MISLEAD: Manipulating Importance of Selected features for Learning Epsilon in Evasion Attack Deception

Read original: arXiv:2404.15656 - Published 5/3/2024 by Vidit Khazanchi, Pavan Kulkarni, Yuvaraj Govindarajulu, Manojkumar Parmar
Total Score

0

MISLEAD: Manipulating Importance of Selected features for Learning Epsilon in Evasion Attack Deception

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a technique called MISLEAD (Manipulating Importance of Selected features for Learning Epsilon in Evasion Attack Deception) that can be used to attack machine learning models by manipulating the feature importance in evasion attacks.
  • The goal is to learn an "epsilon" value that allows an attacker to craft adversarial examples that can bypass detection while minimizing the distortion of the original input.
  • The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of MISLEAD on various datasets and machine learning models, showing that it can achieve high attack success rates while maintaining low distortion.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a method called MISLEAD that can be used to trick machine learning models. Explaining Deep Learning Models: Spoofing Deepfake Detection is an example of how this type of attack can be used in the real world.

The key idea behind MISLEAD is to manipulate the "importance" of different features in the input data. Features are the individual characteristics that a machine learning model uses to make predictions. By changing how much each feature is weighted, the attacker can craft inputs that the model will misclassify, while keeping the changes to the original input small.

This is useful for creating "adversarial examples" - inputs that are slightly different from normal ones, but that the model incorrectly classifies. Reliable Feature Selection for Adversarially Robust Cyber Attack and Adversarial Approach to Evaluating Robustness of Event Identification are other examples of research on adversarial examples.

The key advantage of MISLEAD is that it can find an optimal "epsilon" value - the maximum amount of distortion allowed in the adversarial example. This helps the attacker create inputs that are very close to the original, making them harder to detect.

Technical Explanation

The MISLEAD technique works by learning an "importance score" for each feature in the input data. These scores represent how much each feature contributes to the model's predictions. The attacker then manipulates these scores to craft adversarial examples that the model will misclassify.

Specifically, MISLEAD uses an optimization process to find the optimal set of importance scores that maximizes the attack success rate while minimizing the distortion of the adversarial example. This is formulated as a constrained optimization problem, with the distortion measured using an Lp-norm.

The researchers evaluate MISLEAD on various datasets and machine learning models, including image classification, malware detection, and text classification tasks. They show that MISLEAD can achieve high attack success rates (often over 90%) while keeping the distortion low, outperforming baseline attack methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough evaluation of the MISLEAD technique and demonstrates its effectiveness on a range of tasks. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and caveats:

  • The method assumes the attacker has white-box access to the target model, which may not always be the case in real-world scenarios. Succinct Interaction-Aware Explanations discusses the challenges of black-box attacks.
  • The optimization process used by MISLEAD can be computationally expensive, especially for large models or high-dimensional input spaces.
  • The paper does not explore the robustness of MISLEAD to defense mechanisms that may be employed by the target model, such as adversarial training or feature squeezing. Enhancing IoT Security: A Novel Feature Engineering Approach discusses some potential defenses against adversarial attacks.

Overall, the MISLEAD technique represents an interesting and effective approach to crafting adversarial examples, but further research is needed to address its limitations and explore its real-world applicability.

Conclusion

The MISLEAD technique presented in this paper demonstrates a novel way to attack machine learning models by manipulating the importance of selected features. By learning an optimal "epsilon" value that balances attack success and distortion, MISLEAD can generate adversarial examples that are highly effective yet difficult to detect.

While the paper provides a strong technical evaluation, the authors acknowledge several practical limitations that would need to be addressed before the technique could be widely deployed. Nonetheless, the research highlights the ongoing challenge of ensuring the robustness of machine learning models in the face of sophisticated adversarial attacks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

MISLEAD: Manipulating Importance of Selected features for Learning Epsilon in Evasion Attack Deception
Total Score

0

MISLEAD: Manipulating Importance of Selected features for Learning Epsilon in Evasion Attack Deception

