LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
6
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces LegalBench-RAG, a new benchmark for evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems in the legal domain.
- Covers the benchmark's dataset, tasks, and evaluation metrics.
- Presents baseline results using state-of-the-art RAG models.
Plain English Explanation
This paper presents a new benchmark called LegalBench-RAG that is designed to measure the performance of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems in the legal domain.
RAG systems are AI models that can combine information from a knowledge base (like a database of legal documents) with language generation to produce more informed and relevant text. The LegalBench-RAG benchmark includes a dataset of legal documents and tasks that test a RAG system's ability to generate accurate and coherent legal summaries, analyses, and predictions.
The paper describes the benchmark's dataset, the specific tasks it includes, and the metrics used to evaluate a model's performance. It then presents the results of running some of the latest RAG models on this benchmark, providing a baseline for future research and development in this area.
Technical Explanation
The LegalBench-RAG dataset consists of a large corpus of legal documents, including cases, statutes, and other legal materials. The benchmark defines several tasks that test a model's ability to perform key legal reasoning and generation abilities, such as:
- Generating a concise summary of a legal case
- Analyzing the key legal issues and arguments in a document
- Predicting the outcome of a case based on the facts and legal precedents
The paper describes the specific data sources, task formulations, and evaluation metrics used to assess model performance on these tasks. This includes both automatic metrics (e.g. ROUGE scores for summarization) as well as human evaluations to assess the coherence and relevance of the generated outputs.
The authors then present baseline results using state-of-the-art retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models, including models that combine large language models with knowledge retrieval components. These baselines provide a starting point for future research and development of RAG systems in the legal domain.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a strong case for the importance of developing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) capabilities in the legal domain, where access to relevant precedents and legal knowledge is critical. The LegalBench-RAG benchmark provides a well-designed evaluation framework to drive progress in this area.
However, the paper acknowledges several limitations of the current benchmark, including the fact that it only covers a subset of legal tasks and that the dataset may not be fully representative of the diversity of legal documents and reasoning. There is also potential for bias in the human evaluations, which could be addressed through further methodological refinements.
Additionally, the baseline results suggest that current state-of-the-art RAG models still have room for improvement in terms of their legal reasoning and generation abilities. Further research will be needed to develop models that can more effectively leverage legal knowledge to produce high-quality, relevant outputs.
Conclusion
In summary, this paper introduces the LegalBench-RAG benchmark, a new evaluation framework for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems in the legal domain. The benchmark provides a standardized way to assess the performance of RAG models on key legal tasks, with the goal of driving progress in this important area of AI research and application. The baseline results presented in the paper suggest that there is still significant room for improvement, and the authors have provided a valuable resource for future researchers and developers working on legal AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
6
LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
Nicholas Pipitone, Ghita Houir Alami
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are showing promising potential, and are becoming increasingly relevant in AI-powered legal applications. Existing benchmarks, such as LegalBench, assess the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the legal domain, but there is a critical gap in evaluating the retrieval component of RAG systems. To address this, we introduce LegalBench-RAG, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the retrieval step of RAG pipelines within the legal space. LegalBench-RAG emphasizes precise retrieval by focusing on extracting minimal, highly relevant text segments from legal documents. These highly relevant snippets are preferred over retrieving document IDs, or large sequences of imprecise chunks, both of which can exceed context window limitations. Long context windows cost more to process, induce higher latency, and lead LLMs to forget or hallucinate information. Additionally, precise results allow LLMs to generate citations for the end user. The LegalBench-RAG benchmark is constructed by retracing the context used in LegalBench queries back to their original locations within the legal corpus, resulting in a dataset of 6,858 query-answer pairs over a corpus of over 79M characters, entirely human-annotated by legal experts. We also introduce LegalBench-RAG-mini, a lightweight version for rapid iteration and experimentation. By providing a dedicated benchmark for legal retrieval, LegalBench-RAG serves as a critical tool for companies and researchers focused on enhancing the accuracy and performance of RAG systems in the legal domain. The LegalBench-RAG dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/zeroentropy-cc/legalbenchrag.
