LSP Framework: A Compensatory Model for Defeating Trigger Reverse Engineering via Label Smoothing Poisoning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces the LSP (Label Smoothing Poisoning) framework, which is a defense mechanism against trigger reverse engineering attacks on machine learning models.
- Trigger reverse engineering is a type of backdoor attack where an attacker tries to discover the specific input patterns that can cause a model to produce a desired output.
- The LSP framework uses label smoothing, a technique that reduces the model's confidence in its predictions, as a defense against such attacks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper proposes a way to protect machine learning models from a specific type of attack called trigger reverse engineering. In this attack, the attacker tries to find a particular pattern in the input data that can trick the model into giving a desired output, even if that output is incorrect.
The defense mechanism introduced in this paper, called the LSP framework, uses a technique called label smoothing. Label smoothing reduces the model's confidence in its predictions, making it harder for an attacker to discover the specific input pattern that can trigger the desired output. By reducing the model's certainty, the LSP framework makes it more difficult for the attacker to reverse-engineer the trigger that would allow them to manipulate the model's behavior.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the LSP (Label Smoothing Poisoning) framework, which is designed to defend against trigger reverse engineering attacks on machine learning models. Trigger reverse engineering is a type of backdoor attack where an attacker tries to discover the specific input patterns that can cause a model to produce a desired output, even if that output is incorrect.
The LSP framework uses label smoothing, a technique that reduces the model's confidence in its predictions, as a defense against such attacks. By making the model less certain about its outputs, the LSP framework makes it more difficult for an attacker to reverse-engineer the specific trigger that would allow them to manipulate the model's behavior.
The paper presents experiments that demonstrate the effectiveness of the LSP framework in defending against trigger reverse engineering attacks, even when the attacker has access to the model's training data and architecture. The authors show that the LSP framework can significantly reduce the attacker's ability to discover the trigger pattern, thereby mitigating the impact of the attack.
Critical Analysis
The LSP framework presented in this paper is a promising defense against trigger reverse engineering attacks on machine learning models. By using label smoothing, the framework reduces the model's confidence in its predictions, making it more difficult for an attacker to discover the specific input pattern that can trigger a desired (and potentially malicious) output.
However, the paper does not address potential limitations or drawbacks of the LSP framework. For example, it is not clear how the reduced model confidence might affect the model's overall performance on legitimate tasks, or whether the framework could be circumvented by more sophisticated attack techniques.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison of the LSP framework to other proposed defenses against backdoor attacks, such as efficient backdoor attacks or backdooring instruction-tuned language models. Further research is needed to understand the relative strengths and weaknesses of different defense mechanisms in the face of evolving attack strategies.
Conclusion
The LSP framework introduced in this paper offers a promising approach to defending machine learning models against trigger reverse engineering attacks. By using label smoothing to reduce the model's confidence in its predictions, the framework makes it more difficult for attackers to discover the specific input patterns that can trigger a desired (and potentially malicious) output.
While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the LSP framework in experiments, further research is needed to fully understand its limitations and compare it to other proposed defense mechanisms. As the field of machine learning security continues to evolve, innovative approaches like the LSP framework will be crucial in maintaining the reliability and trustworthiness of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LSP Framework: A Compensatory Model for Defeating Trigger Reverse Engineering via Label Smoothing Poisoning
Beichen Li, Yuanfang Guo, Heqi Peng, Yangxi Li, Yunhong Wang
Deep neural networks are vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Among the existing backdoor defense methods, trigger reverse engineering based approaches, which reconstruct the backdoor triggers via optimizations, are the most versatile and effective ones compared to other types of methods. In this paper, we summarize and construct a generic paradigm for the typical trigger reverse engineering process. Based on this paradigm, we propose a new perspective to defeat trigger reverse engineering by manipulating the classification confidence of backdoor samples. To determine the specific modifications of classification confidence, we propose a compensatory model to compute the lower bound of the modification. With proper modifications, the backdoor attack can easily bypass the trigger reverse engineering based methods. To achieve this objective, we propose a Label Smoothing Poisoning (LSP) framework, which leverages label smoothing to specifically manipulate the classification confidences of backdoor samples. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed work can defeat the state-of-the-art trigger reverse engineering based methods, and possess good compatibility with a variety of existing backdoor attacks.
