Low Variance Off-policy Evaluation with State-based Importance Sampling

Overview

• Reinforcement learning often requires trying out suboptimal policies, which can be costly in many domains.
• Off-policy evaluation can be used to evaluate a target policy based on data collected from a known behavior policy.
• Importance sampling estimators are used to weight the trajectory based on the probability ratio of the target and behavior policies, but these have high variance.
• This paper proposes state-based importance sampling estimators that reduce variance by dropping certain states from the importance weight calculation.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning is a powerful technique used to train AI systems, but it can be expensive in real-world applications. This is because the AI needs to try out different strategies, even if they aren't the best ones, in order to learn. This can be problematic in domains where trying suboptimal policies is costly.

To address this, researchers use off-policy evaluation, which allows them to evaluate a desired policy (the "target policy") based on data collected from a different policy (the "behavior policy") that was used during training. They do this using importance sampling estimators, which weight the data based on the probability of the target policy versus the behavior policy.

Unfortunately, these importance sampling estimators tend to have high variance, meaning the results can be quite variable and unreliable. This is a common issue in reinforcement learning optimization techniques.

The key innovation in this paper is the introduction of state-based importance sampling estimators. These new estimators reduce the variance by selectively dropping certain states from the importance weight calculation. The authors demonstrate how this technique can be applied to several different off-policy evaluation methods, consistently improving the accuracy compared to the traditional approaches.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes state-based variants of several important off-policy evaluation methods, including ordinary importance sampling, weighted importance sampling, per-decision importance sampling, incremental importance sampling, doubly robust off-policy evaluation, and stationary density ratio estimation.

The core idea is to reduce the variance of the importance sampling estimator by dropping certain states from the calculation of the importance weight. This is based on the insight that not all states contribute equally to the variance of the estimator. By selectively ignoring certain states, the authors are able to significantly reduce the variance while still maintaining an unbiased estimate.

The authors evaluate their state-based methods across four different domains, including simulated robotics tasks and a real-world dialogue system. The results consistently show that the state-based estimators outperform their traditional counterparts in terms of reduced variance and improved accuracy.

This approach of adaptively selecting which states to use in the importance weight calculation is related to other variance reduction techniques in reinforcement learning, such as clustered policy decision ranking and policy optimization with learned guidance from state information.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the state-based importance sampling estimators, including proofs of their unbiasedness and variance properties. However, the authors acknowledge that the practical implementation may require tuning certain hyperparameters, such as the threshold for dropping states, which could introduce additional complexity.

Additionally, the paper only evaluates the methods on a relatively small number of domains. While the consistent performance improvements are promising, it would be valuable to see how the state-based estimators scale to larger, more complex environments. There is also prior work on high-probability sample complexity bounds for policy evaluation in linear function approximation settings that could provide further insight.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in reducing the high variance inherent in importance sampling-based off-policy evaluation. The state-based approach is a clever and effective solution, and the authors have done a commendable job of rigorously analyzing its theoretical properties and demonstrating its practical efficacy.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel class of state-based importance sampling estimators for off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. By selectively dropping certain states from the importance weight calculation, the authors are able to significantly reduce the variance of the estimates without introducing bias.

The state-based methods are shown to outperform traditional importance sampling estimators across a variety of domains, suggesting they could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working on reinforcement learning problems with high-cost exploration. The techniques proposed in this paper represent an important advancement in the field of off-policy evaluation, which is crucial for applying reinforcement learning to real-world applications.