Read more8/21/2024
0
RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
Robert Friel, Masha Belyi, Atindriyo Sanyal
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard architectural pattern for incorporating domain-specific knowledge into user-facing chat applications powered by Large Language Models (LLMs). RAG systems are characterized by (1) a document retriever that queries a domain-specific corpus for context information relevant to an input query, and (2) an LLM that generates a response based on the provided query and context. However, comprehensive evaluation of RAG systems remains a challenge due to the lack of unified evaluation criteria and annotated datasets. In response, we introduce RAGBench: the first comprehensive, large-scale RAG benchmark dataset of 100k examples. It covers five unique industry-specific domains and various RAG task types. RAGBench examples are sourced from industry corpora such as user manuals, making it particularly relevant for industry applications. Further, we formalize the TRACe evaluation framework: a set of explainable and actionable RAG evaluation metrics applicable across all RAG domains. We release the labeled dataset at https://huggingface.co/datasets/rungalileo/ragbench. RAGBench explainable labels facilitate holistic evaluation of RAG systems, enabling actionable feedback for continuous improvement of production applications. Thorough extensive benchmarking, we find that LLM-based RAG evaluation methods struggle to compete with a finetuned RoBERTa model on the RAG evaluation task. We identify areas where existing approaches fall short and propose the adoption of RAGBench with TRACe towards advancing the state of RAG evaluation systems.
Read more7/17/2024
0
BERGEN: A Benchmarking Library for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
David Rau, Herv'e D'ejean, Nadezhda Chirkova, Thibault Formal, Shuai Wang, Vassilina Nikoulina, St'ephane Clinchant
Retrieval-Augmented Generation allows to enhance Large Language Models with external knowledge. In response to the recent popularity of generative LLMs, many RAG approaches have been proposed, which involve an intricate number of different configurations such as evaluation datasets, collections, metrics, retrievers, and LLMs. Inconsistent benchmarking poses a major challenge in comparing approaches and understanding the impact of each component in the pipeline. In this work, we study best practices that lay the groundwork for a systematic evaluation of RAG and present BERGEN, an end-to-end library for reproducible research standardizing RAG experiments. In an extensive study focusing on QA, we benchmark different state-of-the-art retrievers, rerankers, and LLMs. Additionally, we analyze existing RAG metrics and datasets. Our open-source library BERGEN is available under url{https://github.com/naver/bergen}.
Read more7/2/2024
0
CodeRAG-Bench: Can Retrieval Augment Code Generation?
Zora Zhiruo Wang, Akari Asai, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Frank F. Xu, Yiqing Xie, Graham Neubig, Daniel Fried
While language models (LMs) have proven remarkably adept at generating code, many programs are challenging for LMs to generate using their parametric knowledge alone. Providing external contexts such as library documentation can facilitate generating accurate and functional code. Despite the success of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in various text-oriented tasks, its potential for improving code generation remains under-explored. In this work, we conduct a systematic, large-scale analysis by asking: in what scenarios can retrieval benefit code generation models? and what challenges remain? We first curate a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, CodeRAG-Bench, encompassing three categories of code generation tasks, including basic programming, open-domain, and repository-level problems. We aggregate documents from five sources for models to retrieve contexts: competition solutions, online tutorials, library documentation, StackOverflow posts, and GitHub repositories. We examine top-performing models on CodeRAG-Bench by providing contexts retrieved from one or multiple sources. While notable gains are made in final code generation by retrieving high-quality contexts across various settings, our analysis reveals room for improvement -- current retrievers still struggle to fetch useful contexts especially with limited lexical overlap, and generators fail to improve with limited context lengths or abilities to integrate additional contexts. We hope CodeRAG-Bench serves as an effective testbed to encourage further development of advanced code-oriented RAG methods.
Read more6/21/2024