LLM-QBench: A Benchmark Towards the Best Practice for Post-training Quantization of Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a new benchmark called LLM-QBench for evaluating post-training quantization of large language models
- Aims to establish best practices and guidelines for effectively quantizing large language models
- Examines various quantization techniques and their impact on model performance across different tasks and datasets
Plain English Explanation
LLM-QBench is a new benchmark designed to help researchers and developers find the best ways to reduce the size and computational demands of large language models without significantly impacting their performance.
Large language models like GPT-3 have become incredibly powerful, but they also require a lot of memory and processing power to run. Quantization is a technique that can compress these models by reducing the precision of the numerical values used to represent the model parameters. However, finding the right balance between compression and performance is crucial.
The LLM-QBench benchmark evaluates different quantization techniques across a variety of tasks and datasets. This allows researchers to identify the "best practices" - the quantization methods that provide the greatest efficiency gains with the smallest impact on a model's capabilities. Techniques like APTQ and CBQ are examined, and the results can help quantify the trade-offs between model scale, precision, and capabilities.
By establishing a common benchmark, this research aims to accelerate progress in making large language models more compact and efficient, which could unlock their use in a wider range of real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The LLM-QBench benchmark covers a range of quantization techniques and evaluates their impact on large language model performance across various tasks and datasets. This includes standard post-training quantization methods as well as more advanced techniques like APTQ and CBQ.
The benchmark assesses quantized models on a diverse set of tasks, including natural language understanding, text generation, and task-specific fine-tuning. This enables a comprehensive analysis of how quantization impacts model capabilities across a range of applications.
The results from LLM-QBench are intended to establish best practices and guidelines for effectively quantizing large language models. By identifying the sweet spot between compression and performance, this work aims to help make these powerful models more practical and accessible for real-world deployment.
Critical Analysis
While the LLM-QBench benchmark provides a valuable framework for evaluating quantization techniques, the paper acknowledges that the findings may be specific to the particular models and datasets used in the study. Extending the benchmark to include a broader range of large language models and tasks would help strengthen the generalizability of the conclusions.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying mechanisms or theory behind the different quantization methods. A more thorough exploration of the trade-offs and design considerations for each technique could provide additional insights for practitioners.
Lastly, the benchmark focuses primarily on post-training quantization, but there may be value in also exploring quantization-aware training approaches, which could potentially yield even greater efficiency gains. Incorporating such methods into future iterations of the benchmark could further enhance its utility.
Conclusion
The LLM-QBench benchmark represents an important step towards establishing best practices for quantizing large language models. By comprehensively evaluating a range of quantization techniques across diverse tasks and datasets, this research aims to help unlock the potential of these powerful models for a wider range of real-world applications.
The findings from LLM-QBench can guide developers and researchers in choosing the most effective quantization strategies, balancing the competing demands of model performance, memory usage, and computational efficiency. As the field of large language models continues to evolve, this benchmark can serve as a valuable tool for driving progress and ensuring that these transformative technologies can be deployed more widely and sustainably.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LLM-QBench: A Benchmark Towards the Best Practice for Post-training Quantization of Large Language Models
Ruihao Gong, Yang Yong, Shiqiao Gu, Yushi Huang, Chentao Lv, Yunchen Zhang, Xianglong Liu, Dacheng Tao
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) are propelling us toward artificial general intelligence with their remarkable emergent abilities and reasoning capabilities. However, the substantial computational and memory requirements limit the widespread adoption. Quantization, a key compression technique, can effectively mitigate these demands by compressing and accelerating LLMs, albeit with potential risks to accuracy. Numerous studies have aimed to minimize the accuracy loss associated with quantization. However, their quantization configurations vary from each other and cannot be fairly compared. In this paper, we present LLMC, a plug-and-play compression toolkit, to fairly and systematically explore the impact of quantization. LLMC integrates dozens of algorithms, models, and hardwares, offering high extensibility from integer to floating-point quantization, from LLM to vision-language (VLM) model, from fixed-bit to mixed precision, and from quantization to sparsification. Powered by this versatile toolkit, our benchmark covers three key aspects: calibration data, algorithms (three strategies), and data formats, providing novel insights and detailed analyses for further research and practical guidance for users. Our toolkit is available at href{LLMC}{https://github.com/ModelTC/llmc}.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Evaluating the Generalization Ability of Quantized LLMs: Benchmark, Analysis, and Toolbox
