RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces RAGBench, a benchmark for evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems.
- RAG systems are a type of natural language generation model that can incorporate information from external knowledge sources to improve the quality and coherence of their outputs.
- RAGBench provides a set of tasks and datasets to assess the performance, robustness, and explainability of RAG models across a variety of domains.
Plain English Explanation
RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems is a new benchmark for evaluating a particular type of AI language model called a "retrieval-augmented generation" (RAG) system. RAG models are designed to generate more informative and coherent text by retrieving relevant information from external sources and incorporating it into their outputs.
The key idea behind RAGBench is to provide a comprehensive set of tasks and datasets that can be used to assess how well these RAG models perform. This includes measuring things like the quality, robustness, and explainability of the models' outputs across a variety of different domains, from general knowledge to specific topics.
By having a standardized benchmark like RAGBench, researchers and developers can more easily compare the capabilities of different RAG models and identify areas for improvement. This can help accelerate the development of more powerful and reliable natural language generation systems that can better leverage external information sources.
Some of the specific benchmarks and datasets included in RAGBench cover topics like answering questions, generating summaries, and completing writing tasks. The benchmark also includes ways to assess how well the models can explain their reasoning and decision-making processes.
Overall, RAGBench provides a valuable tool for advancing the state-of-the-art in retrieval-augmented generation and helping to make these types of AI systems more transparent and trustworthy.
Technical Explanation
RAGBench is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the performance, robustness, and explainability of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. RAG models are a type of natural language generation (NLG) system that can incorporate relevant information from external knowledge sources to produce more informative and coherent outputs.
The benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks and datasets spanning multiple domains, such as question answering, summarization, and open-ended text generation. These tasks are designed to assess different aspects of RAG model capabilities, including their ability to:
- Retrieve relevant information from knowledge bases or other sources
- Integrate the retrieved information seamlessly into their generated outputs
- Explain the reasoning behind their responses in a transparent manner
In addition to standard evaluation metrics, RAGBench also includes novel explainability metrics to quantify the interpretability of the models' decision-making processes. This allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the model's inner workings and the extent to which they can provide meaningful justifications for their outputs.
The benchmark is implemented using a modular and extensible architecture, enabling the easy integration of new tasks, datasets, and evaluation methodologies. This flexibility allows researchers to continuously expand the scope of the benchmark and keep pace with the rapid advancements in the field of retrieval-augmented generation.
CRUD-RAG and DomainRAG are two additional benchmarks that complement RAGBench by focusing on specific domains, such as Chinese language tasks and domain-specific knowledge retrieval, respectively. Together, these benchmarks provide a comprehensive ecosystem for evaluating the performance and explainability of RAG systems in a variety of contexts.
Critical Analysis
The RAGBench framework represents a significant step forward in the field of retrieval-augmented generation by providing a standardized and rigorous evaluation platform. By incorporating a range of tasks, datasets, and explainability metrics, the benchmark allows for a more holistic assessment of RAG model capabilities.
However, the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the current version of RAGBench primarily focuses on English-language tasks, and there is a need to expand the benchmark to support other languages and cultural contexts. Additionally, the paper suggests that future work could explore the integration of more dynamic and open-ended retrieval scenarios, beyond the largely static knowledge sources used in the current benchmark.
Another potential area for improvement is the incorporation of more diverse and challenging datasets, particularly in domains where the retrieval and integration of knowledge is more complex, such as scientific or technical writing. This could help push the boundaries of RAG model performance and identify areas where further research and development is needed.
Furthermore, the paper does not address the potential ethical and societal implications of these retrieval-augmented generation systems, such as the risk of amplifying biases or the generation of misinformation. As these models become more advanced and widely deployed, it will be crucial to consider such considerations and develop appropriate safeguards and guidelines.
Overall, RAGBench represents an important contribution to the field of natural language generation and provides a valuable tool for accelerating the development of more capable, robust, and transparent retrieval-augmented systems. However, continued research and a broader consideration of the societal impact of these technologies will be essential to ensure they are developed and deployed responsibly.
Conclusion
RAGBench is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the performance, robustness, and explainability of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. By providing a diverse set of tasks and datasets, as well as novel explainability metrics, the benchmark enables a more thorough assessment of the capabilities and inner workings of these types of natural language generation models.
The introduction of RAGBench represents a significant advancement in the field of retrieval-augmented generation, as it allows researchers and developers to more effectively compare and improve upon the state-of-the-art in this rapidly evolving area of AI. Moreover, the modular and extensible design of the benchmark ensures that it can be continuously updated and expanded to keep pace with the latest advancements.
While RAGBench has some limitations, such as the current focus on English-language tasks, the framework provides a valuable foundation for further research and development. As these retrieval-augmented generation systems become more sophisticated and widely deployed, it will be crucial to address ethical and societal considerations to ensure they are developed and used responsibly.
