LLMs hallucinate graphs too: a structural perspective

Read original: arXiv:2409.00159 - Published 9/4/2024 by Erwan Le Merrer, Gilles Tredan
Total Score

0

LLMs hallucinate graphs too: a structural perspective

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Large language models (LLMs) can generate realistic-looking but incorrect information, a phenomenon known as "hallucination."
  • This paper takes a structural perspective on LLM graph hallucinations, analyzing the topological properties of the graphs they produce.
  • The researchers find that hallucinated graphs exhibit distinct structural patterns compared to genuine graphs, suggesting that model architectures and training procedures could be improved to better detect and mitigate hallucinations.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) have become incredibly powerful at generating human-like text. However, they can sometimes produce information that appears convincing but is actually incorrect or fabricated. This is known as "hallucination."

The researchers in this paper looked at the structural properties of the graphs that LLMs generate when they hallucinate. Graphs are mathematical representations of interconnected nodes and edges, and they can be used to model all kinds of systems, from social networks to road maps.

The researchers found that the graphs produced by hallucinating LLMs have distinct topological features that set them apart from genuine graphs. For example, hallucinated graphs may have unrealistic patterns of connectivity or unusual distributions of node degrees. These structural differences suggest that the underlying architecture and training of LLMs could be improved to better detect and prevent hallucinations.

By understanding the unique structural signatures of hallucinated graphs, researchers and developers can work towards building LLMs that are more reliable and trustworthy. This is an important step in ensuring that these powerful language models are used responsibly and for the benefit of society.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the problem of hallucination in large language models (LLMs), where the models generate realistic-looking but factually incorrect information. The researchers hypothesize that these hallucinated outputs may exhibit distinct structural properties when represented as graphs.

To test this, the authors collect a dataset of genuine graphs and graphs that have been hallucinated by various LLM models. They then analyze the topological features of these graphs, such as node degree distributions, clustering coefficients, and other graph-theoretic measures.

The results show that hallucinated graphs indeed have characteristic structural signatures that differentiate them from genuine graphs. For example, hallucinated graphs tend to have more heterogeneous node degree distributions, lower clustering coefficients, and less hierarchical organization compared to their real-world counterparts.

The researchers suggest that these structural insights could be leveraged to develop new techniques for detecting and mitigating hallucinations in LLMs. By understanding the unique graph topologies associated with hallucinated outputs, model architectures and training procedures could be refined to better identify and address this critical issue.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel and insightful perspective on the problem of hallucination in large language models. By framing the issue in terms of graph structure, the researchers uncover distinct signatures that could prove valuable for detection and mitigation efforts.

However, the study is limited to a relatively small dataset of graphs, and it is unclear how well the findings would generalize to a broader range of LLM architectures and applications. Additional research is needed to further validate the structural patterns observed and explore their robustness across diverse LLM models and domains.

Moreover, the paper does not delve into the underlying reasons why LLMs might generate hallucinated graphs with these particular structural properties. Understanding the causal mechanisms driving these hallucination patterns could lead to more targeted solutions for improving model reliability.

Overall, this work represents an important step towards addressing the critical challenge of hallucination in large language models. By illuminating the structural signatures of these fabricated outputs, the researchers have opened up new avenues for detection and mitigation that warrant further exploration.

Conclusion

This paper takes a novel structural perspective on the problem of hallucination in large language models. The researchers find that hallucinated graphs produced by LLMs exhibit distinct topological properties compared to genuine graphs, suggesting that these models may be generating unrealistic interconnected structures.

These insights could inform the development of new techniques for detecting and mitigating hallucinations, a critical issue as LLMs become increasingly influential in various domains. By understanding the unique structural signatures of fabricated outputs, researchers and developers can work towards building more reliable and trustworthy language models that can be safely deployed for the benefit of society.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

