Modes of Analyzing Disinformation Narratives With AI/ML/Text Mining to Assist in Mitigating the Weaponization of Social Media
2405.15987
0
0
Abstract
This paper highlights the developing need for quantitative modes for capturing and monitoring malicious communication in social media. There has been a deliberate weaponization of messaging through the use of social networks including by politically oriented entities both state sponsored and privately run. The article identifies a use of AI/ML characterization of generalized mal-info, a broad term which includes deliberate malicious narratives similar with hate speech, which adversely impact society. A key point of the discussion is that this mal-info will dramatically increase in volume, and it will become essential for sharable quantifying tools to provide support for human expert intervention. Despite attempts to introduce moderation on major platforms like Facebook and X/Twitter, there are now established alternative social networks that offer completely unmoderated spaces. The paper presents an introduction to these platforms and the initial results of a qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of characteristic mal-info posts. The authors perform a rudimentary text mining function for a preliminary characterization in order to evaluate the modes for better-automated monitoring. The action examines several inflammatory terms using text analysis and, importantly, discusses the use of generative algorithms by one political agent in particular, providing some examples of the potential risks to society. This latter is of grave concern, and monitoring tools must be established. This paper presents a preliminary step to selecting relevant sources and to setting a foundation for characterizing the mal-info, which must be monitored. The AI/ML methods provide a means for semi-quantitative signature capture. The impending use of mal-GenAI is presented.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Explores the use of AI/ML/text mining techniques to analyze disinformation narratives and mitigate the weaponization of social media
- Focuses on the emergence of fringe social networks that enable the spread of misinformation
- Proposes various methods for detecting, classifying, and countering disinformation campaigns
Plain English Explanation
This research paper examines how advanced technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and text mining can be leveraged to better understand and address the proliferation of disinformation on social media platforms.
The researchers highlight the rise of "fringe" social networks - online communities that often promote alternative or conspiratorial narratives outside the mainstream. These networks can serve as breeding grounds for the spread of false information, which can then be amplified and weaponized to sway public opinion and undermine trust in institutions.
The paper outlines several techniques that could be used to combat this threat, including classifying human-generated vs. AI-generated election claims, detecting LLM-powered misinformation, and humanizing machine-generated content to evade AI detection. By better understanding the tactics used to spread disinformation, the researchers aim to empower platforms, policymakers, and the public to more effectively mitigate the weaponization of social media.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores several strategies for analyzing and responding to disinformation narratives using advanced AI/ML/text mining techniques. One key focus is on the emergence of "fringe" social networks that serve as hubs for the spread of alternative, conspiratorial, and often false information.
The researchers propose a framework for leveraging large language models to power agent-based simulations that can model the dynamics of disinformation campaigns. This could provide insights into how narratives evolve and spread across these fringe networks.
Additionally, the paper discusses methods for classifying human-generated vs. AI-generated election claims, which could help platforms and fact-checkers identify and address machine-generated disinformation. The researchers also explore techniques for detecting LLM-powered misinformation and humanizing machine-generated content to evade AI text detection.
Critical Analysis
While the proposed approaches offer promising avenues for mitigating disinformation, the researchers acknowledge several caveats and areas for further research. For example, the efficacy of these techniques may depend on the specific social network and the nature of the disinformation narratives being targeted.
Additionally, there are concerns about the potential for these technologies to be misused or to have unintended consequences. Generative AI models, while powerful, could also be leveraged to create more sophisticated and convincing forms of disinformation. Careful consideration must be given to the ethical implications and potential misuse of these tools.
Further research is needed to understand the long-term impacts of these interventions on the information ecosystem, as well as the evolving strategies used by bad actors to circumvent detection and mitigation efforts.
Conclusion
This research paper highlights the critical need to leverage advanced technologies like AI, ML, and text mining to better understand and combat the spread of disinformation on social media. By focusing on the dynamics of fringe social networks and exploring a range of detection and mitigation strategies, the researchers aim to empower platforms, policymakers, and the public to more effectively address the weaponization of social media.
However, the researchers also acknowledge the complexities and potential risks associated with these approaches, underscoring the importance of ongoing research, multistakeholder collaboration, and a nuanced, ethical approach to addressing this pressing challenge.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large-Language-Model-Powered Agent-Based Framework for Misinformation and Disinformation Research: Opportunities and Open Challenges
Javier Pastor-Galindo, Pantaleone Nespoli, Jos'e A. Ruip'erez-Valiente
0
0
This article presents the affordances that Generative Artificial Intelligence can have in misinformation and disinformation contexts, major threats to our digitalized society. We present a research framework to generate customized agent-based social networks for disinformation simulations that would enable understanding and evaluating the phenomena whilst discussing open challenges.
4/30/2024
🔍
Classifying Human-Generated and AI-Generated Election Claims in Social Media
Alphaeus Dmonte, Marcos Zampieri, Kevin Lybarger, Massimiliano Albanese, Genya Coulter
0
0
Politics is one of the most prevalent topics discussed on social media platforms, particularly during major election cycles, where users engage in conversations about candidates and electoral processes. Malicious actors may use this opportunity to disseminate misinformation to undermine trust in the electoral process. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) exacerbates this issue by enabling malicious actors to generate misinformation at an unprecedented scale. Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content is often indistinguishable from authentic user content, raising concerns about the integrity of information on social networks. In this paper, we present a novel taxonomy for characterizing election-related claims. This taxonomy provides an instrument for analyzing election-related claims, with granular categories related to jurisdiction, equipment, processes, and the nature of claims. We introduce ElectAI, a novel benchmark dataset that consists of 9,900 tweets, each labeled as human- or AI-generated. For AI-generated tweets, the specific LLM variant that produced them is specified. We annotated a subset of 1,550 tweets using the proposed taxonomy to capture the characteristics of election-related claims. We explored the capabilities of LLMs in extracting the taxonomy attributes and trained various machine learning models using ElectAI to distinguish between human- and AI-generated posts and identify the specific LLM variant.
4/29/2024
Charting the Landscape of Nefarious Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Online Election Interference
Emilio Ferrara
0
0
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) pose significant risks, particularly in the realm of online election interference. This paper explores the nefarious applications of GenAI, highlighting their potential to disrupt democratic processes through deepfakes, botnets, targeted misinformation campaigns, and synthetic identities.
6/5/2024
Generative AI Misuse: A Taxonomy of Tactics and Insights from Real-World Data
Nahema Marchal, Rachel Xu, Rasmi Elasmar, Iason Gabriel, Beth Goldberg, William Isaac
0
0
Generative, multimodal artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers transformative potential across industries, but its misuse poses significant risks. Prior research has shed light on the potential of advanced AI systems to be exploited for malicious purposes. However, we still lack a concrete understanding of how GenAI models are specifically exploited or abused in practice, including the tactics employed to inflict harm. In this paper, we present a taxonomy of GenAI misuse tactics, informed by existing academic literature and a qualitative analysis of approximately 200 observed incidents of misuse reported between January 2023 and March 2024. Through this analysis, we illuminate key and novel patterns in misuse during this time period, including potential motivations, strategies, and how attackers leverage and abuse system capabilities across modalities (e.g. image, text, audio, video) in the wild.
6/24/2024