Multi-Modal and Multi-Agent Systems Meet Rationality: A Survey
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the intersection between multi-modal and multi-agent systems and the concept of rationality.
- It explores how these fields can be combined to create more advanced and effective artificial intelligence systems.
- The paper delves into the various definitions and interpretations of rationality, and how they can be applied in the context of multi-modal and multi-agent systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the relationship between multi-modal and multi-agent systems, which involve multiple types of data (e.g., text, images, audio) and multiple intelligent agents interacting with each other, and the concept of rationality. Rationality is the idea that an intelligent agent should make decisions that are logical and maximize the achievement of its goals.
The researchers explore how these two areas can be combined to create more sophisticated AI systems that can process diverse information, reason about it, and make rational decisions. They discuss the different ways rationality can be defined and applied in the context of multi-modal and multi-agent systems, such as link to "Mixture Rationale for Multi-Modal Reasoning", link to "Simulating Economic Impact of Rationality Through Reinforcement Learning", and link to "Tailoring Self-Rationalizers for Multi-Reward Distillation".
By understanding how rationality can be applied in these complex systems, the researchers aim to develop more effective and reliable AI agents that can make informed decisions based on diverse information sources and interactions with other agents, as seen in link to "MMCTAgent: Multi-Modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework" and link to "Confidence Calibration and Rationalization of LLMs via Multi-Agent".
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining the key concepts of multi-modal and multi-agent systems, and the various interpretations of rationality that can be applied in these contexts. It then explores how these different notions of rationality can be incorporated into the design and training of AI agents that operate in complex, multi-modal and multi-agent environments.
The researchers review a range of existing approaches and case studies, such as link to "Mixture Rationale for Multi-Modal Reasoning", which demonstrates how a mixture of rationalization mechanisms can be used to enhance multi-modal reasoning, and link to "Simulating Economic Impact of Rationality Through Reinforcement Learning", which explores the use of reinforcement learning to model the economic impact of rationality in multi-agent systems.
The paper also discusses more advanced techniques, such as link to "Tailoring Self-Rationalizers for Multi-Reward Distillation", which investigates the use of multi-reward distillation to create self-rationalizing agents, and link to "MMCTAgent: Multi-Modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework" and link to "Confidence Calibration and Rationalization of LLMs via Multi-Agent", which present frameworks for incorporating critical thinking and confidence calibration into multi-modal and multi-agent systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched survey of the intersection between multi-modal and multi-agent systems and the concept of rationality. However, it does acknowledge some of the limitations and challenges in this area, such as the difficulty of defining and measuring rationality in complex, dynamic environments, and the potential for biases and inconsistencies to arise in the decision-making processes of multi-agent systems.
Additionally, the paper suggests that further research is needed to better understand the interplay between different types of rationality (e.g., individual, collective, or societal) and how they can be balanced and optimized within multi-modal and multi-agent systems. There may also be concerns about the ethical implications of deploying such systems, particularly in high-stakes domains, which the paper does not fully address.
Overall, the paper provides a valuable contribution to the field by synthesizing a diverse range of research and highlighting the importance of continued exploration in this rapidly evolving area of AI and autonomous systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the intersection between multi-modal and multi-agent systems and the concept of rationality. It explores how these fields can be combined to create more advanced and effective AI systems that can process diverse information, reason about it, and make rational decisions.
The researchers examine various interpretations of rationality and how they can be applied in the context of multi-modal and multi-agent systems, drawing on a range of existing approaches and case studies. The paper also highlights the challenges and limitations in this area, as well as the need for further research to better understand the interplay between different types of rationality and their implications for the design and deployment of such systems.
