Learning to Recover from Plan Execution Errors during Robot Manipulation: A Neuro-symbolic Approach

Read original: arXiv:2405.18948 - Published 5/30/2024 by Namasivayam Kalithasan, Arnav Tuli, Vishal Bindal, Himanshu Gaurav Singh, Parag Singla, Rohan Paul
Total Score

0

Learning to Recover from Plan Execution Errors during Robot Manipulation: A Neuro-symbolic Approach

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a neuro-symbolic approach for learning to recover from plan execution errors during robot manipulation tasks.
  • The proposed method combines deep learning and symbolic reasoning to enable robots to detect and correct errors that occur during the execution of planned manipulation tasks.
  • The approach aims to improve the reliability and robustness of robot manipulation by equipping robots with the ability to dynamically adapt to unexpected situations.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a new way to help robots handle mistakes that can happen when they are performing tasks. Sometimes, even with careful planning, things can go wrong when a robot is trying to manipulate or interact with objects. This could be things like an object slipping out of the robot's grasp or the robot knocking something over.

The researchers developed a system that combines deep learning (a type of artificial intelligence that can recognize patterns in data) and symbolic reasoning (a way of representing and reasoning about knowledge using logical rules). This allows the robot to detect when something has gone wrong during a task and then figure out how to recover and continue the task successfully.

The goal is to make robots more reliable and adaptable, so they can handle unexpected situations that come up during real-world tasks, rather than just blindly following a pre-planned sequence of actions. This could be useful in a variety of applications, such as manufacturing, household chores, or even space exploration.

Technical Explanation

The proposed approach combines deep learning-based perception to detect errors during plan execution with symbolic reasoning to determine the appropriate recovery actions.

The system first uses deep neural networks to monitor the robot's state and actions during task execution. If an error is detected, such as an object slipping or being knocked over, the symbolic reasoning module is triggered to diagnose the problem and generate a recovery plan. This recovery plan is then executed by the robot to correct the error and continue the task.

The key innovations of this work include:

  1. A neuro-symbolic architecture that tightly integrates deep learning and symbolic reasoning for robust error detection and recovery.
  2. Novel techniques for learning manipulation skills through "chain-of-thought" demonstrations to enable flexible error recovery.
  3. Automated discovery of symbolic laws governing skill acquisition to improve the generalization of the recovery capabilities.

The authors evaluate their approach on a range of simulated and real-world robot manipulation tasks, demonstrating significant improvements in task success rates compared to baseline methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for improving the reliability of robot manipulation, but it also has some limitations and open questions:

  • The symbolic reasoning module relies on a pre-defined set of rules and recovery strategies, which may not be able to handle all possible error scenarios. Further research is needed to automatically discover and refine these rules to expand the system's capabilities.
  • The approach assumes that the robot has access to accurate state information during task execution, which may not always be the case in real-world settings with noisy sensors and partial observability. Addressing this challenge could improve the system's robustness.
  • The evaluation is mostly limited to simulated environments and relatively simple manipulation tasks. Demonstrating the scalability and effectiveness of the approach on more complex, real-world tasks would further validate its practical utility.

Overall, the neuro-symbolic approach presented in this paper represents an important step towards more reliable and adaptable robot manipulation capabilities. Continued research in this direction could lead to significant advancements in the field of robotics and automation.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel neuro-symbolic approach for enabling robots to learn to recover from plan execution errors during manipulation tasks. By combining deep learning-based perception and symbolic reasoning, the proposed system can detect errors, diagnose the underlying issues, and generate appropriate recovery strategies on-the-fly.

The key contributions of this work include the integration of deep learning and symbolic reasoning, novel techniques for learning flexible manipulation skills, and the automated discovery of symbolic laws governing skill acquisition. Evaluated on a range of simulated and real-world tasks, the approach demonstrates significant improvements in task success rates compared to baseline methods.

While the paper presents a promising step forward, further research is needed to address the remaining challenges, such as expanding the symbolic reasoning capabilities and improving the system's robustness to real-world sensing uncertainties. Nonetheless, this work represents an important advancement towards more reliable and adaptable robot manipulation, with potential applications in various domains, from manufacturing to household assistance and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Learning to Recover from Plan Execution Errors during Robot Manipulation: A Neuro-symbolic Approach
Total Score

0

Learning to Recover from Plan Execution Errors during Robot Manipulation: A Neuro-symbolic Approach

Namasivayam Kalithasan, Arnav Tuli, Vishal Bindal, Himanshu Gaurav Singh, Parag Singla, Rohan Paul

Automatically detecting and recovering from failures is an important but challenging problem for autonomous robots. Most of the recent work on learning to plan from demonstrations lacks the ability to detect and recover from errors in the absence of an explicit state representation and/or a (sub-) goal check function. We propose an approach (blending learning with symbolic search) for automated error discovery and recovery, without needing annotated data of failures. Central to our approach is a neuro-symbolic state representation, in the form of dense scene graph, structured based on the objects present within the environment. This enables efficient learning of the transition function and a discriminator that not only identifies failures but also localizes them facilitating fast re-planning via computation of heuristic distance function. We also present an anytime version of our algorithm, where instead of recovering to the last correct state, we search for a sub-goal in the original plan minimizing the total distance to the goal given a re-planning budget. Experiments on a physics simulator with a variety of simulated failures show the effectiveness of our approach compared to existing baselines, both in terms of efficiency as well as accuracy of our recovery mechanism.

