Leveraging Graph Structures to Detect Hallucinations in Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.04485 - Published 7/8/2024 by Noa Nonkes, Sergei Agaronian, Evangelos Kanoulas, Roxana Petcu
Total Score

0

Leveraging Graph Structures to Detect Hallucinations in Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores using graph structures to detect hallucinations in large language models.
  • Hallucinations occur when language models generate factually incorrect or nonsensical content.
  • The proposed approach leverages graph representations to identify these hallucinations.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a method for detecting hallucinations in large language models, which are AI systems that can generate human-like text. Hallucinations occur when these models produce information that is factually incorrect or makes no sense.

To address this issue, the researchers developed an approach that uses graph structures. Graphs are a way of representing information as a network of interconnected nodes and edges. In this case, the graph represents the relationships between the concepts and facts that the language model has learned.

By analyzing the graph structure, the researchers were able to identify when the language model was generating text that did not fit coherently into the graph. This signaled that the model was hallucinating - producing content that was not grounded in its actual knowledge.

The key idea is that hallucinations will disrupt the typical patterns and connections in the model's internal knowledge representation. By detecting these anomalies in the graph structure, the researchers could flag instances where the model was generating unreliable or nonsensical output.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel approach called PollMGraph for detecting hallucinations in large language models. The core insight is that hallucinations can be identified by analyzing the graph-structured representations learned by the language model.

The researchers first construct a knowledge graph from the model's training data, which captures the relationships between the concepts and facts the model has learned. They then monitor the model's generation process, tracking how the generated text maps onto this knowledge graph.

Hallucinations are detected when the generated text cannot be well-aligned with the knowledge graph, indicating that the model has produced content that is not grounded in its actual learned information. This manifests as anomalies or disruptions in the typical graph structure.

By leveraging the graph-based representation, the approach can identify hallucinations without requiring access to the model's internal parameters or training data. This makes it a practical technique for monitoring and mitigating hallucinations in deployed large language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a promising approach for detecting and mitigating hallucinations in large language models, which is an important challenge as these models become more widely deployed.

One potential limitation is that the approach relies on the quality and coverage of the knowledge graph constructed from the training data. If the graph is incomplete or inaccurate, it may fail to properly identify all instances of hallucination. Further research could explore ways to dynamically update and refine the knowledge graph as the model evolves.

Additionally, the paper does not address the root causes of hallucination, such as biases or gaps in the training data. While the proposed method can detect these issues, addressing the underlying problems may require more fundamental changes to model training and architecture.

Overall, the PollMGraph technique represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing effort to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models as they become more pervasive in real-world applications.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach called PollMGraph that leverages graph-structured representations to detect hallucinations in large language models. By analyzing anomalies in the knowledge graph learned by the model, the technique can identify when the model is generating content that is not grounded in its actual understanding.

The proposed method provides a practical way to monitor and mitigate hallucinations without requiring access to the model's internal parameters or training data. As large language models become more widely deployed, techniques like PollMGraph will be crucial for ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of the text they generate.

While the paper represents an important step forward, further research is needed to address the root causes of hallucination and improve the robustness of these powerful AI systems. Nevertheless, the PollMGraph approach demonstrates the value of leveraging graph-based representations to enhance the transparency and accountability of large language models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Leveraging Graph Structures to Detect Hallucinations in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Leveraging Graph Structures to Detect Hallucinations in Large Language Models

Noa Nonkes, Sergei Agaronian, Evangelos Kanoulas, Roxana Petcu

Large language models are extensively applied across a wide range of tasks, such as customer support, content creation, educational tutoring, and providing financial guidance. However, a well-known drawback is their predisposition to generate hallucinations. This damages the trustworthiness of the information these models provide, impacting decision-making and user confidence. We propose a method to detect hallucinations by looking at the structure of the latent space and finding associations within hallucinated and non-hallucinated generations. We create a graph structure that connects generations that lie closely in the embedding space. Moreover, we employ a Graph Attention Network which utilizes message passing to aggregate information from neighboring nodes and assigns varying degrees of importance to each neighbor based on their relevance. Our findings show that 1) there exists a structure in the latent space that differentiates between hallucinated and non-hallucinated generations, 2) Graph Attention Networks can learn this structure and generalize it to unseen generations, and 3) the robustness of our method is enhanced when incorporating contrastive learning. When evaluated against evidence-based benchmarks, our model performs similarly without access to search-based methods.

