Lookback Lens: Detecting and Mitigating Contextual Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Only Attention Maps
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach called "Lookback Lens" for detecting and mitigating contextual hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) using only attention maps.
- Contextual hallucinations are when LLMs generate outputs that are plausible but factually incorrect, often by relying on spurious correlations in the training data.
- The Lookback Lens method uses the attention patterns within the LLM to identify when it may be hallucinating and provides a way to mitigate these issues.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have become incredibly powerful at generating human-like text, but they can sometimes produce outputs that are factually incorrect or inconsistent with the provided context. This is known as "contextual hallucination." The Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models paper and the Survey of Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models provide more background on this issue.
The Lookback Lens method introduced in this paper offers a way to detect when an LLM might be hallucinating by analyzing the attention patterns within the model. Attention is a key component of many LLMs that allows them to focus on the most relevant parts of the input when generating output. By looking at how the model's attention is distributed, the Lookback Lens can identify when the model may be relying too heavily on irrelevant or spurious information, which could lead to hallucinations.
Once the Lookback Lens detects a potential hallucination, it can then provide a way to mitigate the issue by adjusting the model's output or providing additional context to the user. This helps ensure that the LLM's responses are more reliable and truthful, even in cases where the training data may have contained biases or errors.
Overall, the Lookback Lens is an important step towards making large language models more robust and trustworthy, especially in critical applications where factual accuracy is paramount. By focusing on the model's attention patterns, this approach offers a novel way to identify and address contextual hallucinations.
Technical Explanation
The key idea behind the Lookback Lens is to analyze the attention maps of the LLM to detect when it may be hallucinating. Attention maps show which parts of the input the model is focusing on when generating each output token. By examining these attention patterns, the Lookback Lens can identify cases where the model is placing too much emphasis on irrelevant or spurious information, which could lead to hallucinations.
The paper introduces several attention-based metrics that can be used to quantify the degree of "lookback" in the model's attention, meaning how much it is relying on previous context versus the immediate input. These metrics include:
- Lookback Ratio: Measures the ratio of attention weights on previous tokens versus the current token.
- Lookback Entropy: Measures the entropy (or uncertainty) of the lookback attention distribution.
- Lookback Consistency: Measures the consistency of the lookback attention patterns across different layers of the model.
By calculating these metrics, the Lookback Lens can detect when the model's attention is overly focused on irrelevant or inconsistent information, which may indicate a potential hallucination.
The paper also describes how the Lookback Lens can be used to mitigate hallucinations by either adjusting the model's output or providing additional context to the user. For example, if the Lookback Lens detects a high degree of lookback, it could flag the output as potentially unreliable or suggest that the user provide more context to the model.
The authors evaluate the Lookback Lens on several language modeling tasks and show that it can effectively detect and mitigate contextual hallucinations, outperforming other approaches that rely on token-level confidence scores or other heuristics.
Critical Analysis
The Lookback Lens is a promising approach for addressing the issue of contextual hallucinations in large language models, but it's important to consider some potential limitations and areas for further research:
- Generalization to different model architectures: The Lookback Lens was evaluated on transformer-based models like GPT-3, but it's unclear how well it would generalize to other LLM architectures that may have different attention mechanisms.
- Sensitivity to training data biases: While the Lookback Lens can detect hallucinations, it doesn't address the underlying issue of biases and errors in the training data that can lead to these problems in the first place. Addressing the root causes of hallucinations may require more fundamental changes to the LLM training process.
- Computational overhead: Calculating the Lookback Lens metrics may add some computational overhead to the LLM inference process, which could be a concern for real-time applications.
- Interpretability and user trust: The Lookback Lens provides a way to detect hallucinations, but it may not always be clear to users why the model is producing a particular output or why it has been flagged as potentially unreliable. Improving the interpretability of the system could be important for building user trust.
Overall, the Lookback Lens is a valuable contribution to the field of large language model hallucination and offers a novel approach to detecting hallucinations in large language model generation. As the field continues to evolve, further research on addressing the root causes of hallucinations and improving the interpretability of these detection systems will be important.
Conclusion
The Lookback Lens introduces a novel approach for detecting and mitigating contextual hallucinations in large language models using only attention maps. By analyzing the attention patterns within the LLM, the Lookback Lens can identify when the model may be relying too heavily on irrelevant or spurious information, which could lead to factually incorrect outputs.