Yijun Liu, Yuan Meng, Fang Wu, Shenhao Peng, Hang Yao, Chaoyu Guan, Chen Tang, Xinzhu Ma, Zhi Wang, Wenwu Zhu
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited exciting progress in multiple scenarios, while the huge computational demands hinder their deployments in lots of real-world applications. As an effective means to reduce memory footprint and inference cost, quantization also faces challenges in performance degradation at low bit-widths. Understanding the impact of quantization on LLM capabilities, especially the generalization ability, is crucial. However, the community's main focus remains on the algorithms and models of quantization, with insufficient attention given to whether the quantized models can retain the strong generalization abilities of LLMs. In this work, we fill this gap by providing a comprehensive benchmark suite for this research topic, including an evaluation system, detailed analyses, and a general toolbox. Specifically, based on the dominant pipeline in LLM quantization, we primarily explore the impact of calibration data distribution on the generalization of quantized LLMs and conduct the benchmark using more than 40 datasets within two main scenarios. Based on this benchmark, we conduct extensive experiments with two well-known LLMs (English and Chinese) and four quantization algorithms to investigate this topic in-depth, yielding several counter-intuitive and valuable findings, e.g., models quantized using a calibration set with the same distribution as the test data are not necessarily optimal. Besides, to facilitate future research, we also release a modular-designed toolbox, which decouples the overall pipeline into several separate components, e.g., base LLM module, dataset module, quantizer module, etc. and allows subsequent researchers to easily assemble their methods through a simple configuration. Our benchmark suite is publicly available at https://github.com/TsingmaoAI/MI-optimize
Read more6/21/2024
0
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Quantization Strategies for Large Language Models
Renren Jin, Jiangcun Du, Wuwei Huang, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, Deyi Xiong
Increasing the number of parameters in large language models (LLMs) usually improves performance in downstream tasks but raises compute and memory costs, making deployment difficult in resource-limited settings. Quantization techniques, which reduce the bits needed for model weights or activations with minimal performance loss, have become popular due to the rise of LLMs. However, most quantization studies use pre-trained LLMs, and the impact of quantization on instruction-tuned LLMs and the relationship between perplexity and benchmark performance of quantized LLMs are not well understood. Evaluation of quantized LLMs is often limited to language modeling and a few classification tasks, leaving their performance on other benchmarks unclear. To address these gaps, we propose a structured evaluation framework consisting of three critical dimensions: (1) knowledge & capacity, (2) alignment, and (3) efficiency, and conduct extensive experiments across ten diverse benchmarks. Our experimental results indicate that LLMs with 4-bit quantization can retain performance comparable to their non-quantized counterparts, and perplexity can serve as a proxy metric for quantized LLMs on most benchmarks. Furthermore, quantized LLMs with larger parameter scales can outperform smaller LLMs. Despite the memory savings achieved through quantization, it can also slow down the inference speed of LLMs. Consequently, substantial engineering efforts and hardware support are imperative to achieve a balanced optimization of decoding speed and memory consumption in the context of quantized LLMs.
Read more6/7/2024
💬
1
Evaluating Quantized Large Language Models
Shiyao Li, Xuefei Ning, Luning Wang, Tengxuan Liu, Xiangsheng Shi, Shengen Yan, Guohao Dai, Huazhong Yang, Yu Wang
Post-training quantization (PTQ) has emerged as a promising technique to reduce the cost of large language models (LLMs). Specifically, PTQ can effectively mitigate memory consumption and reduce computational overhead in LLMs. To meet the requirements of both high efficiency and performance across diverse scenarios, a comprehensive evaluation of quantized LLMs is essential to guide the selection of quantization methods. This paper presents a thorough evaluation of these factors by evaluating the effect of PTQ on Weight, Activation, and KV Cache on 11 model families, including OPT, LLaMA2, Falcon, Bloomz, Mistral, ChatGLM, Vicuna, LongChat, StableLM, Gemma, and Mamba, with parameters ranging from 125M to 180B. The evaluation encompasses five types of tasks: basic NLP, emergent ability, trustworthiness, dialogue, and long-context tasks. Moreover, we also evaluate the state-of-the-art (SOTA) quantization methods to demonstrate their applicability. Based on the extensive experiments, we systematically summarize the effect of quantization, provide recommendations to apply quantization techniques, and point out future directions. The code can be found in https://github.com/thu-nics/qllm-eval.
Read more6/7/2024