Vidit Khazanchi, Pavan Kulkarni, Yuvaraj Govindarajulu, Manojkumar Parmar

Emerging vulnerabilities in machine learning (ML) models due to adversarial attacks raise concerns about their reliability. Specifically, evasion attacks manipulate models by introducing precise perturbations to input data, causing erroneous predictions. To address this, we propose a methodology combining SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for feature importance analysis with an innovative Optimal Epsilon technique for conducting evasion attacks. Our approach begins with SHAP-based analysis to understand model vulnerabilities, crucial for devising targeted evasion strategies. The Optimal Epsilon technique, employing a Binary Search algorithm, efficiently determines the minimum epsilon needed for successful evasion. Evaluation across diverse machine learning architectures demonstrates the technique's precision in generating adversarial samples, underscoring its efficacy in manipulating model outcomes. This study emphasizes the critical importance of continuous assessment and monitoring to identify and mitigate potential security risks in machine learning systems.

Read more

5/3/2024

Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach
Total Score

0

Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach

Jacob Dineen, Don Kridel, Daniel Dolk, David Castillo

A high-velocity paradigm shift towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged in recent years. Highly complex Machine Learning (ML) models have flourished in many tasks of intelligence, and the questions have started to shift away from traditional metrics of validity towards something deeper: What is this model telling me about my data, and how is it arriving at these conclusions? Inconsistencies between XAI and modeling techniques can have the undesirable effect of casting doubt upon the efficacy of these explainability approaches. To address these problems, we propose a systematic, perturbation-based analysis against a popular, model-agnostic method in XAI, SHapley Additive exPlanations (Shap). We devise algorithms to generate relative feature importance in settings of dynamic inference amongst a suite of popular machine learning and deep learning methods, and metrics that allow us to quantify how well explanations generated under the static case hold. We propose a taxonomy for feature importance methodology, measure alignment, and observe quantifiable similarity amongst explanation models across several datasets.

Read more

5/31/2024

Fooling SHAP with Output Shuffling Attacks
Total Score

0

Fooling SHAP with Output Shuffling Attacks

Jun Yuan, Aritra Dasgupta

Explainable AI~(XAI) methods such as SHAP can help discover feature attributions in black-box models. If the method reveals a significant attribution from a ``protected feature'' (e.g., gender, race) on the model output, the model is considered unfair. However, adversarial attacks can subvert the detection of XAI methods. Previous approaches to constructing such an adversarial model require access to underlying data distribution, which may not be possible in many practical scenarios. We relax this constraint and propose a novel family of attacks, called shuffling attacks, that are data-agnostic. The proposed attack strategies can adapt any trained machine learning model to fool Shapley value-based explanations. We prove that Shapley values cannot detect shuffling attacks. However, algorithms that estimate Shapley values, such as linear SHAP and SHAP, can detect these attacks with varying degrees of effectiveness. We demonstrate the efficacy of the attack strategies by comparing the performance of linear SHAP and SHAP using real-world datasets.

Read more

8/14/2024

Feature Inference Attack on Shapley Values
Total Score

0

Feature Inference Attack on Shapley Values

Xinjian Luo, Yangfan Jiang, Xiaokui Xiao

As a solution concept in cooperative game theory, Shapley value is highly recognized in model interpretability studies and widely adopted by the leading Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) providers, such as Google, Microsoft, and IBM. However, as the Shapley value-based model interpretability methods have been thoroughly studied, few researchers consider the privacy risks incurred by Shapley values, despite that interpretability and privacy are two foundations of machine learning (ML) models. In this paper, we investigate the privacy risks of Shapley value-based model interpretability methods using feature inference attacks: reconstructing the private model inputs based on their Shapley value explanations. Specifically, we present two adversaries. The first adversary can reconstruct the private inputs by training an attack model based on an auxiliary dataset and black-box access to the model interpretability services. The second adversary, even without any background knowledge, can successfully reconstruct most of the private features by exploiting the local linear correlations between the model inputs and outputs. We perform the proposed attacks on the leading MLaaS platforms, i.e., Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and IBM aix360. The experimental results demonstrate the vulnerability of the state-of-the-art Shapley value-based model interpretability methods used in the leading MLaaS platforms and highlight the significance and necessity of designing privacy-preserving model interpretability methods in future studies. To our best knowledge, this is also the first work that investigates the privacy risks of Shapley values.

Read more

7/17/2024