Overall, this survey provides a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working at the intersection of multi-modal and multi-agent systems and the concept of rationality, and it sets the stage for continued advancements in this rapidly evolving field of AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Multi-Modal and Multi-Agent Systems Meet Rationality: A Survey
Bowen Jiang, Yangxinyu Xie, Xiaomeng Wang, Weijie J. Su, Camillo J. Taylor, Tanwi Mallick
Rationality is the quality of being guided by reason, characterized by logical thinking and decision-making that align with evidence and logical rules. This quality is essential for effective problem-solving, as it ensures that solutions are well-founded and systematically derived. Despite the advancements of large language models (LLMs) in generating human-like text with remarkable accuracy, they present biases inherited from the training data, inconsistency across different contexts, and difficulty understanding complex scenarios involving multiple layers of context. Therefore, recent research attempts to leverage the strength of multiple agents working collaboratively with various types of data and tools for enhanced consistency and reliability. To that end, this paper aims to understand whether multi-modal and multi-agent systems are advancing toward rationality by surveying the state-of-the-art works, identifying advancements over single-agent and single-modal systems in terms of rationality, and discussing open problems and future directions. We maintain an open repository at https://github.com/bowen-upenn/MMMA_Rationality.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Mixture of Rationale: Multi-Modal Reasoning Mixture for Visual Question Answering
Tao Li, Linjun Shou, Xuejun Liu
Zero-shot visual question answering (VQA) is a challenging task that requires reasoning across modalities. While some existing methods rely on a single rationale within the Chain of Thoughts (CoT) framework, they may fall short of capturing the complexity of the VQA problem. On the other hand, some other methods that use multiple rationales may still suffer from low diversity, poor modality alignment, and inefficient retrieval and fusion. In response to these challenges, we propose emph{Mixture of Rationales (MoR)}, a novel multi-modal reasoning method that mixes multiple rationales for VQA. MoR uses a single frozen Vision-and-Language Pre-trained Models (VLPM) model to {dynamically generate, retrieve and fuse multi-modal thoughts}. We evaluate MoR on two challenging VQA datasets, i.e. NLVR2 and OKVQA, with two representative backbones OFA and VL-T5. MoR achieves a 12.43% accuracy improvement on NLVR2, and a 2.45% accuracy improvement on OKVQA-S( the science and technology category of OKVQA).
Read more6/4/2024
0
Simulating the economic impact of rationality through reinforcement learning and agent-based modelling
Simone Brusatin, Tommaso Padoan, Andrea Coletta, Domenico Delli Gatti, Aldo Glielmo
Agent-based models (ABMs) are simulation models used in economics to overcome some of the limitations of traditional frameworks based on general equilibrium assumptions. However, agents within an ABM follow predetermined, not fully rational, behavioural rules which can be cumbersome to design and difficult to justify. Here we leverage multi-agent reinforcement learning (RL) to expand the capabilities of ABMs with the introduction of fully rational agents that learn their policy by interacting with the environment and maximising a reward function. Specifically, we propose a 'Rational macro ABM' (R-MABM) framework by extending a paradigmatic macro ABM from the economic literature. We show that gradually substituting ABM firms in the model with RL agents, trained to maximise profits, allows for a thorough study of the impact of rationality on the economy. We find that RL agents spontaneously learn three distinct strategies for maximising profits, with the optimal strategy depending on the level of market competition and rationality. We also find that RL agents with independent policies, and without the ability to communicate with each other, spontaneously learn to segregate into different strategic groups, thus increasing market power and overall profits. Finally, we find that a higher degree of rationality in the economy always improves the macroeconomic environment as measured by total output, depending on the specific rational policy, this can come at the cost of higher instability. Our R-MABM framework is general, it allows for stable multi-agent learning, and represents a principled and robust direction to extend existing economic simulators.
Read more5/6/2024
🏋️
0
Tailoring Self-Rationalizers with Multi-Reward Distillation
Sahana Ramnath, Brihi Joshi, Skyler Hallinan, Ximing Lu, Liunian Harold Li, Aaron Chan, Jack Hessel, Yejin Choi, Xiang Ren
Large language models (LMs) are capable of generating free-text rationales to aid question answering. However, prior work 1) suggests that useful self-rationalization is emergent only at significant scales (e.g., 175B parameter GPT-3); and 2) focuses largely on downstream performance, ignoring the semantics of the rationales themselves, e.g., are they faithful, true, and helpful for humans? In this work, we enable small-scale LMs (approx. 200x smaller than GPT-3) to generate rationales that not only improve downstream task performance, but are also more plausible, consistent, and diverse, assessed both by automatic and human evaluation. Our method, MaRio (Multi-rewArd RatIOnalization), is a multi-reward conditioned self-rationalization algorithm that optimizes multiple distinct properties like plausibility, diversity and consistency. Results on five difficult question-answering datasets StrategyQA, QuaRel, OpenBookQA, NumerSense and QASC show that not only does MaRio improve task accuracy, but it also improves the self-rationalization quality of small LMs across the aforementioned axes better than a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) baseline. Extensive human evaluations confirm that MaRio rationales are preferred vs. SFT rationales, as well as qualitative improvements in plausibility and consistency.
Read more5/24/2024