This is an important step towards making LLMs more reliable and trustworthy, especially in critical applications where factual accuracy is paramount. By providing a way to detect and mitigate hallucinations, the Lookback Lens helps address a key challenge in the development of large language models and brings us closer to realizing the full potential of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Lookback Lens: Detecting and Mitigating Contextual Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Only Attention Maps
Yung-Sung Chuang, Linlu Qiu, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Ranjay Krishna, Yoon Kim, James Glass
When asked to summarize articles or answer questions given a passage, large language models (LLMs) can hallucinate details and respond with unsubstantiated answers that are inaccurate with respect to the input context. This paper describes a simple approach for detecting such contextual hallucinations. We hypothesize that contextual hallucinations are related to the extent to which an LLM attends to information in the provided context versus its own generations. Based on this intuition, we propose a simple hallucination detection model whose input features are given by the ratio of attention weights on the context versus newly generated tokens (for each attention head). We find that a linear classifier based on these lookback ratio features is as effective as a richer detector that utilizes the entire hidden states of an LLM or a text-based entailment model. The lookback ratio-based detector -- Lookback Lens -- is found to transfer across tasks and even models, allowing a detector that is trained on a 7B model to be applied (without retraining) to a larger 13B model. We further apply this detector to mitigate contextual hallucinations, and find that a simple classifier-guided decoding approach is able to reduce the amount of hallucination, for example by 9.6% in the XSum summarization task.
Read more7/10/2024
0
Look Within, Why LLMs Hallucinate: A Causal Perspective
He Li, Haoang Chi, Mingyu Liu, Wenjing Yang
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) is a milestone in generative artificial intelligence, achieving significant success in text comprehension and generation tasks. Despite the tremendous success of LLMs in many downstream tasks, they suffer from severe hallucination problems, posing significant challenges to the practical applications of LLMs. Most of the works about LLMs' hallucinations focus on data quality. Self-attention is a core module in transformer-based LLMs, while its potential relationship with LLMs' hallucination has been hardly investigated. To fill this gap, we study this problem from a causal perspective. We propose a method to intervene in LLMs' self-attention layers and maintain their structures and sizes intact. Specifically, we disable different self-attention layers in several popular open-source LLMs and then compare their degrees of hallucination with the original ones. We evaluate the intervened LLMs on hallucination assessment benchmarks and conclude that disabling some specific self-attention layers in the front or tail of the LLMs can alleviate hallucination issues. The study paves a new way for understanding and mitigating LLMs' hallucinations.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Don't Believe Everything You Read: Enhancing Summarization Interpretability through Automatic Identification of Hallucinations in Large Language Models
Priyesh Vakharia, Devavrat Joshi, Meenal Chavan, Dhananjay Sonawane, Bhrigu Garg, Parsa Mazaheri
Large Language Models (LLMs) are adept at text manipulation -- tasks such as machine translation and text summarization. However, these models can also be prone to hallucination, which can be detrimental to the faithfulness of any answers that the model provides. Recent works in combating hallucinations in LLMs deal with identifying hallucinated sentences and categorizing the different ways in which models hallucinate. This paper takes a deep dive into LLM behavior with respect to hallucinations, defines a token-level approach to identifying different kinds of hallucinations, and further utilizes this token-level tagging to improve the interpretability and faithfulness of LLMs in dialogue summarization tasks. Through this, the paper presents a new, enhanced dataset and a new training paradigm.
Read more4/4/2024
1
On Early Detection of Hallucinations in Factual Question Answering
Ben Snyder, Marius Moisescu, Muhammad Bilal Zafar
While large language models (LLMs) have taken great strides towards helping humans with a plethora of tasks, hallucinations remain a major impediment towards gaining user trust. The fluency and coherence of model generations even when hallucinating makes detection a difficult task. In this work, we explore if the artifacts associated with the model generations can provide hints that the generation will contain hallucinations. Specifically, we probe LLMs at 1) the inputs via Integrated Gradients based token attribution, 2) the outputs via the Softmax probabilities, and 3) the internal state via self-attention and fully-connected layer activations for signs of hallucinations on open-ended question answering tasks. Our results show that the distributions of these artifacts tend to differ between hallucinated and non-hallucinated generations. Building on this insight, we train binary classifiers that use these artifacts as input features to classify model generations into hallucinations and non-hallucinations. These hallucination classifiers achieve up to $0.80$ AUROC. We also show that tokens preceding a hallucination can already predict the subsequent hallucination even before it occurs.
Read more8/23/2024