MIDGARD: Self-Consistency Using Minimum Description Length for Structured Commonsense Reasoning

Overview

• The paper explores the task of conducting structured reasoning by generating a reasoning graph from natural language input using large language models (LLMs).
• Previous approaches have suffered from error propagation due to the autoregressive nature and single-pass-based decoding, which lack error correction capability.
• The paper proposes a new method called MIDGARD (MInimum Description length Guided Aggregation of Reasoning in Directed acyclic graph) that leverages Minimum Description Length (MDL)-based formulation to identify consistent properties among different graph samples generated by an LLM.
• The method demonstrates superior performance compared to other approaches across various structured reasoning tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful tools that can understand and generate human-like text. Researchers have explored using LLMs to perform structured reasoning, where the goal is to extract a graph-like representation of the reasoning process from natural language input.

Previous methods for this task have had some issues. They often generate reasoning graphs in a single pass, which can lead to errors that build up and get worse as the graph is created. Additionally, relying on just a single sample of the reasoning graph can cause important elements to be missed.

To address these problems, the researchers in this paper draw inspiration from a technique called "self-consistency" (SC). SC involves generating multiple samples of the reasoning graph and then combining them to get a more accurate final result.

The key innovation in this paper is a new method called MIDGARD that uses a mathematical technique called "Minimum Description Length" (MDL) to identify the most consistent elements across the different graph samples. This helps filter out parts of the graph that are likely to be incorrect, while also filling in missing elements without compromising the overall accuracy.

The researchers show that MIDGARD outperforms other methods across a variety of structured reasoning tasks, such as argument structure extraction, explanation graph generation, and inferring dependencies among actions for everyday tasks. This suggests that their approach is a promising way to enable LLMs to engage in more robust and reliable structured reasoning.

Technical Explanation

The paper tackles the challenge of conducting structured reasoning using large language models (LLMs). The goal is to generate a reasoning graph, which is a graphical representation of the reasoning process, from natural language input.

Previous approaches have explored various prompting schemes, but they suffer from error propagation due to the autoregressive nature and single-pass-based decoding of LLMs. This means that mistakes made early in the process can get amplified as the reasoning graph is constructed, and the models lack the ability to correct these errors.

To address this, the researchers draw inspiration from the concept of self-consistency (SC), which involves generating multiple samples of the reasoning graph and then combining them to get a more accurate final result. However, applying SC to generated graphs poses a substantial challenge.

The researchers propose a new method called MIDGARD (MInimum Description length Guided Aggregation of Reasoning in Directed acyclic graph) that leverages Minimum Description Length (MDL) to identify consistent properties among the different graph samples. The MDL-based formulation helps reject properties that appear in only a few samples, which are likely to be erroneous, while enabling the inclusion of missing elements without compromising precision.

The experimental results show that MIDGARD outperforms other methods across a range of structured reasoning tasks, including argument structure extraction, explanation graph generation, inferring dependency relations among actions for everyday tasks, and semantic graph generation from natural texts.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to enabling large language models (LLMs) to perform more robust and reliable structured reasoning. The MIDGARD method's ability to identify consistent properties across multiple graph samples and filter out likely erroneous elements is a significant advancement over previous techniques.

However, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity and scalability of the MIDGARD approach. As the size and complexity of the reasoning graphs increase, the process of aggregating and analyzing multiple samples could become computationally intensive. The researchers may need to explore ways to optimize the algorithm or develop approximation techniques to make the method more practical for larger-scale applications.

Additionally, the paper focuses on evaluating MIDGARD on specific structured reasoning tasks, but it does not provide a broader analysis of its generalization capabilities. It would be valuable to understand how well the method performs on a wider range of reasoning tasks and whether the benefits observed in the reported experiments extend to other domains.

Finally, the paper does not delve into the potential biases or limitations of the LLMs used in the MIDGARD framework. As with any machine learning-based approach, it is essential to consider the potential for these models to perpetuate or amplify societal biases present in the training data. Further research may be needed to investigate the fairness and robustness of the MIDGARD method in real-world applications.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel approach called MIDGARD that addresses the limitations of previous methods for conducting structured reasoning using large language models (LLMs). By leveraging Minimum Description Length (MDL) to identify consistent properties across multiple graph samples, MIDGARD demonstrates superior performance on a variety of structured reasoning tasks, including argument structure extraction, explanation graph generation, and semantic graph generation.

This research represents a significant step forward in enabling LLMs to engage in more robust and reliable structured reasoning, which has important implications for a wide range of applications, such as knowledge-guided decision making, language understanding, and task planning. While the paper raises some questions about the scalability and generalization of the MIDGARD approach, the overall findings suggest that this is a promising direction for further research and development in the field of structured reasoning with large language models.