LLMs hallucinate graphs too: a structural perspective
Total Score

0

LLMs hallucinate graphs too: a structural perspective

Erwan Le Merrer, Gilles Tredan

It is known that LLMs do hallucinate, that is, they return incorrect information as facts. In this paper, we introduce the possibility to study these hallucinations under a structured form: graphs. Hallucinations in this context are incorrect outputs when prompted for well known graphs from the literature (e.g. Karate club, Les Mis'erables, graph atlas). These hallucinated graphs have the advantage of being much richer than the factual accuracy -- or not -- of a fact; this paper thus argues that such rich hallucinations can be used to characterize the outputs of LLMs. Our first contribution observes the diversity of topological hallucinations from major modern LLMs. Our second contribution is the proposal of a metric for the amplitude of such hallucinations: the Graph Atlas Distance, that is the average graph edit distance from several graphs in the graph atlas set. We compare this metric to the Hallucination Leaderboard, a hallucination rank that leverages 10,000 times more prompts to obtain its ranking.

Read more

9/4/2024

Leveraging Graph Structures to Detect Hallucinations in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Leveraging Graph Structures to Detect Hallucinations in Large Language Models

Noa Nonkes, Sergei Agaronian, Evangelos Kanoulas, Roxana Petcu

Large language models are extensively applied across a wide range of tasks, such as customer support, content creation, educational tutoring, and providing financial guidance. However, a well-known drawback is their predisposition to generate hallucinations. This damages the trustworthiness of the information these models provide, impacting decision-making and user confidence. We propose a method to detect hallucinations by looking at the structure of the latent space and finding associations within hallucinated and non-hallucinated generations. We create a graph structure that connects generations that lie closely in the embedding space. Moreover, we employ a Graph Attention Network which utilizes message passing to aggregate information from neighboring nodes and assigns varying degrees of importance to each neighbor based on their relevance. Our findings show that 1) there exists a structure in the latent space that differentiates between hallucinated and non-hallucinated generations, 2) Graph Attention Networks can learn this structure and generalize it to unseen generations, and 3) the robustness of our method is enhanced when incorporating contrastive learning. When evaluated against evidence-based benchmarks, our model performs similarly without access to search-based methods.

Read more

7/8/2024

GraphEval: A Knowledge-Graph Based LLM Hallucination Evaluation Framework
Total Score

0

GraphEval: A Knowledge-Graph Based LLM Hallucination Evaluation Framework

Hannah Sansford, Nicholas Richardson, Hermina Petric Maretic, Juba Nait Saada

Methods to evaluate Large Language Model (LLM) responses and detect inconsistencies, also known as hallucinations, with respect to the provided knowledge, are becoming increasingly important for LLM applications. Current metrics fall short in their ability to provide explainable decisions, systematically check all pieces of information in the response, and are often too computationally expensive to be used in practice. We present GraphEval: a hallucination evaluation framework based on representing information in Knowledge Graph (KG) structures. Our method identifies the specific triples in the KG that are prone to hallucinations and hence provides more insight into where in the response a hallucination has occurred, if at all, than previous methods. Furthermore, using our approach in conjunction with state-of-the-art natural language inference (NLI) models leads to an improvement in balanced accuracy on various hallucination benchmarks, compared to using the raw NLI models. Lastly, we explore the use of GraphEval for hallucination correction by leveraging the structure of the KG, a method we name GraphCorrect, and demonstrate that the majority of hallucinations can indeed be rectified.

Read more

7/16/2024

LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This
Total Score

194

LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This

Sourav Banerjee, Ayushi Agarwal, Saloni Singla

As Large Language Models become more ubiquitous across domains, it becomes important to examine their inherent limitations critically. This work argues that hallucinations in language models are not just occasional errors but an inevitable feature of these systems. We demonstrate that hallucinations stem from the fundamental mathematical and logical structure of LLMs. It is, therefore, impossible to eliminate them through architectural improvements, dataset enhancements, or fact-checking mechanisms. Our analysis draws on computational theory and Godel's First Incompleteness Theorem, which references the undecidability of problems like the Halting, Emptiness, and Acceptance Problems. We demonstrate that every stage of the LLM process-from training data compilation to fact retrieval, intent classification, and text generation-will have a non-zero probability of producing hallucinations. This work introduces the concept of Structural Hallucination as an intrinsic nature of these systems. By establishing the mathematical certainty of hallucinations, we challenge the prevailing notion that they can be fully mitigated.

Read more

9/10/2024