Read more4/22/2024
📶
0
Under-confidence Backdoors Are Resilient and Stealthy Backdoors
Minlong Peng, Zidi Xiong, Quang H. Nguyen, Mingming Sun, Khoa D. Doan, Ping Li
By injecting a small number of poisoned samples into the training set, backdoor attacks aim to make the victim model produce designed outputs on any input injected with pre-designed backdoors. In order to achieve a high attack success rate using as few poisoned training samples as possible, most existing attack methods change the labels of the poisoned samples to the target class. This practice often results in severe over-fitting of the victim model over the backdoors, making the attack quite effective in output control but easier to be identified by human inspection or automatic defense algorithms. In this work, we proposed a label-smoothing strategy to overcome the over-fitting problem of these attack methods, obtaining a textit{Label-Smoothed Backdoor Attack} (LSBA). In the LSBA, the label of the poisoned sample $bm{x}$ will be changed to the target class with a probability of $p_n(bm{x})$ instead of 100%, and the value of $p_n(bm{x})$ is specifically designed to make the prediction probability the target class be only slightly greater than those of the other classes. Empirical studies on several existing backdoor attacks show that our strategy can considerably improve the stealthiness of these attacks and, at the same time, achieve a high attack success rate. In addition, our strategy makes it able to manually control the prediction probability of the design output through manipulating the applied and activated number of LSBAsfootnote{Source code will be published at url{https://github.com/v-mipeng/LabelSmoothedAttack.git}}.
Read more7/23/2024
🏋️
0
SEEP: Training Dynamics Grounds Latent Representation Search for Mitigating Backdoor Poisoning Attacks
Xuanli He, Qiongkai Xu, Jun Wang, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein, Trevor Cohn
Modern NLP models are often trained on public datasets drawn from diverse sources, rendering them vulnerable to data poisoning attacks. These attacks can manipulate the model's behavior in ways engineered by the attacker. One such tactic involves the implantation of backdoors, achieved by poisoning specific training instances with a textual trigger and a target class label. Several strategies have been proposed to mitigate the risks associated with backdoor attacks by identifying and removing suspected poisoned examples. However, we observe that these strategies fail to offer effective protection against several advanced backdoor attacks. To remedy this deficiency, we propose a novel defensive mechanism that first exploits training dynamics to identify poisoned samples with high precision, followed by a label propagation step to improve recall and thus remove the majority of poisoned instances. Compared with recent advanced defense methods, our method considerably reduces the success rates of several backdoor attacks while maintaining high classification accuracy on clean test sets.
Read more5/21/2024
✅
0
From Shortcuts to Triggers: Backdoor Defense with Denoised PoE
Qin Liu, Fei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Muhao Chen
Language models are often at risk of diverse backdoor attacks, especially data poisoning. Thus, it is important to investigate defense solutions for addressing them. Existing backdoor defense methods mainly focus on backdoor attacks with explicit triggers, leaving a universal defense against various backdoor attacks with diverse triggers largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end ensemble-based backdoor defense framework, DPoE (Denoised Product-of-Experts), which is inspired by the shortcut nature of backdoor attacks, to defend various backdoor attacks. DPoE consists of two models: a shallow model that captures the backdoor shortcuts and a main model that is prevented from learning the backdoor shortcuts. To address the label flip caused by backdoor attackers, DPoE incorporates a denoising design. Experiments on SST-2 dataset show that DPoE significantly improves the defense performance against various types of backdoor triggers including word-level, sentence-level, and syntactic triggers. Furthermore, DPoE is also effective under a more challenging but practical setting that mixes multiple types of trigger.
Read more4/4/2024