MACM: Utilizing a Multi-Agent System for Condition Mining in Solving Complex Mathematical Problems
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel Multi-Agent Condition Mining (MACM) system for solving complex mathematical problems.
- The MACM system utilizes a multi-agent approach to efficiently explore and identify the key conditions required for solving mathematical problems.
- The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of MACM on a range of challenging mathematical tasks, showcasing its ability to outperform traditional problem-solving methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new system called MACM (Multi-Agent Condition Mining) that can help solve complex mathematical problems. The key idea is to use multiple "agents" or software programs that work together to explore and identify the important conditions or requirements needed to solve a given mathematical problem.
Traditionally, solving complex math problems has been a challenging task, often requiring extensive human expertise and effort. The MACM system aims to make this process more efficient by dividing the problem-solving task among multiple intelligent agents, each focusing on a different aspect of the problem.
These agents work collaboratively, sharing insights and collectively refining their understanding of the problem's conditions. By leveraging this multi-agent approach, the system is able to more effectively explore the solution space and discover the critical elements needed to solve the problem.
The paper demonstrates how MACM can outperform previous methods on a variety of complex mathematical problems. This suggests that the MACM system could be a valuable tool for mathematicians, scientists, and researchers who frequently encounter challenging mathematical tasks in their work.
Technical Explanation
The MACM system is designed as a multi-agent framework, where each agent focuses on a specific aspect of the problem-solving process. These agents collaborate by sharing their findings and collectively refining their understanding of the problem's conditions.
The key components of the MACM system include:
- Condition Exploration Agents: These agents are responsible for systematically exploring the space of possible problem conditions, leveraging techniques like meta-prompting and soft prompting to efficiently navigate the solution space.
- Condition Evaluation Agents: These agents assess the viability of the conditions identified by the exploration agents, using techniques like large language model-based automated reasoning to validate the conditions against the problem statement.
- Condition Refinement Agents: These agents iteratively refine the identified conditions, using multi-agent collaboration and tuning to enhance the overall problem-solving capabilities of the system.
The paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the MACM system on a range of challenging mathematical problems, demonstrating its ability to outperform traditional problem-solving methods. The results highlight the advantages of the multi-agent approach in efficiently exploring and identifying the critical conditions needed to solve complex mathematical problems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling demonstration of the MACM system's capabilities, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
- Scalability: While the multi-agent approach shows promise, the authors note that scaling the system to handle increasingly complex problems may require additional architectural and algorithmic developments.
- Interpretability: The authors mention that the inner workings of the MACM system can be somewhat opaque, making it challenging to fully understand the reasoning behind the identified conditions. Improving the interpretability of the system could enhance its usability and trustworthiness.
- Generalization: The paper focuses on a specific set of mathematical problems, and further research is needed to assess the MACM system's ability to generalize to a wider range of mathematical domains and problem types.
Additionally, enhancing the general capabilities of the underlying language models used within the MACM system could potentially lead to even more robust and versatile problem-solving abilities.
Conclusion
The MACM system presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of automated mathematical problem-solving. By leveraging a multi-agent approach, the system is able to efficiently explore and identify the critical conditions required to solve complex mathematical problems, outperforming traditional methods.
The paper's findings suggest that the MACM system could be a valuable tool for researchers, mathematicians, and scientists working on challenging mathematical tasks. While the system has some limitations that warrant further research, the authors have demonstrated the potential of this multi-agent approach to transform the way we tackle complex mathematical problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
MACM: Utilizing a Multi-Agent System for Condition Mining in Solving Complex Mathematical Problems
Bin Lei, Yi Zhang, Shan Zuo, Ali Payani, Caiwen Ding
Recent advancements in large language models, such as GPT-4, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in processing standard queries. Despite these advancements, their performance substantially declines in textbf{advanced mathematical problems requiring complex, multi-step logical reasoning}. To enhance their inferential capabilities, current research has delved into textit{prompting engineering}, exemplified by methodologies such as the Tree of Thought and Graph of Thought. Nonetheless, these existing approaches encounter two significant limitations. Firstly, their effectiveness in tackling complex mathematical problems is somewhat constrained. Secondly, the necessity to design distinct prompts for individual problems hampers their generalizability. In response to these limitations, this paper introduces the textit{Multi-Agent System for conditional Mining} (textbf{MACM}) prompting method. It not only resolves intricate mathematical problems but also demonstrates strong generalization capabilities across various mathematical contexts. With the assistance of MACM, the accuracy of GPT-4 Turbo on the most challenging level five mathematical problems in the MATH dataset increase from $mathbf{54.68%} text{ to } mathbf{76.73%}$. The code is available in url{https://github.com/bin123apple/MACM}.
