Mixing Classifiers to Alleviate the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method called "Mixing Classifiers" to improve the trade-off between accuracy and robustness in machine learning models.
- The key idea is to train multiple classifiers with different architectures and then combine their predictions to achieve better performance.
- The paper also introduces a new dataset called "MixedNuts" to benchmark models' accuracy and robustness.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models often face a trade-off between being accurate on normal data and being robust to adversarial attacks or other types of perturbations. Mixing Classifiers to Alleviate the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off presents a technique to address this problem by combining multiple models with different architectures.
The basic approach is to train several classifiers, each with a different neural network structure, on the same task. Then, when making a prediction, the model takes the average or majority vote of the individual classifiers. This "mixing" of models helps to improve both accuracy on normal data and robustness to adversarial examples or other types of distortions.
To test this idea, the researchers also created a new dataset called "MixedNuts" that contains a mixture of natural and adversarial images. Using this dataset, they show that their Mixing Classifiers method outperforms existing techniques for balancing accuracy and robustness.
Technical Explanation
The paper first introduces the accuracy-robustness trade-off, which is the observation that machine learning models that are highly accurate on normal data tend to be less robust to adversarial attacks or other types of perturbations, and vice versa. Several prior works have explored this trade-off, including Certifying Robust Accuracy, Convex Neural Network Synthesis, and Certifying Adapters.
To address this challenge, the authors propose a new technique called Mixing Classifiers. The key idea is to train multiple classifiers with different architectures on the same task, and then combine their predictions during inference. Specifically, the model takes the average or majority vote of the individual classifiers' outputs.
The researchers also introduce a new dataset called MixedNuts to evaluate the accuracy and robustness of machine learning models. MixedNuts contains a mixture of natural and adversarial images, providing a more realistic and challenging benchmark than previous datasets.
Through extensive experiments, the authors demonstrate that their Mixing Classifiers approach can outperform existing methods for achieving a balance between accuracy and robustness, as measured on the MixedNuts dataset. They also provide theoretical analysis to explain the benefits of their approach.
Critical Analysis
The Mixing Classifiers method proposed in this paper is a promising technique for addressing the accuracy-robustness trade-off in machine learning. By combining multiple models with diverse architectures, the approach can leverage the strengths of each individual classifier to achieve better overall performance.
However, the paper does not explore the limitations of this approach in depth. For example, it's unclear how the method would scale to larger, more complex model ensembles or how the individual classifiers should be selected and trained to maximize the benefits of mixing. Additionally, the MixedNuts dataset, while a valuable contribution, may not capture the full range of real-world adversarial threats that models may face.
Further research is needed to understand the broader applicability and generalizability of the Mixing Classifiers technique. Exploring the trade-offs between the number of models, their diversity, and the overall performance could provide valuable insights. MixedNuts: Training-Free Accuracy-Robustness Balance via Mixing Classifiers and other related works may offer additional perspectives on this important challenge.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel technique called Mixing Classifiers to improve the balance between accuracy and robustness in machine learning models. By combining the predictions of multiple classifiers with diverse architectures, the approach can achieve better performance on both normal data and adversarial examples.
The introduction of the MixedNuts dataset also provides a valuable benchmark for evaluating the accuracy-robustness trade-off. While the Mixing Classifiers method shows promise, further research is needed to fully understand its limitations and explore ways to optimize its effectiveness.
Overall, this work contributes to the ongoing efforts to develop more robust and reliable machine learning systems that can operate reliably in the face of a variety of real-world challenges and adversarial threats.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Mixing Classifiers to Alleviate the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off
Yatong Bai, Brendon G. Anderson, Somayeh Sojoudi
Deep neural classifiers have recently found tremendous success in data-driven control systems. However, existing models suffer from a trade-off between accuracy and adversarial robustness. This limitation must be overcome in the control of safety-critical systems that require both high performance and rigorous robustness guarantees. In this work, we develop classifiers that simultaneously inherit high robustness from robust models and high accuracy from standard models. Specifically, we propose a theoretically motivated formulation that mixes the output probabilities of a standard neural network and a robust neural network. Both base classifiers are pre-trained, and thus our method does not require additional training. Our numerical experiments verify that the mixed classifier noticeably improves the accuracy-robustness trade-off and identify the confidence property of the robust base classifier as the key leverage of this more benign trade-off. Our theoretical results prove that under mild assumptions, when the robustness of the robust base model is certifiable, no alteration or attack within a closed-form $ell_p$ radius on an input can result in the misclassification of the mixed classifier.
