MedVH: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Hallucination for Large Vision Language Models in the Medical Context

Overview

• This paper introduces MedVH, a new dataset and benchmarks for systematically evaluating hallucination in large vision-language models in the medical context.
• Hallucination refers to the phenomenon where these models generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect responses.
• The authors argue that existing hallucination benchmarks do not capture the unique challenges of the medical domain, motivating the creation of MedVH.
• MedVH includes a diverse set of medical images and questions that require models to reason about visual information, medical knowledge, and language understanding.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new dataset and set of tests called MedVH that are designed to evaluate how well large AI models that work with both text and images can handle the unique challenges of the medical field. These models, known as vision-language models, can sometimes generate responses that sound plausible but are actually incorrect or made up - a phenomenon called "hallucination."

The authors felt that existing hallucination benchmarks didn't capture the specific difficulties of the medical domain, so they created MedVH. This dataset includes a variety of medical images and questions that require the models to draw on both visual information and medical knowledge, as well as strong language understanding skills. By testing the models on this more specialized dataset, the researchers hope to get a better sense of how well these systems can handle real-world medical scenarios without hallucinating incorrect information.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces MedVH: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Hallucination for Large Vision Language Models in the Medical Context, a new dataset and benchmark for evaluating hallucination in large vision-language models in the medical domain.

The authors argue that existing hallucination benchmarks, such as A Survey of Hallucination in Large Language Models and MedThink: Inducing Medical Knowledge in Large-Scale Visual-Language Models, do not capture the unique challenges of the medical context. To address this, they create MedVH, which includes a diverse set of medical images and questions that require models to reason about visual information, medical knowledge, and language understanding.

The MedVH dataset is constructed by scraping a large corpus of medical images and associated captions from the web. The authors then manually curate a set of questions that target different aspects of medical understanding, such as anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. These questions are paired with the relevant medical images to create the final benchmark.

The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art vision-language models on the MedVH dataset, including Visual Hallucinations in Multi-Modal Large Language Models and A Hallucination Benchmark for Medical Visual Question Answering. Their results show that these models struggle to provide accurate and factual responses, particularly on questions that require a deep understanding of medical concepts.

Critical Analysis

The MedVH dataset and benchmarks presented in this paper are a valuable contribution to the field of large vision-language models, particularly in the medical domain. The authors rightly identify the limitations of existing hallucination evaluation frameworks and the need for more specialized benchmarks that capture the unique challenges of medical reasoning.

One potential caveat is the reliance on web-scraped data for the MedVH dataset. While this approach allows for the creation of a diverse and large-scale benchmark, there may be biases or inconsistencies in the source material that could affect the validity of the results. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore more curated medical datasets.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the underlying causes of hallucination in the evaluated models. Further research is needed to understand the specific vulnerabilities of these systems and develop more robust approaches to mitigate hallucination, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare.

Overall, this paper lays important groundwork for the systematic evaluation of hallucination in medical vision-language models, and the MedVH dataset and benchmarks are a valuable resource for the broader research community.

Conclusion

The MedVH: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Hallucination for Large Vision Language Models in the Medical Context paper introduces a new dataset and set of benchmarks for evaluating hallucination in large vision-language models in the medical context. The authors argue that existing hallucination evaluation frameworks do not capture the unique challenges of the medical domain, and they create MedVH to address this gap.

By testing state-of-the-art models on MedVH, the researchers find that these systems struggle to provide accurate and factual responses, particularly on questions that require a deep understanding of medical concepts. This work highlights the need for more specialized benchmarks and advanced techniques to mitigate hallucination, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare. The MedVH dataset and benchmarks provide a valuable resource for the broader research community to advance the development of reliable and trustworthy vision-language models for medical applications.