Read more

7/8/2024

On Early Detection of Hallucinations in Factual Question Answering
Total Score

1

On Early Detection of Hallucinations in Factual Question Answering

Ben Snyder, Marius Moisescu, Muhammad Bilal Zafar

While large language models (LLMs) have taken great strides towards helping humans with a plethora of tasks, hallucinations remain a major impediment towards gaining user trust. The fluency and coherence of model generations even when hallucinating makes detection a difficult task. In this work, we explore if the artifacts associated with the model generations can provide hints that the generation will contain hallucinations. Specifically, we probe LLMs at 1) the inputs via Integrated Gradients based token attribution, 2) the outputs via the Softmax probabilities, and 3) the internal state via self-attention and fully-connected layer activations for signs of hallucinations on open-ended question answering tasks. Our results show that the distributions of these artifacts tend to differ between hallucinated and non-hallucinated generations. Building on this insight, we train binary classifiers that use these artifacts as input features to classify model generations into hallucinations and non-hallucinations. These hallucination classifiers achieve up to $0.80$ AUROC. We also show that tokens preceding a hallucination can already predict the subsequent hallucination even before it occurs.

Read more

8/23/2024

Training Language Models on the Knowledge Graph: Insights on Hallucinations and Their Detectability
Total Score

0

Training Language Models on the Knowledge Graph: Insights on Hallucinations and Their Detectability

Jiri Hron, Laura Culp, Gamaleldin Elsayed, Rosanne Liu, Ben Adlam, Maxwell Bileschi, Bernd Bohnet, JD Co-Reyes, Noah Fiedel, C. Daniel Freeman, Izzeddin Gur, Kathleen Kenealy, Jaehoon Lee, Peter J. Liu, Gaurav Mishra, Igor Mordatch, Azade Nova, Roman Novak, Aaron Parisi, Jeffrey Pennington, Alex Rizkowsky, Isabelle Simpson, Hanie Sedghi, Jascha Sohl-dickstein, Kevin Swersky, Sharad Vikram, Tris Warkentin, Lechao Xiao, Kelvin Xu, Jasper Snoek, Simon Kornblith

While many capabilities of language models (LMs) improve with increased training budget, the influence of scale on hallucinations is not yet fully understood. Hallucinations come in many forms, and there is no universally accepted definition. We thus focus on studying only those hallucinations where a correct answer appears verbatim in the training set. To fully control the training data content, we construct a knowledge graph (KG)-based dataset, and use it to train a set of increasingly large LMs. We find that for a fixed dataset, larger and longer-trained LMs hallucinate less. However, hallucinating on $leq5$% of the training data requires an order of magnitude larger model, and thus an order of magnitude more compute, than Hoffmann et al. (2022) reported was optimal. Given this costliness, we study how hallucination detectors depend on scale. While we see detector size improves performance on fixed LM's outputs, we find an inverse relationship between the scale of the LM and the detectability of its hallucinations.

Read more

8/16/2024

LLMs hallucinate graphs too: a structural perspective
Total Score

0

LLMs hallucinate graphs too: a structural perspective

Erwan Le Merrer, Gilles Tredan

It is known that LLMs do hallucinate, that is, they return incorrect information as facts. In this paper, we introduce the possibility to study these hallucinations under a structured form: graphs. Hallucinations in this context are incorrect outputs when prompted for well known graphs from the literature (e.g. Karate club, Les Mis'erables, graph atlas). These hallucinated graphs have the advantage of being much richer than the factual accuracy -- or not -- of a fact; this paper thus argues that such rich hallucinations can be used to characterize the outputs of LLMs. Our first contribution observes the diversity of topological hallucinations from major modern LLMs. Our second contribution is the proposal of a metric for the amplitude of such hallucinations: the Graph Atlas Distance, that is the average graph edit distance from several graphs in the graph atlas set. We compare this metric to the Hallucination Leaderboard, a hallucination rank that leverages 10,000 times more prompts to obtain its ranking.

Read more

9/4/2024