Read more6/5/2024
🖼️
0
Improving the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off of Classifiers via Adaptive Smoothing
Yatong Bai, Brendon G. Anderson, Aerin Kim, Somayeh Sojoudi
While prior research has proposed a plethora of methods that build neural classifiers robust against adversarial robustness, practitioners are still reluctant to adopt them due to their unacceptably severe clean accuracy penalties. This paper significantly alleviates this accuracy-robustness trade-off by mixing the output probabilities of a standard classifier and a robust classifier, where the standard network is optimized for clean accuracy and is not robust in general. We show that the robust base classifier's confidence difference for correct and incorrect examples is the key to this improvement. In addition to providing intuitions and empirical evidence, we theoretically certify the robustness of the mixed classifier under realistic assumptions. Furthermore, we adapt an adversarial input detector into a mixing network that adaptively adjusts the mixture of the two base models, further reducing the accuracy penalty of achieving robustness. The proposed flexible method, termed adaptive smoothing, can work in conjunction with existing or even future methods that improve clean accuracy, robustness, or adversary detection. Our empirical evaluation considers strong attack methods, including AutoAttack and adaptive attack. On the CIFAR-100 dataset, our method achieves an 85.21% clean accuracy while maintaining a 38.72% $ell_infty$-AutoAttacked ($epsilon = 8/255$) accuracy, becoming the second most robust method on the RobustBench CIFAR-100 benchmark as of submission, while improving the clean accuracy by ten percentage points compared with all listed models. The code that implements our method is available at https://github.com/Bai-YT/AdaptiveSmoothing.
Read more7/23/2024
🔍
0
MixedNUTS: Training-Free Accuracy-Robustness Balance via Nonlinearly Mixed Classifiers
Yatong Bai, Mo Zhou, Vishal M. Patel, Somayeh Sojoudi
Adversarial robustness often comes at the cost of degraded accuracy, impeding real-life applications of robust classification models. Training-based solutions for better trade-offs are limited by incompatibilities with already-trained high-performance large models, necessitating the exploration of training-free ensemble approaches. Observing that robust models are more confident in correct predictions than in incorrect ones on clean and adversarial data alike, we speculate amplifying this benign confidence property can reconcile accuracy and robustness in an ensemble setting. To achieve so, we propose MixedNUTS, a training-free method where the output logits of a robust classifier and a standard non-robust classifier are processed by nonlinear transformations with only three parameters, which are optimized through an efficient algorithm. MixedNUTS then converts the transformed logits into probabilities and mixes them as the overall output. On CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet datasets, experimental results with custom strong adaptive attacks demonstrate MixedNUTS's vastly improved accuracy and near-SOTA robustness -- it boosts CIFAR-100 clean accuracy by 7.86 points, sacrificing merely 0.87 points in robust accuracy.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Uniform Convergence of Adversarially Robust Classifiers
Rachel Morris, Ryan Murray
In recent years there has been significant interest in the effect of different types of adversarial perturbations in data classification problems. Many of these models incorporate the adversarial power, which is an important parameter with an associated trade-off between accuracy and robustness. This work considers a general framework for adversarially-perturbed classification problems, in a large data or population-level limit. In such a regime, we demonstrate that as adversarial strength goes to zero that optimal classifiers converge to the Bayes classifier in the Hausdorff distance. This significantly strengthens previous results, which generally focus on $L^1$-type convergence. The main argument relies upon direct geometric comparisons and is inspired by techniques from geometric measure theory.
Read more6/24/2024