate high-quality captions. We show the adapted video-language model performs well on a wide range of video-language benchmarks. For instance, it surpasses the best prior result on open-ended NExT-QA by 2.8%. Besides, our model generates detailed descriptions for previously unseen videos, which provide better textual supervision than existing methods. Experiments show that a video-language dual-encoder model contrastively trained on these auto-generated captions is 3.8% better than the strongest baseline that also leverages vision-language models. Our best model outperforms state-of-the-art methods on MSR-VTT zero-shot text-to-video retrieval by 6%. As a side product, we generate the largest video caption dataset to date.

Read more

4/17/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Video Editing for Video Retrieval

Bin Zhu, Kevin Flanagan, Adriano Fragomeni, Michael Wray, Dima Damen

Though pre-training vision-language models have demonstrated significant benefits in boosting video-text retrieval performance from large-scale web videos, fine-tuning still plays a critical role with manually annotated clips with start and end times, which requires considerable human effort. To address this issue, we explore an alternative cheaper source of annotations, single timestamps, for video-text retrieval. We initialise clips from timestamps in a heuristic way to warm up a retrieval model. Then a video clip editing method is proposed to refine the initial rough boundaries to improve retrieval performance. A student-teacher network is introduced for video clip editing. The teacher model is employed to edit the clips in the training set whereas the student model trains on the edited clips. The teacher weights are updated from the student's after the student's performance increases. Our method is model agnostic and applicable to any retrieval models. We conduct experiments based on three state-of-the-art retrieval models, COOT, VideoCLIP and CLIP4Clip. Experiments conducted on three video retrieval datasets, YouCook2, DiDeMo and ActivityNet-Captions show that our edited clips consistently improve retrieval performance over initial clips across all the three retrieval models.

Read more

9/10/2024