Overall, the RAGBench benchmark is a valuable tool that will undoubtedly contribute to the advancement of more capable, transparent, and trustworthy natural language generation systems that can effectively leverage external knowledge sources.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
Robert Friel, Masha Belyi, Atindriyo Sanyal
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard architectural pattern for incorporating domain-specific knowledge into user-facing chat applications powered by Large Language Models (LLMs). RAG systems are characterized by (1) a document retriever that queries a domain-specific corpus for context information relevant to an input query, and (2) an LLM that generates a response based on the provided query and context. However, comprehensive evaluation of RAG systems remains a challenge due to the lack of unified evaluation criteria and annotated datasets. In response, we introduce RAGBench: the first comprehensive, large-scale RAG benchmark dataset of 100k examples. It covers five unique industry-specific domains and various RAG task types. RAGBench examples are sourced from industry corpora such as user manuals, making it particularly relevant for industry applications. Further, we formalize the TRACe evaluation framework: a set of explainable and actionable RAG evaluation metrics applicable across all RAG domains. We release the labeled dataset at https://huggingface.co/datasets/rungalileo/ragbench. RAGBench explainable labels facilitate holistic evaluation of RAG systems, enabling actionable feedback for continuous improvement of production applications. Thorough extensive benchmarking, we find that LLM-based RAG evaluation methods struggle to compete with a finetuned RoBERTa model on the RAG evaluation task. We identify areas where existing approaches fall short and propose the adoption of RAGBench with TRACe towards advancing the state of RAG evaluation systems.
Read more7/17/2024
6
LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
Nicholas Pipitone, Ghita Houir Alami
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are showing promising potential, and are becoming increasingly relevant in AI-powered legal applications. Existing benchmarks, such as LegalBench, assess the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the legal domain, but there is a critical gap in evaluating the retrieval component of RAG systems. To address this, we introduce LegalBench-RAG, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the retrieval step of RAG pipelines within the legal space. LegalBench-RAG emphasizes precise retrieval by focusing on extracting minimal, highly relevant text segments from legal documents. These highly relevant snippets are preferred over retrieving document IDs, or large sequences of imprecise chunks, both of which can exceed context window limitations. Long context windows cost more to process, induce higher latency, and lead LLMs to forget or hallucinate information. Additionally, precise results allow LLMs to generate citations for the end user. The LegalBench-RAG benchmark is constructed by retracing the context used in LegalBench queries back to their original locations within the legal corpus, resulting in a dataset of 6,858 query-answer pairs over a corpus of over 79M characters, entirely human-annotated by legal experts. We also introduce LegalBench-RAG-mini, a lightweight version for rapid iteration and experimentation. By providing a dedicated benchmark for legal retrieval, LegalBench-RAG serves as a critical tool for companies and researchers focused on enhancing the accuracy and performance of RAG systems in the legal domain. The LegalBench-RAG dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/zeroentropy-cc/legalbenchrag.
Read more8/21/2024
0
BERGEN: A Benchmarking Library for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
David Rau, Herv'e D'ejean, Nadezhda Chirkova, Thibault Formal, Shuai Wang, Vassilina Nikoulina, St'ephane Clinchant
Retrieval-Augmented Generation allows to enhance Large Language Models with external knowledge. In response to the recent popularity of generative LLMs, many RAG approaches have been proposed, which involve an intricate number of different configurations such as evaluation datasets, collections, metrics, retrievers, and LLMs. Inconsistent benchmarking poses a major challenge in comparing approaches and understanding the impact of each component in the pipeline. In this work, we study best practices that lay the groundwork for a systematic evaluation of RAG and present BERGEN, an end-to-end library for reproducible research standardizing RAG experiments. In an extensive study focusing on QA, we benchmark different state-of-the-art retrievers, rerankers, and LLMs. Additionally, we analyze existing RAG metrics and datasets. Our open-source library BERGEN is available under url{https://github.com/naver/bergen}.
Read more7/2/2024
⛏️
0
Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey
Hao Yu, Aoran Gan, Kai Zhang, Shiwei Tong, Qi Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently gained traction in natural language processing. Numerous studies and real-world applications are leveraging its ability to enhance generative models through external information retrieval. Evaluating these RAG systems, however, poses unique challenges due to their hybrid structure and reliance on dynamic knowledge sources. To better understand these challenges, we conduct A Unified Evaluation Process of RAG (Auepora) and aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the evaluation and benchmarks of RAG systems. Specifically, we examine and compare several quantifiable metrics of the Retrieval and Generation components, such as relevance, accuracy, and faithfulness, within the current RAG benchmarks, encompassing the possible output and ground truth pairs. We then analyze the various datasets and metrics, discuss the limitations of current benchmarks, and suggest potential directions to advance the field of RAG benchmarks.
Read more7/4/2024