Local vs. Global Interpretability: A Computational Complexity Perspective

Overview

• This paper explores the computational complexity of local versus global interpretability in machine learning models.
• Local interpretability refers to explaining the reasoning for individual predictions, while global interpretability aims to explain the overall model behavior.
• The authors investigate the theoretical limitations and tradeoffs between these two types of interpretability.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines a fundamental tension in explainable AI (XAI) - the difference between explaining individual predictions made by a machine learning model (local interpretability) versus explaining the overall logic or behavior of the entire model (global interpretability).

Local interpretability is about understanding why a model made a particular decision for a specific input. This could involve highlighting the most important features that influenced the prediction. Global interpretability, on the other hand, is about comprehending the model's general decision-making process and the broader patterns it has learned.

The researchers show that achieving both types of interpretability simultaneously can be computationally very difficult. Providing detailed local explanations may require sacrificing the ability to succinctly capture the model's global structure. Conversely, aiming for a high-level understanding of the overall model may come at the cost of losing the ability to explain individual predictions in depth.

This trade-off between local and global interpretability has important implications for the design and evaluation of explainable AI systems. Developers often have to make tough choices about which form of interpretability to prioritize based on the specific use case and user needs.

Technical Explanation

The paper formally investigates the computational complexity of local versus global interpretability. The authors define a framework where a machine learning model's behavior is characterized by a target function mapping inputs to outputs.

They show that for certain families of target functions, providing detailed local explanations for individual predictions is computationally hard, even when the global structure of the model is relatively simple. Conversely, they demonstrate cases where the model's global behavior can be compactly described, but explaining individual predictions requires solving a computationally intractable problem.

These results establish fundamental tradeoffs and limitations in the pursuit of interpretable and explainable AI. The authors argue that these complexity-theoretic insights should inform the design of future XAI systems and the choice of interpretability methods applied in different application domains.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable theoretical contribution by rigorously analyzing the inherent tradeoffs between local and global interpretability. The complexity-theoretic results provide a solid foundation for understanding the fundamental limitations of achieving both forms of interpretability simultaneously.

That said, the analysis is limited to specific families of target functions and does not necessarily capture the full diversity of machine learning models encountered in practice. The authors acknowledge that real-world models may exhibit different patterns of complexity, and further research is needed to understand the implications in broader settings.

Additionally, the paper focuses solely on the computational complexity perspective and does not consider other important factors, such as the cognitive load on human users or the practical utility of different interpretability approaches. Ultimately, the choice of interpretability method should be guided by a holistic understanding of user needs, model characteristics, and the broader context of application.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to the field of interpretable and explainable AI by uncovering fundamental computational complexity tradeoffs between local and global interpretability. The insights gained can inform the design of future XAI systems and help researchers and practitioners make more informed choices about which form of interpretability to prioritize based on the specific requirements of their applications.

While the theoretical analysis provides a solid foundation, further research is needed to understand the practical implications and how these complexity-theoretic results translate to real-world machine learning models and user experiences. Nonetheless, this paper represents an important step forward in the quest for truly interpretable and transparent AI systems.