Read more7/24/2024
0
MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQL
Bing Wang, Changyu Ren, Jian Yang, Xinnian Liang, Jiaqi Bai, Linzheng Chai, Zhao Yan, Qian-Wen Zhang, Di Yin, Xing Sun, Zhoujun Li
Recent LLM-based Text-to-SQL methods usually suffer from significant performance degradation on huge databases and complex user questions that require multi-step reasoning. Moreover, most existing methods neglect the crucial significance of LLMs utilizing external tools and model collaboration. To address these challenges, we introduce MAC-SQL, a novel LLM-based multi-agent collaborative framework. Our framework comprises a core decomposer agent for Text-to-SQL generation with few-shot chain-of-thought reasoning, accompanied by two auxiliary agents that utilize external tools or models to acquire smaller sub-databases and refine erroneous SQL queries. The decomposer agent collaborates with auxiliary agents, which are activated as needed and can be expanded to accommodate new features or tools for effective Text-to-SQL parsing. In our framework, We initially leverage GPT-4 as the strong backbone LLM for all agent tasks to determine the upper bound of our framework. We then fine-tune an open-sourced instruction-followed model, SQL-Llama, by leveraging Code Llama 7B, to accomplish all tasks as GPT-4 does. Experiments show that SQL-Llama achieves a comparable execution accuracy of 43.94, compared to the baseline accuracy of 46.35 for vanilla GPT-4. At the time of writing, MAC-SQL+GPT-4 achieves an execution accuracy of 59.59 when evaluated on the BIRD benchmark, establishing a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) on its holdout test set (https://github.com/wbbeyourself/MAC-SQL).
Read more6/18/2024
0
CoMM: Collaborative Multi-Agent, Multi-Reasoning-Path Prompting for Complex Problem Solving
Pei Chen, Boran Han, Shuai Zhang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great ability in solving traditional natural language tasks and elementary reasoning tasks with appropriate prompting techniques. However, their ability is still limited in solving complicated science problems. In this work, we aim to push the upper bound of the reasoning capability of LLMs by proposing a collaborative multi-agent, multi-reasoning-path (CoMM) prompting framework. Specifically, we prompt LLMs to play different roles in a problem-solving team, and encourage different role-play agents to collaboratively solve the target task. In particular, we discover that applying different reasoning paths for different roles is an effective strategy to implement few-shot prompting approaches in the multi-agent scenarios. Empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods on two college-level science problems over competitive baselines. Our further analysis shows the necessity of prompting LLMs to play different roles or experts independently. We release the code at: https://github.com/amazon-science/comm-prompt
Read more4/30/2024
0
Robustness Assessment of Mathematical Reasoning in the Presence of Missing and Contradictory Conditions
Shi-Yu Tian, Zhi Zhou, Lin-Han Jia, Lan-Zhe Guo, Yu-Feng Li
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on reasoning tasks, which can be further improved through few-shot prompting techniques. However, the current evaluation primarily focuses on carefully constructed benchmarks and neglects the consideration of real-world reasoning problems that present missing and contradictory conditions, known as ill-defined problems. Our observations suggest that existing few-shot prompting techniques are ineffective in such scenarios, often providing overconfident answers or hallucination. To further study this problem, we develop a benchmark called Problems with Missing and Contradictory conditions (PMC) and introduce two novel metrics to evaluate the performance of few-shot prompting methods in these scenarios. Our analysis using the PMC benchmark reveals a trade-off dilemma between the performance of mathematical reasoning for well-defined problems and the ability to recognize ill-defined problems. To address the challenges posed by PMC, we propose a novel few-shot prompting method called SMT-LIB Prompting (SLP), which utilizes the SMT-LIB language to model the problems instead of solving them directly. Subsequently, a double-check solving strategy checks the satisfiability and uniqueness of the solution and provides final feedback. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our SLP approach compared to existing few-shot prompting methods when dealing with problems with missing and contradictory conditions. We will open-source our benchmark and code to facilitate future research.
Read more6/10/2024