Read more

5/30/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

Language-Augmented Symbolic Planner for Open-World Task Planning

Guanqi Chen, Lei Yang, Ruixing Jia, Zhe Hu, Yizhou Chen, Wei Zhang, Wenping Wang, Jia Pan

Enabling robotic agents to perform complex long-horizon tasks has been a long-standing goal in robotics and artificial intelligence (AI). Despite the potential shown by large language models (LLMs), their planning capabilities remain limited to short-horizon tasks and they are unable to replace the symbolic planning approach. Symbolic planners, on the other hand, may encounter execution errors due to their common assumption of complete domain knowledge which is hard to manually prepare for an open-world setting. In this paper, we introduce a Language-Augmented Symbolic Planner (LASP) that integrates pre-trained LLMs to enable conventional symbolic planners to operate in an open-world environment where only incomplete knowledge of action preconditions, objects, and properties is initially available. In case of execution errors, LASP can utilize the LLM to diagnose the cause of the error based on the observation and interact with the environment to incrementally build up its knowledge base necessary for accomplishing the given tasks. Experiments demonstrate that LASP is proficient in solving planning problems in the open-world setting, performing well even in situations where there are multiple gaps in the knowledge.

Read more

7/16/2024

💬

Total Score

0

A Framework for Neurosymbolic Robot Action Planning using Large Language Models

Alessio Capitanelli, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni

Symbolic task planning is a widely used approach to enforce robot autonomy due to its ease of understanding and deployment in robot architectures. However, techniques for symbolic task planning are difficult to scale in real-world, human-robot collaboration scenarios because of the poor performance in complex planning domains or when frequent re-planning is needed. We present a framework, Teriyaki, specifically aimed at bridging the gap between symbolic task planning and machine learning approaches. The rationale is training Large Language Models (LLMs), namely GPT-3, into a neurosymbolic task planner compatible with the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), and then leveraging its generative capabilities to overcome a number of limitations inherent to symbolic task planners. Potential benefits include (i) a better scalability in so far as the planning domain complexity increases, since LLMs' response time linearly scales with the combined length of the input and the output, and (ii) the ability to synthesize a plan action-by-action instead of end-to-end, making each action available for execution as soon as it is generated instead of waiting for the whole plan to be available, which in turn enables concurrent planning and execution. Recently, significant efforts have been devoted by the research community to evaluate the cognitive capabilities of LLMs, with alternate successes. Instead, with Teriyaki we aim to provide an overall planning performance comparable to traditional planners in specific planning domains, while leveraging LLMs capabilities to build a look-ahead predictive planning model. Preliminary results in selected domains show that our method can: (i) solve 95.5% of problems in a test data set of 1,000 samples; (ii) produce plans up to 13.5% shorter than a traditional symbolic planner; (iii) reduce average overall waiting times for a plan availability by up to 61.4%

Read more

6/5/2024

NSP: A Neuro-Symbolic Natural Language Navigational Planner
Total Score

0

NSP: A Neuro-Symbolic Natural Language Navigational Planner

William English, Dominic Simon, Sumit Jha, Rickard Ewetz

Path planners that can interpret free-form natural language instructions hold promise to automate a wide range of robotics applications. These planners simplify user interactions and enable intuitive control over complex semi-autonomous systems. While existing symbolic approaches offer guarantees on the correctness and efficiency, they struggle to parse free-form natural language inputs. Conversely, neural approaches based on pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) can manage natural language inputs but lack performance guarantees. In this paper, we propose a neuro-symbolic framework for path planning from natural language inputs called NSP. The framework leverages the neural reasoning abilities of LLMs to i) craft symbolic representations of the environment and ii) a symbolic path planning algorithm. Next, a solution to the path planning problem is obtained by executing the algorithm on the environment representation. The framework uses a feedback loop from the symbolic execution environment to the neural generation process to self-correct syntax errors and satisfy execution time constraints. We evaluate our neuro-symbolic approach using a benchmark suite with 1500 path-planning problems. The experimental evaluation shows that our neuro-symbolic approach produces 90.1% valid paths that are on average 19-77% shorter than state-of-the-art neural approaches.

Read more

9/17/2024